External oligonucleotide standards enable cross laboratory comparison and exchange of real-time quantitative PCR data

The quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is widely utilized for gene expression analysis. However, the lack of robust strategies for cross laboratory data comparison hinders the ability to collaborate or perform large multicentre studies conducted at different sites. In this study we introduced and validated a workflow that employs universally applicable, quantifiable external oligonucleotide standards to address this question. Using the proposed standards and data-analysis procedure, we obtained a perfect concordance between expression values from eight different genes in 366 patient samples measured on three different qPCR instruments and matching software, reagents, plates and seals, demonstrating the power of this strategy to detect and correct inter-run variation and to enable exchange of data between different laboratories, even when not using the same qPCR platform.

[1]  Ruth Ladenstein,et al.  Predicting outcomes for children with neuroblastoma using a multigene-expression signature: a retrospective SIOPEN/COG/GPOH study. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  G. Sherlock,et al.  The prognostic role of a gene signature from tumorigenic breast-cancer cells. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  M. Kimmel,et al.  Conflict of interest statement. None declared. , 2010 .

[4]  Stephen A Bustin,et al.  Reliability of real-time reverse-transcription PCR in clinical diagnostics: gold standard or substandard? , 2009, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[5]  Chris F. Taylor,et al.  RDML: structured language and reporting guidelines for real-time quantitative PCR data , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Digital PCR. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  D. Ginzinger.  Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream. , 2002, Experimental hematology.

[8]  Tania Nolan,et al.  SPUD: a quantitative PCR assay for the detection of inhibitors in nucleic acid preparations. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.

[9]  S. Bustin.  Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. , 2000, Journal of molecular endocrinology.

[10]  C. Wittwer,et al.  Detection of rare mRNAs via quantitative RT-PCR. , 1992, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[11]  Jo Vandesompele,et al.  RTPrimerDB: the portal for real-time PCR primers and probes , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  J. Willey,et al.  Expression measurement of many genes simultaneously by quantitative RT-PCR using standardized mixtures of competitive templates. , 1998, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[13]  M. Herrler,et al.  Linear mRNA amplification from as little as 5 ng total RNA for global gene expression analysis. , 2004, BioTechniques.

[14]  G. Mortier,et al.  qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data , 2007, Genome Biology.

[15]  Anne Kopf-Sill,et al.  Novel isothermal, linear nucleic acid amplification systems for highly multiplexed applications. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  V. Beneš,et al.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  F. Speleman,et al.  Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes , 2002, Genome Biology.

[18]  J. Silver,et al.  Nanoliter scale PCR with TaqMan detection. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.