Need-Solution Pair Recognition Driven by Object Oriented Solution-Finding

It is generally assumed that in order to find a solution, one must begin the process by first identifying a problem, followed by attempts to solve it. This notion, however, was challenged by von Hippel and von Krogh (2016); rather than starting the process with problem formulation, people may also find solutions by having insights regarding both a previously unidentified need and a responsive solution - a “need-solution pair.” In this paper, we provide empirical evidence for need-solution pair recognition, and also identify the cognitive mechanisms that may underlie this form of solution-finding. We posit that need-solution pairs emerge from a robust recognition system that relies on action-oriented, function-based reasoning about objects. To test this hypothesis, we conducted an experiment in which we manipulated functional object reasoning by (1) adjusting object familiarity and (2) adjusting the level of instructions to actively solve problems. In the context of our experiment, solutions by need-solution pair recognition occurred just as often as need-first solutions, with need-solution pair recognition being best supported when constraints on functional object understanding were reduced. Specifically, identification of need-solution pairs was enhanced most in environments with unfamiliar objects, where participants were not directed to solve specific problems. These results are consistent with research in cognitive neuroscience that explicates the importance of functional understanding of objects in recognition. We extend this research by showing that functional object understanding can result in solution-finding under the right circumstances. We conclude with a discussion of implications of our findings for further research and improved practice.

[1]  H. Lissauer,et al.  A case of visual agnosia with a contribution to theory , 1988 .

[2]  Israel M. Kirzner,et al.  Perception, opportunity, and profit : studies in the theory of entrepreneurship , 1981 .

[3]  Yi-Yuan Tang,et al.  Attention training and attention state training , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Antonio R. Damasio,et al.  The Brain Binds Entities and Events by Multiregional Activation from Convergence Zones , 1989, Neural Computation.

[5]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[6]  S. Ohlsson,et al.  Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving , 1999 .

[7]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  The Micro-Category account of analogy , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[10]  Marco Ragni,et al.  Complex problem solving: another test case? , 2009, Cognitive Processing.

[11]  R. Adamson Functional fixedness as related to problem solving; a repetition of three experiments. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  Dwayne Spradlin,et al.  Are you solving the right problem? , 2016, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[13]  H. Birch,et al.  The negative effect of previous experience on productive thinking. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Edward De Bono,et al.  De Bono's Thinking Course , 1982 .

[15]  A. Chemero Radical Embodied Cognitive Science , 2009 .

[16]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[17]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies , 2014 .

[18]  S. Lahlou,et al.  Subjective Evidence Based Ethnography: Method and Applications , 2015, Integrative psychological & behavioral science.

[19]  Sigal G. Barsade The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and its Influence on Group Behavior , 2002 .

[20]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[21]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. W. Getzels Problem‐Finding and the Inventiveness of Solutions , 1975 .

[24]  三嶋 博之 The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[25]  Creativity and / or Alertness : A Reconsideration of the Schumpeterian , 1999 .

[26]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  On serendipity and organizing , 2010 .

[27]  J. Waller,et al.  Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind , 2009 .

[28]  John F. Kihlstrom,et al.  Intuition, incubation, and insight: Implicit cognition in problem solving. , 1996 .

[29]  Ohid Yaqub,et al.  Serendipity: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory , 2016 .

[30]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation policy: What, why, and how , 2017 .

[31]  V. Glăveanu,et al.  Through the Creator's Eyes: Using the Subjective Camera to Study Craft Creativity , 2012 .

[32]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mathematical problem solving by analogy. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  S. Anderson,et al.  Attentional processes link perception and action , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Alexandre Bernardino,et al.  Learning intermediate object affordances: Towards the development of a tool concept , 2014, 4th International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics.

[35]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Impacts of Personality Traits on Consumer Innovation Success , 2014 .

[36]  Israel M. Kirzner Creativity and/or Alertness: A Reconsideration of the Schumpeterian Entrepreneur , 1999 .

[37]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptions of perceptual symbols , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  H. Pashler,et al.  Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[39]  J. Norman Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[40]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[41]  Thomas A. Ban,et al.  The role of serendipity in drug discovery , 2006, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[42]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[43]  Sylvia Weir,et al.  Action perception , 1974 .

[44]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[45]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[46]  K. Dunbar,et al.  The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: the case of analogy , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Serendipity and information seeking: an empirical study , 2003, J. Documentation.

[48]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  R. Baer Assessment of mindfulness by self-report. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[50]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  T. J. Allen,et al.  Positive and Negative Biasing Sets: The Effects of Prior Experience on Research Performance , 2015 .

[52]  N. Maier Reasoning in humans. I. On direction. , 1930 .

[53]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Component Processes in Analogical Reasoning. , 1977 .

[54]  Jill E. Perry-Smith,et al.  A Social Composition View of Team Creativity: The Role of Member Nationality-Heterogeneous Ties Outside of the Team , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[55]  Marina Basu The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience , 2004 .

[56]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  Sergio E Chaigneau,et al.  Situational information contributes to object categorization and inference. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[58]  Simon Joss,et al.  Sustainable–Smart–Resilient–Low Carbon–Eco–Knowledge Cities; Making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization , 2015 .

[59]  Manuel Lopes,et al.  Affordance-based imitation learning in robots , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[60]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[61]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[62]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. , 2006, Psychological assessment.

[63]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Of cabbages and things: Semantic memory from a neuropsychological perspective—A tutorial review. , 1994 .

[64]  A. Luchins Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[65]  A. Milner,et al.  How do the two visual streams interact with each other? , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[66]  Brian F. Bowdle,et al.  The career of metaphor. , 2005, Psychological review.

[67]  Sergio E. Chaigneau,et al.  THE SIMILARITY-IN-TOPOGRAPHY PRINCIPLE: RECONCILING THEORIES OF CONCEPTUAL DEFICITS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[68]  Russell W. Belk,et al.  Videography in marketing and consumer research , 2005 .

[69]  E. Hippel,et al.  Identifying Viable ‘Need-Solution Pairs’: Problem Solving Without Problem Formulation , 2013 .

[70]  T. McCaffrey Innovation Relies on the Obscure , 2012, Psychological science.

[71]  B. Hommel,et al.  Meditate to Create: The Impact of Focused-Attention and Open-Monitoring Training on Convergent and Divergent Thinking , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[72]  Orit Hazzan,et al.  Problem-solving strategies , 1986 .

[73]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[74]  H. Walpole The Theory of Definition and its Application to Vocabulary Limitation , 1937 .

[75]  Garry Young,et al.  Are different affordances subserved by different neural pathways? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[76]  E. Chrysikou When shoes become hammers: Goal-derived categorization training enhances problem-solving performance. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[77]  E. Reed The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[78]  Alice J. Corkill,et al.  Individual Differences in Transfer via Analogy. , 1995 .

[79]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Ethnographies in the Front End: Designing for Enhanced Customer Experiences* , 2006 .

[80]  Alexandre Bernardino,et al.  Learning visual affordances of objects and tools through autonomous robot exploration , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC).

[81]  M. Goodale How (and why) the visual control of action differs from visual perception , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[82]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[83]  Britta K. Hölzel,et al.  The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[84]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making , 2000 .