An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives

Current syntactic accounts of English resultatives are based on the assumption that result XPs are predicated of underlying direct objects. This assumption has helped to explain the presence of reflexive pronouns with some intransitive verbs but not others and the apparent lack of result XPs predicated of subjects of transitive verbs. We present problems for and counterexamples to some of the basic assumptions of the syntactic approach, which undermine its explanatory power. We develop an alternative account that appeals to principles governing the well-formedness of event structure and the event structure-to-syntax mapping. This account covers the data on intransitive verbs and predicts the distribution of subject-predicated result XPs with transitive verbs.

[1]  Lori S. Levin,et al.  Papers in lexical-functional grammar , 1983 .

[2]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  Argument Extension by Lexical Adjunction , 1997, J. Semant..

[3]  T. R. Rapoport,et al.  Structure, aspect, and the predicate , 1999 .

[4]  Teun Hoekstra,et al.  Small clause results , 1988 .

[5]  Sally Rice,et al.  Towards a Transitive Prototype: Evidence from Some Atypical English Passives , 1987 .

[6]  Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng.  Resultative Compounds and Lexical Relational Structures , 1997 .

[7]  B. Levin,et al.  Scalar Structure Underlies Telicity in "Degree Achievements" , 1999 .

[8]  Patrick M. Farrell,et al.  Grammatical relations : a cross-theoretical perspective , 1990 .

[9]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .

[10]  C. S. Smith.  JESPERSEN'S 'MOVE AND CHANGE' CLASS AND CAUSATIVE VERBS IN ENGLISH , 1978 .

[11]  David M. Perlmutter.  Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis , 1978 .

[12]  S. Pinker.  Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure , 1989 .

[13]  Ray Jackendoff.  TWISTIN' THE NIGHT AWAY , 1997 .

[14]  Van Valin,et al.  Semantic Parameters of Split Intransitivity , 1990 .

[15]  Scott Delancey,et al.  Notes on Agentivity and Causation , 1984 .

[16]  R. Sybesma.  On the ambiguity of riding tired , 1993 .

[17]  David R. Dowty.  Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[18]  Hiroaki Sato.  RESULTATIVE ATTRIBUTES AND GB PRINCIPLES , 1987 .

[19]  Emmon W. Bach,et al.  Control in Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[20]  T. Tsunoda.  Remarks on transitivity , 1985, Journal of Linguistics.

[21]  R. Washio,et al.  Resultatives, Compositionality and Language Variation , 1997 .

[22]  Yafei Li,et al.  On V-V compounds in Chinese , 1990 .

[23]  B. Levin.  Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[24]  C. Tenny.  Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness , 1987 .

[25]  E. Reuland,et al.  Lexical and conceptual structure , 1993 .

[26]  C. Fillmore.  The case for case reopened , 1977 .

[27]  Carol Lee Tenny,et al.  Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface , 1994 .

[28]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted:the role of information structure in argument distribution , 2001 .

[29]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[30]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar , 1989 .

[31]  G. Miller,et al.  Linguistic theory and psychological reality , 1982 .

[32]  James D. McCawley,et al.  Conversational Implicature and the Lexicon , 1978 .

[33]  Savas Tsohatsidis.  Meanings and prototypes : studies in linguistic categorization , 1990 .

[34]  M. Krifka.  The Origins of Telicity , 1998 .

[35]  Cornelia Maria Verspoor,et al.  Contextually-Dependent Lexical Semantics , 1997 .

[36]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[37]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure , 1995 .

[38]  John Haiman,et al.  Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion , 1985 .

[39]  R. Jackendoff.  The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in english , 1996 .

[40]  L. Talmy.  Semantic Causative Types , 1976 .

[41]  Susan Rothstein,et al.  Case and NP licensing , 1992 .

[42]  C. Tenny.  The aspectual interface hypothesis , 1989 .

[43]  D. Davidson.  The Individuation of Events , 1969 .

[44]  Susan Rothstein,et al.  Secondary Predication and Aspectual Structure , 2000 .

[45]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[46]  R. Jackendoff.  The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory , 1987 .

[47]  Ingrid Kaufmann,et al.  O- and D-Predicates: A Semantic Approach to the Unaccusative-Unergative Distinction , 1995, J. Semant..

[48]  G. V. Wyngaerd.  Aspects Of (Un)Boundedness , 1998 .

[49]  Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng,et al.  On the Argument Structure of Resultative Compounds , 1994 .

[50]  Susan Rothstein.  Events and Grammar , 2001 .

[51]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution , 1992 .

[52]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  Emmon Bach,et al.  In defense of passive , 1980 .

[54]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  Two Structures for Compositionally Derived Events , 1999 .

[55]  W. Bruce Croft.  Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations , 1990 .

[56]  N. Rescher,et al.  Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel , 1969 .

[57]  M. Shibatani.  The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus , 1976 .

[58]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  Cross-linguistic patterns of resultatives , 1998 .

[59]  Claudia Leacock,et al.  Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches , 2000 .

[60]  Masayoshi Shibatani,et al.  The grammar of causative constructions , 1976 .

[61]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The Generative Lexicon , 1995, CL.

[62]  Luigi Burzio,et al.  Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach , 1986 .

[63]  Ingrid Kaufmann,et al.  What Is an (Im-)possible Verb? Restrictions on Semantic Form and Their Consequences for Argument Structure* , 1995 .

[64]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Lexical Matters: CSLI Lecture Notes 24 , 1992 .

[65]  Frederik Theodoor Visser,et al.  An Historical Syntax of the English Language , 2002 .

[66]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The syntax of event structure , 1991, Cognition.

[67]  Robert Fiengo,et al.  Surface Structure: The Interface of Autonomous Components , 1981 .

[68]  Adele E. Goldberg,et al.  It Can't Go Down the Chimney Up: Paths and the English Resultative , 1991 .

[69]  Sten Vikner,et al.  Obligatory Adjuncts and the Structure of Events , 1993 .

[70]  Ovid J. L. Tzeng,et al.  In honor of William S-Y. Wang : interdisciplinary studies on language and language change , 1994 .

[71]  C. Rosen,et al.  The relational structure of reflexive clauses : evidence from Italian , 1988 .