Four experiments investigated whether subjects understand the supposedly generic he generically. In Experiment I, subjects responded YES if an auditorily presented sentence could refer to a female and otherwise NO. Responses were 98% correct for sentences containing sex-specific nouns and pronouns, but 87% incorrect (i.e., NO) for sentences containing generic he . In Experiment II, subjects heard identical sentences but responded YES if the sentence could refer to a male. Responses were 99% correct, indicating high availability of the concept “male” for sentences containing generic he . In Experiment III, responses were 97% incorrect with she substituted for he in otherwise identical generic sentences. Experiment IV determined the effect of removing the pronouns from the sentences. The results inspired a general model of processes underlying the comprehension and production of pronouns.
[1]
Cathryn Adamsky.
Changes in Pronominal Usage.
,
1976
.
[2]
M. Garrett,et al.
The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences
,
1973,
Memory & cognition.
[3]
A QUANTITATIVE METHOD FOR MEASURING SEX “BIAS” IN STANDARDIZED TESTS1
,
1974
.
[4]
M. Boden.
Arti cial Intelligence and Natural Man
,
1977
.
[5]
W. Martyna,et al.
What Does ‘He’ Mean?Use of the Generic Masculine
,
1978
.
[6]
H. H. Clark,et al.
Psychology and language : an introduction to psycholinguistics
,
1979
.
[7]
Alma Graham,et al.
The Making of a Nonsexist Dictionary.
,
1974
.
[8]
Words and Women: New Language in New Times
,
1976
.
[9]
H. H. Clark,et al.
In search of referents for nouns and pronouns
,
1979
.