Paying attention to speaking rate

Variability in speaking rate results in a many-to-many mapping between acoustic properties in speech and the linguistic interpretation of an utterance. In order to recognize the phonetic structure of an utterance, listeners must calibrate their phonetic decisions against the rate at which the speech was produced. This process of rate normalization is fast and effective allowing listeners to maintain phonetic constancy in spite of changes in speaking rate. Most of the research on rate normalization has investigated the sources of information used by listeners to determine the speaking rate. There is an assumption in much of this research that the normalization process is a passive, automatized filtering process that strips the effects of rate variation away from the signal prior to recognition. The study starts from a different perspective by assuming that speech perception is carried out by an active perceptual process that is specifically needed to address the lack of invariance problem (Nusbaum and Henly). This perspective predicts that increased variability from any source, including rate variability, should increase the cognitive load during speech perception. The results support this prediction.

[1]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Speech Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure , 1994 .

[2]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  G. Fant,et al.  Auditory analysis and perception of speech , 1975 .

[4]  J. L. Miller,et al.  A distinction between the effects of sentential speaking rate and semantic congruity on word identification , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  M. P. Haggard,et al.  Vocal Tract Normalisation as Demonstrated by Reaction Times , 1975 .

[6]  J L Miller,et al.  How the components of speaking rate influence perception of phonetic segments. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  T. M. Nearey.  Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  H. S. Gopal,et al.  A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J L Miller,et al.  Some effects of speaking rate on the production of /b/ and /w/. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  L. Gerstman.  Classification of self-normalized vowels , 1968 .

[11]  A. Liberman,et al.  Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[13]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: Effects of temporal distance , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  Speech, Perception, Production and Linguistic Structure , 1992 .

[15]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Eileen C. Schwab,et al.  Pattern recognition by humans and machines , 1986 .

[17]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Speech sounds and features , 1973 .

[18]  P C Gordon,et al.  Induction of rate-dependent processing by coarse-grained aspects of speech , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[20]  W. A. Ainsworth,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors in Vowel Judgements , 1975 .

[21]  R. Port,et al.  Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Joanne L. Miller,et al.  Speech Perception , 1990, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[23]  Eileen C. Schwab,et al.  CHAPTER 4 – The Role of Attention and Active Processing in Speech Perception* , 1986 .

[24]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[25]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.