Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Sizes of High School Learners

The realization that there is a mismatch between the vocabulary level presented in the Korean National Curriculum, and the required vocabulary size for EFL (English as a Foreign Language) high school learners to take the high-stakes Korean College Scholastic Ability Test stimulated the researchers of the present study to administer an assessment of Korean high school learners’ vocabulary sizes. Measurement of vocabulary knowledge was conducted with the adaptation of Nation’s bilingual vocabulary size test, receptive and productive, by improving construct validity of the items. Learners were tested for the 1st ~ 10th 1,000 word bands to ascertain learners’ vocabulary size at each level. The assessment of vocabulary size demonstrated receptive vocabulary knowledge to be as large as 6,000 words. However, unforeseen rises in the EFL learners’ vocabulary sizes at some word bands were observed, which seem to have emerged from the educational milieu and the predominant focus on receptive lexical knowledge and the testing of them. Suggestions are proposed for the revision of word list of the National Curriculum, which would become the blueprint for controlling vocabulary level in the development of national textbooks of English.

[1]  S. Webb RECEPTIVE AND PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY SIZES OF L2 LEARNERS , 2008, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[2]  Yuah Vicky Chon,et al.  A Corpus-based Analysis of Curriculum-based Elementary and Secondary English Textbooks , 2011 .

[3]  Svenja Adolphs,et al.  Lexical Coverage of Spoken Discourse , 2003 .

[4]  Ari Nurweni,et al.  THE ENGLISH VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE OF INDONESIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS , 1999 .

[5]  P. Nation,et al.  Graded Readers and Vocabulary , 2020 .

[6]  May Fan,et al.  How Big Is the Gap and How To Narrow It? an Investigation Into the Active and Passive Vocabulary Knowledge of L2 Learners , 2000 .

[7]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test , 2001 .

[8]  Batia Laufer,et al.  The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language : Same or different ? , 1998 .

[9]  M. Swain,et al.  Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning , 1995, Applied Linguistics.

[10]  R. Ellis Designing a Task-Based Syllabus , 2003 .

[11]  B. Laufer How Much Lexis is Necessary for Reading Comprehension , 1992 .

[12]  Ingo Plag,et al.  Words in the mind , 2012 .

[13]  I. S. P. Nation,et al.  Learning Vocabulary in Another Language: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[14]  Y. V. Chon,et al.  The Electronic Dictionary for Writing: A Solution or a Problem? , 2009 .

[15]  Batia Laufer,et al.  The Relationship Between Passive and Active Vocabularies: Effects of LanguageLearning Context , 1998 .

[16]  R. J. Hill Active and Passive Vocabulary , 1971 .

[17]  N. Schmitt Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning , 2008 .

[18]  P. Nation,et al.  What vocabulary size is needed toread unsimplified texts for pleasure? , 2020 .

[19]  J. Crow Receptive Vocabulary Acquisition for Reading Comprehension. , 1986 .

[20]  Dongkwang Shin The High Frequency Collocations of Spoken and Written English , 2007 .

[21]  P. Nation,et al.  A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability , 1999 .

[22]  R. Goulden,et al.  How large can a receptive vocabulary be? , 1990 .

[23]  Rob Waring,et al.  A Comparison of the Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Sizes of Some Second Language Learners , 1997 .

[24]  M. Keshavarz,et al.  Collocational competence and cloze test performance: a study of Iranian EFL learners , 2007 .

[25]  M. Wesche,et al.  Assessing Second Language Vocabulary Knowledge: Depth Versus Breadth. , 1996 .

[26]  Paul Nation,et al.  Teaching and learning vocabulary , 1994 .

[27]  Henri Béjoint,et al.  Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics , 1992 .

[28]  I. Nation How Large a Vocabulary Is Needed for Reading and Listening? , 2006 .