The importance of the social environment for physically active lifestyle--results from an international study.

Physically active lifestyles are regularly associated with improved health and quality of life. Differences in lifestyles in society can partly be understood through the differences in the social and physical environment. This study examines the relationships between reported physical activity, and the extent of perceived support for physical activity in the physical and policy environment (e.g. facilities, programmes and other opportunities), and in the social environment. The data for the study come from a cross-cultural health policy study called MAREPS. In total, 3342 adults, 18 years or older, from six countries (Belgium, Finland, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland) were interviewed via telephone. Respondents were categorised as active or inactive according to self-reported physical activity. Social environmental factors and physical and policy environmental factors were also assessed. The analysis of the data was informed by social cognitive theory, although the study was not originally designed for this purpose. Sixty-eight percent of females and 70% of males were active. The proportions of active and inactive varied by countries to a great extent. The strongest independent predictor of being physically active was social environment. Those who perceived low social support from their personal environment (i.e. family, friends, school and workplace) were more than twice as likely to be sedentary compared to those who reported high social support from their personal environment. Specific knowledge of the programmes and actions for physical activity and sport was also a strong predictor of being active. A supportive physical and policy environment was not associated with participation in physical activity as strongly as had been anticipated. The variation between countries was stronger predictor of being active than the physical and policy environment variables. This study generates the hypotheses and raises the questions that in a preliminary way, there appears to be some relationships between aspects of physical and social environment and physical activity participation. However, future research is needed to refine and clarify this.

[1]  K. Glanz,et al.  Health Behavior and Health Education , 1990 .

[2]  D B Abrams,et al.  A comparative evaluation of a restrictive smoking policy in a general hospital. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[3]  G. Lüschen,et al.  Health Promotion Policy in Europe: Rationality, Impact, and Evaluation , 1999 .

[4]  R J Shephard,et al.  Worksite physical activity interventions. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  J. Calder Survey research methods , 1998, Medical education.

[6]  C. Caspersen,et al.  Distance between homes and exercise facilities related to frequency of exercise among San Diego residents. , 1990, Public health reports.

[7]  J F Sallis,et al.  Insufficiently active Australian college students: perceived personal, social, and environmental influences. , 1999, Preventive medicine.

[8]  A. King,et al.  Support for Policy Interventions to Increase Physical Activity in Rural Missouri , 1998, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[9]  D. Sommers,et al.  A longitudinal analysis , 1992 .

[10]  Fred Fridinger,et al.  Environmental and Policy Approaches to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Through Physical Activity: Issues and Opportunities , 1995, Health education quarterly.

[11]  J. Wardle,et al.  Leisure-time physical exercise: prevalence, attitudinal correlates, and behavioral correlates among young Europeans from 21 countries. , 1997, Preventive medicine.

[12]  R J Shephard,et al.  Worksite Fitness and Exercise Programs: A Review of Methodology and Health Impact , 1996, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[13]  J. House,et al.  Structures and Processes of Social Support , 1988 .

[14]  R. Turner,et al.  Social support and social structure: a descriptive epidemiology. , 1994, Journal of health and social behavior.

[15]  G M Christenson,et al.  A multivariate study of determinants of vigorous exercise in a community sample. , 1989, Preventive medicine.

[16]  Tc. Antonucci,et al.  Social Supports, and Social Relation-ships , 1990 .

[17]  H. Gotham,et al.  Determinants of exercise among children. II. A longitudinal analysis. , 1998, Preventive medicine.

[18]  H A Feldman,et al.  The effects of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health upon psychosocial determinants of diet and physical activity behavior. , 1996, Preventive medicine.

[19]  A. Bauman,et al.  Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  N. Anderssen Physical Activity and Behavioral Medicine , 1999, Journal of health psychology.

[21]  Tom Baranowski,et al.  How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact : Social learning theory , 1990 .

[22]  K. Glanz,et al.  Health behavior and health education : theory, research, and practice , 1991 .

[23]  D S Nice,et al.  Physical fitness gains following simple environmental change. , 1991, American journal of preventive medicine.

[24]  J F Sallis,et al.  Predictors of adoption and maintenance of vigorous physical activity in men and women. , 1992, Preventive medicine.

[25]  P Oja,et al.  Is long-term maintenance of health-related physical activity possible? An analysis of concepts and evidence. , 1996, Health education research.

[26]  C. J. Frankish,et al.  A review of relationships between active living and determinants of health. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[27]  J. Sallis,et al.  Assessing perceived physical environmental variables that may influence physical activity. , 1997, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[28]  J. Sallis,et al.  Physical Activity and Behavioral Medicine , 1998 .

[29]  R. Forthofer,et al.  Promoting physical activity and a healthful diet among children: results of a school-based intervention study. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[30]  C. D'Arcy,et al.  Measuring the occurrence of health–promoting interactions with the environment , 1977, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[31]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Physical activity patterns in a diverse population of women. , 1999, Preventive medicine.

[32]  Ethel Shanas,et al.  Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences , 1991 .

[33]  M. Pratt,et al.  Policy as intervention: environmental and policy approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[34]  T. Patterson,et al.  The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. , 1987, Preventive medicine.

[35]  R. Brownson,et al.  Environmental and Policy Interventions to Control Tobacco Use and Prevent Cardiovascular Disease , 1995, Health education quarterly.

[36]  E. Vartiainen,et al.  Twenty-year trends in coronary risk factors in north Karelia and in other areas of Finland. , 1994, International journal of epidemiology.

[37]  G. Welk,et al.  Effects of physical activity interventions in youth. Review and synthesis. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[38]  T. Antonucci,et al.  Negative effects of close social relations , 1998 .

[39]  R. Donovan,et al.  Factors influencing the use of physical activity facilities: results from qualitative research , 1996 .

[40]  T. Baranowski,et al.  Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions. How are we doing? How might we do better? , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[41]  J. House,et al.  Social relationships and health. , 1988, Science.

[42]  S. Kelder,et al.  Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity. The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. CATCH collaborative group. , 1996, JAMA.

[43]  E. McAuley,et al.  Are there different determinants of the frequency, intensity, and duration of physical activity? , 1994, Behavioral medicine.