The emergence of the unmarked: A new perspective on the language‐specific function of Broca's area

A number of neuroimaging studies have implicated an involvement of Broca's area, particularly of the pars opercularis of the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), in the processing of complex (permuted) sentences. However, functional interpretations of this region's role range from very general (e.g., in terms of working memory) to highly specific (e.g., as supporting particular types of syntactic operations). A dissociation of these competing accounts is often impossible because in most cases, the language internal complexity of permuted sentence structures is accompanied invariably by increasing costs of a more general cognitive nature (e.g., working memory, task difficulty, and acceptability). We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore the precise nature of the pars opercularis activation in the processing of permuted sentences by examining the permutation of pronouns in German. Although clearly involving a permutation operation, sentences with an initial object pronoun behave like simple, subject‐initial sentences (e.g., in terms of acceptability) because of a rule stating that pronouns should generally precede non‐pronominal arguments. The results of the experiment show that in contrast to non‐pronominal permutations, sentences with a permuted pronoun do not engender enhanced pars opercularis activation. Our findings therefore speak against both language‐related working memory and transformation‐based accounts of this region's role in sentence comprehension. Rather, we argue that the pars opercularis of the left IFG supports the language‐specific linearization of hierarchical linguistic dependencies. Hum Brain Mapp, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  A. Friederici Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  T. Hendler,et al.  The Neural Reality of Syntactic Transformations , 2003, Psychological science.

[3]  David M. Perlmutter Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .

[4]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Predicting Perceptual Events Activates Corresponding Motor Schemes in Lateral Premotor Cortex: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Jürgen Lenerz,et al.  Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen , 1977 .

[7]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Why am I unsure? Internal and external attributions of uncertainty dissociated by fMRI , 2004, NeuroImage.

[8]  G. Kempen,et al.  A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: Animacy affects linearization independently of grammatical function assignment , 2003 .

[9]  Anna Siewierska,et al.  Word order rules , 1988 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[11]  Johannes Engelkamp,et al.  Wortstellung im deutschen Mittelfeld , 1996 .

[12]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Parsing of Sentences in a Language with Varying Word Order: Word-by-Word Variations of Processing Demands Are Revealed by Event-Related Brain Potentials ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1998 .

[13]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  Cause and the structure of verbs , 1997 .

[14]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Common and Distinct Neural Substrates for Pragmatic, Semantic, and Syntactic Processing of Spoken Sentences: An fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  T. Braver,et al.  The Role of Frontopolar Cortex in Subgoal Processing during Working Memory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[16]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Bach Speaks: A Cortical “Language-Network” Serves the Processing of Music , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[18]  E Zarahn,et al.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. II. Spatially smoothed data collected under null-hypothesis and experimental conditions. , 1997, NeuroImage.

[19]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[20]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The Cortical Motor System , 2001, Neuron.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[22]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[23]  Y. Grodzinsky The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of Language , 1940 .

[25]  D G Norris,et al.  Reduced power multislice MDEFT imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  E. Kaan,et al.  The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Ursula Hoberg Die Wortstellung in der geschriebenen deutschen Gegenwartssprache , 1981 .

[29]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[31]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  Brian D. Joseph,et al.  Studies in relational grammar , 1984 .

[33]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .

[34]  F. Rösler,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by the Comprehension of Normal and Pseudo-word Sentences of Different Processing Demands: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[35]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Word order effects in German sentences and German pseudo-word sentences , 2000 .

[36]  Karin Harbusch,et al.  How flexible is constituent order in the midfield of German subordinate clauses?: A corpus study revealing unexpected rigidity , 2004 .

[37]  Angelika Wöllstein-Leisten Deutsche Satzstruktur : Grundlagen der syntaktischen Analyse , 1997 .

[38]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[39]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Imaging at high magnetic fields: initial experiences at 4 T. , 1993, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[40]  J. Lenerz Zu Syntax und Semantik deutscher Personalpronomina , 1993 .

[41]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments , 2004, NeuroImage.

[42]  Mark Baltin,et al.  A-bar syntax : a study in movement types , 1995 .

[43]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[44]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[45]  S. Pinker,et al.  The faculty of language: what's special about it? , 2005, Cognition.

[46]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. I. Spatially unsmoothed data collected under null-hypothesis conditions. , 1997, NeuroImage.

[47]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[48]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Grammar overrides frequency: evidence from the online processing of flexible word order , 2002, Cognition.

[49]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[50]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The neurophysiological basis of word order variations in German , 2003, Brain and Language.

[51]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Empirical Analyses of BOLD fMRI Statistics , 1997, NeuroImage.

[52]  Volkmar Glauche,et al.  The human action recognition system and its relationship to Broca’s area: an fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[53]  G. Waters,et al.  Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[54]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs , 2001, NeuroImage.

[55]  Ralph-Axel Müller,et al.  Linguistic theory and neuroimaging evidence: an fMRI study of Broca’s area in lexical semantics , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Hubert Haider,et al.  Scrambling: Nontriggered Chain Formation in OV Languages , 2003, Journal of Germanic Linguistics.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[58]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neuroanatomical basis for first- and second-order representations of bodily states , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[59]  G Lohmann,et al.  LIPSIA--a new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[60]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Distinct neural correlates of legal and illegal word-order variations in German: How can fMRI inform cognitive models of sentence processing? , 2004 .

[61]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  A Blueprint for Target Motion: fMRI Reveals Perceived Sequential Complexity to Modulate Premotor Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[62]  R. Jackendoff Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[63]  A. Craig How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[64]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  G. Müller Optimality, markedness, and word order in German , 1999 .

[66]  A M Dale,et al.  Randomized event‐related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI , 1998, Neuroreport.

[67]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  Prefrontal, Parietal, and Temporal Cortex Networks Underlie Decision-Making in the Presence of Uncertainty , 2001, NeuroImage.

[68]  B. McElree,et al.  Multi-dimensional contributions to garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking , 2004 .

[69]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Generalisability, Random Effects & Population Inference , 1998, NeuroImage.

[70]  Markus Bader,et al.  Subject-Object Ambiguities in German Embedded Clauses: An Across-the-Board Comparison , 1999 .