Evidence-based priority-setting: what do the decision-makers think?

Objectives: Resource scarcity dictates the need for health organisations to set priorities. Although such activity should be based, at least in part, on evidence, there are limited examples in the literature of decision-makers reflecting on their use of evidence in priority-setting. Methods: A participatory action-research project was conducted in a single health authority in Alberta. It included in-depth interviews and focus groups with senior decision-makers both before and after development and implementation of a macro-level priority-setting framework (programme budgeting and marginal analysis, PBMA). Data were thematically coded and information on the use of evidence in priority-setting is reported. Results: Barriers to the use of evidence in priority-setting identified by decision-makers included crisis-orientated management, time constraints and a lack of skills. Decision-makers suggested using a mix of 'soft' and 'hard' forms of evidence in priority-setting. Following PBMA implementation, decision-makers wanted better information on capacity to benefit, but preferred to do this pragmatically from multiple sources of information rather than using a single metric. Conclusion: In examining the perspectives of decision-makers in using evidence to support priority-setting, valuable information was derived which should provide insight for such processes in other jurisdictions. The main finding of a desire for pragmatic assessment of benefit is informative for those involved in both decision-making and research.

[1]  Craig Mitton,et al.  Priority setting in health authorities: a novel approach to a historical activity. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[2]  A. Brennan,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of a technology appraisal process in England: the South and West Development and Evaluation Committee. , 2003, Journal of health services research & policy.

[3]  S. Birch Making the problem fit the solution: evidence-based decision-making and "Dolly" economics , 2002 .

[4]  C. Mitton,et al.  Twenty-five years of programme budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974-1999 , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[5]  K Walshe,et al.  Evidence-based management: from theory to practice in health care. , 2001, The Milbank quarterly.

[6]  R. Chesson,et al.  Health care management: models for evidence-based practice. , 2001, Journal of management in medicine.

[7]  A. Coulter,et al.  Explicit and implicit rationing: taking responsibility and avoiding blame for health care choices , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[8]  W. Wake-Dyster,et al.  Evidence-based priority setting. , 2001, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[9]  J. Graf von der Schulenburg,et al.  The influence of economic evaluation studies on decision making. A European survey. The EUROMET group. , 2000, Health policy.

[10]  R. Rosen Applying Research to Health Care Policy and Practice: Medical and Managerial Views on Effectiveness and the Role of Research , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[11]  Louise Fitzgerald,et al.  Getting Evidence into Clinical Practice: An Organisational Behaviour Perspective , 2000, Journal of health services research & policy.

[12]  A. Retsas,et al.  Barriers to using research evidence in nursing practice. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[13]  S. Prevost,et al.  Overcoming barriers to research-based practice. , 1999, Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses.

[14]  K. Gerrish,et al.  Evidence-based care: can we overcome the barriers? , 1998, British journal of nursing.

[15]  I. Papadopoulos,et al.  Barriers to evidence-based practice. , 1998, Intensive & critical care nursing.

[16]  A Kitson,et al.  Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. , 1998, Quality in health care : QHC.

[17]  The application of evidence-based priority setting in a District Health Authority. , 1997, Journal of public health medicine.

[18]  S. Leeder,et al.  Priority setting in health care: unburdening from the burden of disease , 1977, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[19]  C. Donaldson,et al.  Economics, Public Health and Health Care Purchasing: The Tayside Experience of Programme Budgeting and Marginal Analysis , 1996, Journal of health services research & policy.

[20]  G. Mooney,et al.  Public health and economics in tandem: programme budgeting, marginal analysis and priority setting in practice. , 1995, Health policy.

[21]  D. Cohen Marginal analysis in practice: an alternative to needs assessment for contracting health care , 1994, BMJ.

[22]  S. Farrar,et al.  Needs assessment: developing an economic approach. , 1993, Health policy.

[23]  G. Mooney,et al.  Choices for Health Care: A Practical Introduction to The Economics of Health Provision , 1986 .

[24]  E. Guba,et al.  Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.* , 1985 .

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .