The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy

In many places, the electricity sector is transitioning towards greater share of renewable energy technologies. In the initial phase of the transition, a primary concern for research and policy was to establish renewables as technically and economically viable options. Today, the situation is different: renewables are diffusing rapidly in many electricity grids, thereby generating major changes for existing technologies, organizations and infrastructures. In this new phase of the energy transition, we do not just witness an acceleration of earlier transition dynamics, but also qualitatively new phenomena. These include a complex interaction of multiple technologies, the decline of established business models and technologies, intensified economic and political struggles of key actors such as utility companies and industry associations, and major challenges for the overall functioning and performance of the electricity sector (for example, when integrating renewables). Drawing on a transition studies perspective, this paper compares the two phases and discusses implications for research and policymaking.The energy transition has been alternatively characterized as a gradual transformation, a technological disruption or a systemic change. This Perspective argues that the transition is entering a new phase where it has unique characteristics, and research and policy can no longer treat it as a gradual transformation or mere disruption.

[1]  F. Geels,et al.  Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997) , 2012 .

[2]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions , 2016 .

[3]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Pluralising progress: From integrative transitions to transformative diversity , 2011 .

[4]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[5]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and economics of constructing, contesting and restricting socio-political space for renewables - the German Renewable Energy Act , 2016 .

[6]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[7]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  The sectoral configuration of technological innovation systems: Patterns of knowledge development and diffusion in the lithium-ion battery technology in Japan , 2017 .

[8]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Framing the sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada , 2016 .

[9]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[10]  Gregor Kungl,et al.  Stewards or sticklers for change? Incumbent energy providers and the politics of the German energy transition , 2015 .

[11]  Sjoerd Bakker,et al.  Competing expectations: the case of hydrogen storage technologies , 2010, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[12]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics , 2015 .

[13]  Rpjm Rob Raven,et al.  Niche accumulation and hybridisation strategies in transition processes towards a sustainable energy system: An assessment of differences and pitfalls , 2007 .

[14]  D. Hess.  Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective , 2014 .

[15]  K. Ingold,et al.  Socio-Technical Transitions and Policy Change - Advocacy Coalitions in Swiss Energy Policy , 2016 .

[16]  Juha-Antti Lamberg,et al.  Thinking about industry decline: A qualitative meta-analysis and future research directions , 2018 .

[17]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization , 2017, Science.

[18]  Benjamin Sovacool.  How Long Will It Take? Conceptualizing the Temporal Dynamics of Energy Transitions , 2016 .

[19]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Creative Destruction or Mere Niche Creation? Innovation Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions , 2015 .

[20]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden , 2011 .

[21]  M. Milligan,et al.  Integrating Variable Renewable Energy: Challenges and Solutions , 2013 .

[22]  D. Rosenbloom,et al.  Pathways: An emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transitions , 2017 .

[23]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won't work) , 2010 .

[24]  Lee-Ann Sutherland,et al.  Conceptualising multi-regime interactions: The role of the agriculture sector in renewable energy transitions , 2015 .

[25]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building , 2012 .

[26]  Marc Dijk,et al.  Will the momentum of the electric car last? Testing an hypothesis on disruptive innovation , 2016 .

[27]  V. Hoffmann,et al.  Analysis of complementarities: Framework and examples from the energy transition , 2016 .

[28]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[29]  F. Kern,et al.  Analysing Energy Transitions: Combining Insights from Transition Studies and International Political Economy , 2016 .

[30]  B. Truffer,et al.  Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts , 2017 .

[31]  F. Geels,et al.  The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014) , 2016 .

[32]  A. Stirling.  Transforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices , 2014 .

[33]  J. Bergh,et al.  Policies to enhance economic feasibility of a sustainable energy transition , 2013 .

[34]  Till Stenzel,et al.  Regulating technological change—The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets , 2008 .

[35]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[36]  J. Voss,et al.  Reflexive governance for sustainable development , 2006 .

[37]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[38]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales , 2012 .

[39]  C. Mitchell.  Momentum is increasing towards a flexible electricity system based on renewables , 2016, Nature Energy.

[40]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[41]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis , 2016 .

[42]  Sabine Erlinghagen,et al.  Smart grids and the transformation of the electricity sector: ICT firms as potential catalysts for sectoral change , 2012 .