Application of jet propellant-8 to premixed charge ignition combustion in a single-cylinder diesel engine

The aviation fuel, jet propellant-8, was applied to premixed charge ignition combustion as well as conventional combustion in a single-cylinder diesel engine and was compared with diesel fuel. The engine performance and emissions were tested with and without exhaust gas recirculation under two operating conditions. The liquid- and vapor-phase penetration of diesel fuel and jet propellant-8 were also compared by Mie-scattering and Schlieren method under evaporating conditions using a constant-volume chamber. It was observed that jet propellant-8 exhibited slightly longer vapor-phase penetration and evidently shorter liquid-phase penetration compared with diesel fuel due to the lower distillation temperature and density of jet propellant-8. However, despite the faster evaporation rate of jet propellant-8, it was found that the ignition delay with jet propellant-8 was 2–3 crank angle degrees longer than that with diesel fuel due to its lower cetane number. This result was consistent for all operating conditions and combustion regimes. Jet propellant-8 also showed lower nitrogen oxides (NOx) and smoke emissions for both combustion regimes under the low-load condition because of locally leaner air–fuel mixture caused by longer ignition delay, higher volatility, and lower aromatic contents. As the engine load increased, jet propellant-8 emitted more NOx under conventional combustion regime due to the more vigorous premixed burn phase compared with diesel fuel. With exhaust gas recirculation, jet propellant-8 showed an improved trade-off relationship between NOx and smoke emissions for both combustion regimes due to its better evaporation characteristics and lower aromatic contents. Premixed charge ignition combustion with jet propellant-8 emitted lower smoke than conventional combustion with jet propellant-8 under near-zero NOx level.

[1]  Radu Florea,et al.  Comparison of In-Cylinder Soot Evolution in an Optically Accessible Engine Fueled with JP-8 and ULSD , 2012 .

[2]  Dennis N. Assanis,et al.  Effect of fuel cetane number on a premixed diesel combustion mode , 2009 .

[3]  Mingfa Yao,et al.  Progress and recent trends in homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engines , 2009 .

[4]  Dimitrios T. Hountalas,et al.  Single Fuel Research Program Comparative Results of the Use of JP-8 Aviation Fuel versus Diesel Fuel on a Direct Injection and Indirect Injection Diesel Engine , 2006 .

[5]  A. Maiboom,et al.  Experimental study of various effects of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) on combustion and emissions of an automotive direct injection diesel engine , 2008 .

[6]  Yoann Viollet,et al.  Enabling High Efficiency Direct Injection Engine with Naphtha Fuel through Partially Premixed Charge Compression Ignition Combustion , 2012 .

[7]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Spray Targeting to Minimize Soot and CO Formation in Premixed Charge Compression Ignition (PCCI) Combustion with a HSDI Diesel Engine , 2006 .

[8]  Zhengqing Chen,et al.  Combustion and emissions characteristics of high n-butanol/diesel ratio blend in a heavy-duty diesel engine and EGR impact , 2014 .

[9]  Paul I. Lacey,et al.  Effect of Low-Lubricity Fuels on Diesel Injection Pumps - Part I: Field Performance , 1992 .

[10]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays , 1998 .

[11]  Hua Zhao,et al.  The Dilution, Chemical, and Thermal Effects of Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Diesel Engine Emissions - Part 1: Effect of Reducing Inlet Charge Oxygen , 1996 .

[12]  Nandgaonkar,et al.  Performance, Emission and Pump Wear Analysis of JP-8 Fuel for Military Use on a 558 kW, CIDI Diesel Engine , 2010 .

[13]  Bengt Johansson,et al.  Investigation of the Combustion Characteristics with Focus on Partially Premixed Combustion in a Heavy Duty Engine , 2008 .

[14]  Y. Kidoguchi,et al.  Effects of Fuel Properties on Combustion and Emission Characteristics of a Direct-Injection Diesel Engine , 2000 .

[15]  Charles J. Mueller,et al.  Effects of Injection Pressure, Injection-Rate Shape, and Heat Release on Liquid Length , 2012 .

[16]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[17]  Sidney J. Lestz,et al.  Technology Demonstration of U.S. Army Ground Materiel Operating on Aviation Kerosene Fuel , 1992 .

[18]  Sanghoon Kook,et al.  Liquid length and vapor penetration of conventional, Fischer–Tropsch, coal-derived, and surrogate fuel sprays at high-temperature and high-pressure ambient conditions , 2012 .

[19]  Hiroshi Sono,et al.  PCCI Operation with Fuel Injection Timing Set Close to TDC , 2006 .

[20]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Impact of High Sulfur Military JP-8 Fuel on Heavy Duty Diesel Engine EGR Cooler Condensate , 2008 .

[21]  Dimitrios T. Hountalas,et al.  Experimental investigation of the performance and exhaust emissions of a swirl chamber diesel engine using JP‐8 aviation fuel , 1997 .

[22]  Y. Kidoguchi,et al.  Effects of Aromatic Hydrocarbons on Fuel Decomposition and Oxidation Processes in Diesel Combustion , 2005 .

[23]  Choongsik Bae,et al.  Spray and combustion characteristics of gasoline and diesel in a direct injection compression ignition engine , 2013 .

[24]  Choongsik Bae,et al.  Application of JP-8 in a heavy duty diesel engine , 2011 .

[25]  Choongsik Bae,et al.  Combustion process of JP-8 and fossil Diesel fuel in a heavy duty diesel engine using two-color thermometry , 2012 .

[26]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Scaling Liquid-Phase Fuel Penetration in Diesel Sprays Based on Mixing-Limited Vaporization , 1999 .

[27]  Tim Lutz,et al.  Brake Thermal Efficiency Improvements of a Commercially Based Diesel Engine Modified for Operation on JP 8 Fuel , 2011 .

[28]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Impact of military JP-8 fuel on heavy-duty diesel engine performance and emissions , 2007 .