The immune system: a weapon of mass destruction invented by evolution to even the odds during the war of the DNAs

Summary: Living systems operate under interactive selective pressures. Populations have the ability to anticipate the future by generating a repertoire of elements that cope with new selective pressures. If the repertoire of such elements were transcendental, natural selection could not operate because any one of them would be too rare. This is the problem that vertebrates faced in order to deal with a vast number of pathogens. The solution was to invent an immune system that underwent somatic evolution. This required a random repertoire that was generated somatically and divided the antigenic universe into combinatorials of determinants. As a result, it became virtually impossible for pathogens to escape recognition but the functioning of such a repertoire required two new regulatory mechanisms: 1) a somatic discriminator between Not‐To‐Be‐Ridded (‘Self’) and To‐Be‐Ridded (‘Non‐self’) antigens, and 2) a way to optimize the magnitude and choice of the class of the effector response. The principles governing this dual regulation are analyzed in the light of natural selection.

[1]  C. Janeway,et al.  Progress in immunology. Syndromes of diminished resistance to infection. , 1968, The Journal of pediatrics.

[2]  M. Cohn A new concept of immune specificity emerges from a consideration of the self-nonself discrimination. , 1997, Cellular immunology.

[3]  M. Cohn Some Thoughts on the Response to Antigens that are Effector T‐Helper Independent (‘Thymus Independence’) , 1997, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[4]  M Cohn,et al.  To be or Not to be Ridded? – That is the Question Addressed by the Associative Antigen Recognition Model *† , 2002, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[5]  R. Langman The self-nonself discrimination is not regulated by suppression. , 1987, Cellular immunology.

[6]  Sigrid S. Glenn,et al.  At last: Serious consideration , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  M Cohn,et al.  Self-nonself discrimination revisited. Introduction. , 2000, Seminars in immunology.

[8]  M. Cohn Conversations with Niels Kaj Jerne on immune regulation: associative versus network recognition. , 1981, Cellular immunology.

[9]  M. Cohn The T-cell receptor mediating restrictive recognition of antigen , 1983, Cell.

[10]  M. Cohn,et al.  The Protection: The Unit of Humoral Immunity Selected by Evolution , 1990, Immunological reviews.

[11]  T. Matsunaga,et al.  In Search of the Origin of the Thymus: the Thymus and GALT May Be Evolutionarily Related* , 2001, Scandinavian journal of immunology.

[12]  M. Cohn,et al.  The E-T (elephant-tadpole) paradox necessitates the concept of a unit of B-cell function: the protection. , 1987, Molecular immunology.

[13]  M. Cohn The self/nonself discrimination: reconstructing a cabbage from sauerkraut. , 1992, Research in immunology.

[14]  D. Hull,et al.  A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  The specificity of immunological reactions. , 2000, Molecular immunology.

[16]  Langman,et al.  The Standard Model of T‐Cell Receptor Function: A Critical Reassessment , 1999, Scandinavian journal of immunology.