World rare earths trade network: Patterns, relations and role characteristics

Due to the uneven geographical distribution of rare earths (RE), most countries obtain RE on the international market. Trade patterns and trading countries’ role characteristics are two important aspects to understand the current status of world RE trade and furthermore to formulate RE trade policies for each trading country. A complex network theory is adopted to analyze the world RE trade based on the trading data of 2011–2015. The results show that world RE trade favors a tendency towards collectivization since 146 trading countries only form three trade communities. Of these communities, the one headed by the United States, China, Japan, and Germany, has the largest clustering coefficient and has the greatest effect on the world RE trade. Moreover, the average path length valued by 2.294 steps in the network shows that the trading countries are quite close to each other, i.e., building up trade relations between any two countries needs an average path length of only 2.294 steps. Based on the role characteristics analysis of the degree centrality, strength centrality, closeness centrality, eigenvector centrality, and betweenness centrality, our study characterized the competing and complementary relationships between the major trading countries. Finally, the policy implications for different trading countries are proposed.

[1]  Haizhong An,et al.  The evolution of communities in the international oil trade network , 2014 .

[2]  Gareth P. Hatch,et al.  Dynamics in the Global Market for Rare Earths , 2012 .

[3]  Vincent D. Blondel.  A counterexample to a simultaneous stabilization condition for systems with identical unstable poles and zeros , 1991 .

[4]  Yalin Lei,et al.  Production forecast of China׳s rare earths based on the Generalized Weng model and policy recommendations , 2015 .

[5]  Ying Fan,et al.  The state's role and position in international trade: A complex network perspective , 2014 .

[6]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[7]  Bernhard Voelkl,et al.  A social network analysis of primate groups , 2009, Primates.

[8]  K. A. Gschneidner.  The Rare Earth Crisis—The Supply/Demand Situation for 2010-2015 , 2015 .

[9]  Zhanheng Chen,et al.  Global rare earth resources and scenarios of future rare earth industry , 2011 .

[10]  Vasco M. Carvalho.  From micro to macro via production networks , 2014 .

[11]  Haizhong An,et al.  Indirect energy flow between industrial sectors in China: A complex network approach , 2016 .

[12]  Nabeel A. Mancheri,et al.  World trade in rare earths, Chinese export restrictions, and implications , 2015 .

[13]  G. R. Ballantyne,et al.  Rare earths supply chains: current status, constraints and opportunities , 2014 .

[14]  K. G. Boogaart,et al.  The development of the market for rare earth elements: Insights from economic theory , 2015 .

[15]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[16]  Ying Fan,et al.  Competition, Transmission and Pattern Evolution: A Network Analysis of Global Oil Trade , 2014 .

[17]  L. Tajoli,et al.  The World Trade Network , 2011 .

[18]  Biliana Alexandrova-Kabadjova,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Mexican Banking System's Network and Its Implications for Systemic Risk , 2012 .

[19]  Huajiao Li,et al.  Features and evolution of international crude oil trade relationships: A trading-based network analysis , 2014 .

[20]  Yalin Lei,et al.  Assessment of Trading Partners for China's Rare Earth Exports Using a Decision Analytic Approach , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  Frances Wall,et al.  Rare Earth Elements , 2013, Encyclopedia of Geology.

[22]  Jianping Ge,et al.  Spatial Dynamics of the Communities and the Role of Major Countries in the International Rare Earths Trade: A Complex Network Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[23]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Saleem H. Ali,et al.  Sustainability of Rare Earths—An Overview of the State of Knowledge , 2013 .

[25]  Rachel Y. Tang,et al.  China's Rare Earth Industry and Export Regime: Economic and Trade Implications for the United States , 2012 .

[26]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  On variants of shortest-path betweenness centrality and their generic computation , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[27]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[28]  Yalin Lei,et al.  An adjustment in regulation policies and its effects on market supply: Game analysis for China’s rare earths , 2015 .

[29]  J. Wübbeke.  Rare earth elements in China: Policies and narratives of reinventing an industry , 2013 .

[30]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[31]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[32]  H. An,et al.  The Impact of Countries’ Roles on the International Photovoltaic Trade Pattern: The Complex Networks Analysis , 2016 .