Requirements Management – Novel Perspectives and Challenges

This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 12442 “Requirements Management – Novel Perspectives and Challenges”. Changes in computational paradigms and capabilities that draw upon platform strategies, web services, and virtualization of both application services and development platforms have significant implications for views of modularity and requirements evolution, complexity of RE tasks, and the economics of system development and operations. The aim of the seminar was to bring together experts from multiple fields to discuss models and theories around these changes. Three key challenges and associated solution ideas were addressed, namely (1) to better deal with context changes and business goal management to reduce the “black swan” rate of badly failed large projects, (2) to exploit recent theories of technological and institutional evolution to understand better how to control complexity and leverage it for innovation at the same time, and (3) the demand for runtime re-organization of existing large-scale systems with respect to new operational goals such as energy efficiency. Future RE must see itself as the marketplace where responsibility for all these complexities and evolutionary steps is traded. Seminar 28.–31. October, 2012 – www.dagstuhl.de/12442 1998 ACM Subject Classification D.2.1 Requirements, D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques, D.2.11 Software Architectures

[1]  M. Jelinek,et al.  Product Innovation Processes in Small Firms: Combining Entrepreneurial Effectuation and Managerial Causation , 2014 .

[2]  Neil A. Ernst,et al.  Agile Requirements Evolution via Paraconsistent Reasoning , 2012, CAiSE.

[3]  Petra Andries,et al.  Dynamics of effectuation and causation in technology-based new ventures (INTERACTIVE PAPER) , 2012 .

[4]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  The brave new world of design requirements , 2011, Inf. Syst..

[5]  Immj Isabelle Reymen,et al.  External designers in product design processes of small manufacturing firms , 2011 .

[6]  Didar Zowghi,et al.  On the Role of Ambiguity in RE , 2010, REFSQ.

[7]  Stuart A Read,et al.  Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices , 2009 .

[8]  Stephen Fickas,et al.  Designs Can Talk: A Case of Feedback for Design Evolution in Assistive Technology , 2009 .

[9]  Chang Yan Product development process modelling based on design structure matrix family , 2006 .

[10]  Didar Zowghi,et al.  On the interplay between consistency, completeness, and correctness in requirements evolution , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[11]  Didar Zowghi,et al.  The Three Cs of Requirements : Consistency , Completeness , and Correctness , 2002 .

[12]  Ken Schwaber,et al.  Agile Software Development with SCRUM , 2001 .

[13]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[14]  Pamela Zave,et al.  Deriving Specifications from Requirements: an Example , 1995, 1995 17th International Conference on Software Engineering.