Achieving Budget-Balance with Vickrey-Based Payment Schemes in Combinatorial Exchanges

Generalized Vickrey mechanisms have received wide attention in the combinatorial auction design literature because they are efficient and strategy-proof. However, it is well known that it is impossible for an exchange, with multiple buyers and sellers and voluntary participation, to be efficient and budget-balanced, even relaxing dominant strategy requirements. Except for special cases, a market-maker in an efficient exchange must make more payments than it collects. Taking a constructive approach, we clear exchanges to maximize reported surplus, and explore the efficiency effects of different budget-balanced payment rules. The payment rules are formulated to minimize the distance to Vickrey payments, under different metrics. Different rules lead to different levels of truth-revelation, and therefore efficiency. Experimental and theoretical analysis suggest a simple Threshold scheme, which gives surplus to agents with payments further than a certain threshold value from their Vickrey payments, has good properties. The scheme exploits agent uncertainty about bids from other agents to reduce manipulation opportunities.

[1]  E. H. Clarke Multipart pricing of public goods , 1971 .

[2]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Combinatorial auctions for supply chain formation , 2000, EC '00.

[3]  R. McAfee,et al.  A dominant strategy double auction , 1992 .

[4]  Joseph A. Swanson,et al.  Special Issue: Experimental Economics in Practice: The First Use of a Combined-Value Auction for Transportation Services , 2002, Interfaces.

[5]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms , 2000, EC '00.

[6]  K. Arrow The Property Rights Doctrine and Demand Revelation under Incomplete Information**This work was supported by National Science Foundation under Grant No. SOC75-21820 at the Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University. , 1979 .

[7]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[8]  C. d'Aspremont,et al.  Incentives and incomplete information , 1979 .

[9]  M. Satterthwaite,et al.  Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading , 1983 .

[10]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[11]  S. Srinivasan Portfolio Trading and Electronic Networks , 1999 .

[12]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[13]  Noam Nisan,et al.  An efficient approximate allocation algorithm for combinatorial auctions , 2001, EC '01.

[14]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[15]  David C. Parkes,et al.  An Iterative Generalized Vickrey Auction: Strategy-Proofness without Complete Revelation , 2001 .

[16]  Vijay Krishna,et al.  Efficient Mechanism Design , 1998 .

[17]  David Levine,et al.  Winner determination in combinatorial auction generalizations , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[18]  David Levine,et al.  CABOB: A Fast Optimal Algorithm for Combinatorial Auctions , 2001, IJCAI.

[19]  Robert H. Wilson Incentive Efficiency of Double Auctions , 1985 .

[20]  A. Gibbard Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result , 1973 .

[21]  M. Jackson,et al.  Strategy-Proof Exchange , 1995 .

[22]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  An algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions , 1999, IJCAI 1999.

[23]  Ho Soo Lee,et al.  Computational Aspects of Clearing Continuous Call Double Auctions with Assignment Constraints and Indivisible Demand , 2001, Electron. Commer. Res..

[24]  Kalyan Chatterjee,et al.  Bargaining under Incomplete Information , 1983, Oper. Res..

[25]  Andrew J. Davenport,et al.  Price Negotiations for Procurement of Direct Inputs , 2002 .

[26]  Steven R. Williams,et al.  Bilateral trade with the sealed bid k-double auction: Existence and efficiency , 1989 .

[27]  Sushil Bikhchandani,et al.  The Package Assignment Model , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[28]  Moshe Babaioff,et al.  Concurrent auctions across the supply chain , 2001, EC '01.

[29]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions , 1998 .

[30]  R. Myerson Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem , 1979 .

[31]  Kiho Yoon,et al.  The Modified Vickrey Double Auction , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[32]  John O. Ledyard,et al.  The Design of Coordination Mechanisms and Organizational Computing , 1993 .

[33]  Daniel Lehmann,et al.  Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities , 2001, EC '01.

[34]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Economic Mechanism Design for Computerized Agents , 1995, USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce.