Comparison of Direct and Indirect Energy Consumption in China and the United States

Greenhouse gas reduction and energy consumption are becoming two important issues in both industrialized and developing countries, and policy makers are developing means to reduce total domestic energy use. We evaluate and compare the direct and the indirect energy consumption both in the People’s Republic of China (China) and the United States of America (US) by looking at a series of hybrid energy input-output tables (1997, 2002, and 2007). We also apply structural decomposition analysis (SDA), to identify the factors causing energy intensity (energy consumption per unit of gross domestic product) to differ between the two countries, which lead to potential energy saving options. Our results show that, besides the differences in direct energy consumption, huge differences also exist in indirect energy consumption between the two countries. Differences in indirect energy consumption are mainly due to differences in technology. Technological change and industrial-structure change are key factors to explain the inequality of energy intensity, while there is a significant trend towards the convergence of sectorial energy efficiency between the two countries.

[1]  W. Leontief.  Input-output economics , 1967 .

[2]  Rutger Hoekstra,et al.  Structural Decomposition Analysis of Physical Flows in the Economy , 2002 .

[3]  中華人民共和国国家統計局.  China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[4]  Y. Xi,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of household indirect energy consumption and impacts of alternative energy policies in China by input-output analysis , 2009 .

[5]  中华人民共和国国家统计局国民经济平衡统计司,et al.  中国投入产出表 = Input-output table of China , 1991 .

[6]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  CO2 Multipliers in Multi-region Input-Output Models , 2004 .

[7]  John Holmberg,et al.  Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: An input-output analysis , 2007 .

[8]  Tim Jackson,et al.  The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input–output model , 2009 .

[9]  M. Lenzen.  Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input–output analysis , 1998 .

[10]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Structural path decomposition , 2009 .

[11]  Todd Levin,et al.  State-scale evaluation of renewable electricity policy: The role of renewable electricity credits and carbon taxes , 2011 .

[12]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: Energy intensity versus product mix , 2007 .

[13]  Bart Los,et al.  Structural decomposition techniques : sense and sensitivity , 1998 .

[14]  Xiannuan Lin,et al.  Input–Output Anatomy of China's Energy Use Changes in the 1980s , 1995 .

[15]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Multi-regional input-output model for regional energy requirements and CO2 emissions in China , 2007 .

[16]  Edward Tower,et al.  The Economic Impact - Industrial and Regional - of an Arms Cut , 1965 .

[17]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Using Input‐Output Analysis to Measure the Environmental Pressure of Consumption at Different Spatial Levels , 2005 .

[18]  John L. R. Proops,et al.  Carbondioxide production by the UK economy: An input-output assessment , 1993 .