Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Light-Vehicle Field Operational Test Methodology and Results Report

This document presents the methodology and results from the light-vehicle field operational test conducted as part of the Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems program. These findings are the result of analyses performed by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute to examine the effects of a prototype integrated crash warning system on driving behavior and driver acceptance. The light-vehicle platform included four integrated crash-warning subsystems (forward crash, curve speed, lateral drift, and lane-change/merge crash warnings) installed on a fleet of Honda Accords driven by 108 lay-drivers for a period of six weeks each. Each vehicle was instrumented to capture detailed data on the driving environment, driver behavior, warning system activity, and vehicle kinematics. Data on driver acceptance was collected through a post-drive survey, debriefings, and focus groups. Key findings indicate that use of the integrated crash warning system resulted in improvements in lane-keeping, fewer lane departures, and increased turn signal use. Research also indicated that drivers were slightly more likely to maintain shorter headways with the integrated system. No negative behavioral adaptation effects were observed as a result of drivers’ involvement in secondary task behaviors. Drivers generally accepted the integrated system, and 72 percent of the drivers reported they would like to have such a system in their personal vehicles. Drivers also reported that the blind-spot detection component of the lane-change/merge crash warning system was the most useful aspect of the integrated system.

[1]  James R. Sayer,et al.  The Effects of Secondary Tasks on Naturalistic Driving Performance , 2005 .

[2]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems (IVBSS) Light Vehicle Platform Field Operational Test Data Analysis Plan , 2009 .

[3]  A. Scott,et al.  Ann Arbor , 1980 .

[4]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems field operational test plan , 2008 .

[5]  Dot Hs Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems (IVBSS) , 2008 .

[6]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Integrated vehicle-based safety systems (IVBSS) : human factors and driver-vehicle interface (DVI) summary report , 2008 .

[7]  Dick de Waard,et al.  A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics , 1997 .

[8]  Dot Hs Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Heavy-Truck On-Road Test Report , 2008 .

[9]  Zaiyang Tang,et al.  System performance guidelines for a prototype integrated vehicle based safety system (IVBSS) – light vehicle platform , 2008 .

[10]  Marvin C. McCallum,et al.  Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety System Heavy Truck Driver-Vehicle Interface (DVI) Specifications (Final Version) , 2007 .

[11]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety System (IVBSS): Heavy Truck Extended Pilot Test Summary Report , 2009 .

[12]  Zaiyang Tang,et al.  Functional Requirements for Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety System (IVBSS) – Heavy Truck Platform , 2008 .

[13]  James R. Sayer,et al.  Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Heavy Truck Verification Test Plan , 2008 .

[14]  Marvin C. McCallum,et al.  Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety System Heavy Truck Driver-Vehicle Interface (DVI) Stage 1 Jury Drive Protocol , 2007 .