Adaptive suppression of biodynamic interference in helmet-mounted displays and head teleoperation

This paper addresses errors caused by vibration or turbulence in airborne helmet displays and teleoperation. It is shown by analysis and computer simulations that a modified version of the least-mean-squares adaptive noise suppression algorithm facilitates the separation of the large voluntary head movements from the vibrationinduced small nonvoluntary head motion. Thus, the effects of the biodynamic interference can be essentially removed. The results also indicate that errors in head-tracking teleoperated devices can essentially be suppressed. Extensive man-in-the-loop laboratory simulations that validate the method are described. YSTEM teleoperation by pilot head motion and presentation of computer-gene rated symbols and flight information in helmet-mounte d displays is emerging as a promising technology in modern avionic systems. Head teleoperation is potentially an effective method for instinctive and rapid aiming of radar antennas, missile seeker heads, or laser designators. In addition, it relieves the hands of the pilot for other vital manual tasks in increasingly complex airborne environments. Helmet-mounted displays (HMD) can, in principle, be the ultimate solution in merging computer-generated displays with the outside scene, thus embracing the entire field of view available to the pilot. Therefore, the HMD potentially relieves the pilot from the troublesome need to share his attention between the all-aspect outside scene and a restrictive cockpitmounted panel or head-up display. However, a potential shortcoming of head teleoperation and HMDs is their vulnerability to biodynamic interference resulting from vibration, atmospheric turbulence, or self-induced vehicle motion. These interferences can cause substantial random aiming errors and apparent display blurring that may seriously impair pilot performance. Two kinds of biodynamic interference exist, namely, 1) additive interferences due to nonvoluntary limb motions caused by, and correlated with, vibration,1'2 and 2) nonadditive interferences resulting from the disturbances in the central nervous system caused by the body and head vibrations, uncorrelated with them, but monotonically increasing with their intensity.3'4 Head vibration causes relative angular motion of the HMD with respect to the line of sight of the eye, which is inertially stabilized by the vestibular system. Consequently, as a result of the apparent display shift, image blurring occurs, resulting in substantial degradation of reading speed and probability of correct character recognition.5'6 This neuromotor stabilization, known as the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), is effective in the frequency range of 2-10 Hz.7 Wells and Griffin6'8 conducted experiments to cancel this blurring by shifting the display in the opposite direction with an amplitude equal to the measured head motion which was determined by an approximate double integration of head angular acceleration. They succeeded in demonstrating the effectiveness of the concept, but the imperfection of the integration caused substantial transients in the display position in the presence of large angular head motion.

[1]  Arthur J. Grunwald,et al.  Adaptive filtering of biodynamic stick feedthrough in manipulation tasks on board moving platforms , 1988 .

[2]  M. Griffin,et al.  Benefits of helmet-mounted display image stabilisation under whole-body vibration. , 1984, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  A comparison of adaptive algorithms based on the methods of steepest descent and random search , 1976 .

[4]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Predicting the effects of vertical vibration frequency, combinations of frequencies and viewing distance on the reading of numeric displays , 1980 .

[5]  William H. Levison,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Environmental Factors on Human Control and Information Processing. , 1976 .

[6]  H. R. Jex,et al.  Problems in modeling man machine control behavior in biodynamic environments , 1972 .

[7]  Arthur J. Grunwald,et al.  Suppression of Biodynamic Disturbances and Pilot-Induced Oscillations by Adaptive Filtering , 1984 .

[8]  G. Barnes,et al.  Vision during angular oscillation: the dynamic interaction of visual and vestibular mechanisms. , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[9]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  A Review and Investigation of Aiming and Tracking Performance with Head-Mounted Sights , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  M J Griffin,et al.  Flight trial of a helmet-mounted display image stabilisation system. , 1987, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[11]  A J Benson,et al.  Visual-vestibular interaction in the control of eye movement. , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[12]  B. Widrow,et al.  Stationary and nonstationary learning characteristics of the LMS adaptive filter , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Shmuel J. Merhav Adaptive suppression of biodynamic interference in helmet mounted and head down displays , 1988 .

[14]  David G. Messerschmitt,et al.  Adaptive Filters: Structures, Algorithms and Applications , 1984 .