Organizational Design

Collaborative creativity is traditionally supported by formal techniques, such as brainstorming. These techniques improve the idea-generation process by creating group synergies, but also suffer from a number of negative effects. Current electronic tools to support collaborative creativity overcome some of these problems, but introduce new ones, by either losing the benefits of face-to-face communication or the immediacy of simultaneous contribution. Using an interactive environment as a test bed, we are investigating how collaborative creativity can be supported electronically while maintaining face-to-face communication. What are the design-factors influencing such a system? We have designed a brainstorming application that uses an interactive table and a large wall display, and compared the results of using it to traditional paper-based brainstorming in a user study with 30 participants. From the considerations that went into the design and the observations during the study we derive a number of design guidelines for collaborative systems in interactive environments.

[1]  B. Hennessey.  The Social Psychology of Creativity , 2003, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[2]  Norbert A. Streitz,et al.  i-LAND: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation , 1999, CHI '99.

[3]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces , 2004, CSCW.

[4]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[5]  Lars Erik Holmquist,et al.  Like Solving a Giant Puzzle: Supporting Collaborative Scheduling at a Film Festival , 2003, INTERACT.

[6]  Christian Heide Damm,et al.  Tool support for cooperative object-oriented design: gesture based modelling on an electronic whiteboard , 2000, CHI.

[7]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organization planning , 1986, CSCW '86.

[8]  L. Barsalou.  Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[10]  Andreas Butz,et al.  The EnLighTable: Design of Affordances to Support Collaborative Creativity , 2006, Smart Graphics.

[11]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Symmetry of igorance, social creativity, and meta-design , 1999, Creativity & Cognition.

[12]  Dimitre Novatchev,et al.  Chunking and Phrasing and the Design of Human-Computer Dialogues - Response , 1986, IFIP Congress.

[13]  Horst Geschka,et al.  Introduction and Use of Idea-Generating Methods , 1978 .

[14]  S. M. Hansen.  Where the action is. , 1985, Journal (National Association for Hospital Development (U.S.)).

[15]  Paul Scott,et al.  User interface requirements for face to face groupware , 1990, CHI '90.

[16]  N. Kerr,et al.  Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects , 1983 .

[17]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  A cognitive network model of creativity: a renewed focus on brainstorming methodology , 1999, ICIS.

[18]  Mark W. Newman,et al.  The designers' outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site , 2001, UIST '01.

[19]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Designers' use of paper and the implications for informal tools , 2005, OZCHI.

[20]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Manual and cognitive benefits of two-handed input: an experimental study , 1998, TCHI.

[21]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr-Brown experience , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[22]  A. Osborn.  Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[23]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[24]  David Kirsh,et al.  The Intelligent Use of Space , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[25]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Design for Conversation: Lessons from Cognoter , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[26]  Sunny Consolvo,et al.  User Study Techniques in the Design and Evaluation of a Ubicomp Environment , 2002, UbiComp.

[27]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  The large-display user experience , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[28]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[29]  Terry Winograd,et al.  FlowMenu: combining command, text, and data entry , 2000, UIST '00.

[30]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Large display research overview , 2006, Color Imaging Conference.

[31]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Beta Versus VHS and the Acceptance of Electronic Brainstorming Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[33]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  System Guidelines for Co-located, Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display , 2003, ECSCW.

[34]  L. Gitelman.  The Social Life of Paper , 2009 .

[35]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall-size displays , 2001, UIST '01.

[37]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[38]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modeling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration , 2003, TCHI.

[39]  Christine Reid,et al.  The Myth of the Paperless Office , 2003, J. Documentation.

[40]  Remko van der Lugt.  Functions of sketching in design idea generation meetings , 2002, Creativity & Cognition.

[41]  John C. Tang.  Findings from Observational Studies of Collaborative Work , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[42]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  Techniques of structured problem solving , 1981 .