Relationships between Online Motivation, Participation, and Achievement: More Complex than You Might Think.

With the increasing importance and rapid growth of online courses, diversification of the student population, and the growing concern over retention rates, exploration of learner online participation and possible relationships with motivation and achievement behaviour is becoming increasingly relevant in higher education. Previous studies (Gerber, Grundt, and Grote, 2008; Picciano, 2002) have tended to explore links between learner activity and performance in online environments. But the relationships that may exist between motivation and participation (both in terms of quality and quantity of activity) in online contexts are not well understood. Indeed, participation, particularly active participation such as posting messages to online discussions, is frequently used as a proxy for motivation, with more active learners being perceived as more motivated. This paper presents findings of one aspect of a larger study (Hartnett, 2010) that explored the motivation of pre-service teachers situated within two separate and distinct online distance learning contexts. Self-report motivation data, achievement, and online usage statistical data, in conjunction with asynchronous discussion-forum transcripts, were used to explore possible relationships between motivation, participation, and achievement in these contexts. Analysis revealed important differences between and within the two cases (e.g., nature of the task and assessment approaches) that indicated situational factors played a key role in determining whether any significant relationships were present. In other words, various factors within the specific learning environment combined in complex ways to influence motivation to learn and the nature of student participation. In an age of increasing exploration and interpretation of online learner behaviour via automatically collected systems statistics (Beer, Jones, and Clark, 2009), these findings highlight the need to be cautious about using online activity as the only gauge for assessing student motivation in online contexts.

[1]  Martin A. Andresen.  Asynchronous Discussion Forums: Success Factors, Outcomes, Assessments, and Limitations , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  John M. Keller,et al.  First principles of motivation to learn and e3‐learning , 2008 .

[3]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Why Students Contribute in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2008 .

[4]  Teklu Abate Bekele,et al.  Motivation and Satisfaction in Internet-Supported Learning Environments: A Review , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[5]  A. P. Rovai.  Building classroom community at a distance: A case study , 2001 .

[6]  Mervyn J. Wighting,et al.  Distinguishing Sense of Community and Motivation Characteristics between Online and Traditional College Students. , 2008 .

[7]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[8]  Lih-Juan ChanLin,et al.  Applying motivational analysis in a Web‐based course , 2009 .

[9]  Theo J. Bastiaens,et al.  The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[11]  Martha Cleveland-Innes,et al.  Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[12]  Z. Berge,et al.  Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study , 2005 .

[13]  Margaret Hartnett,et al.  Motivation to learn in online environments : an exploration of two tertiary education contexts : a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Education at Massey University, Manawatu, New Zealand , 2010 .

[14]  Leah P. Macfadyen,et al.  Learning or performance: Predicting drivers of student motivation , 2009 .

[15]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[16]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research , 2006 .

[17]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[18]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Going the Distance With Online Education , 2006 .

[19]  E. Deci,et al.  Handbook of Self-Determination Research , 2002 .

[20]  A. P. Rovai.  In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs , 2003, Internet High. Educ..

[21]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[22]  Colin Sharp.  Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[23]  Colin Beer,et al.  The indicators project identifying effective learning: Adoption, activity, grades and external factors , 2009 .

[24]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations in the Classroom: Age Differences and Academic Correlates , 2005 .

[25]  Philip Barker,et al.  Using e-learning dialogues in higher education , 2004 .

[26]  P. Abrami,et al.  Motivation to Learn via Computer Conferencing: Exploring How Task-Specific Motivation and CC Expectations are Related to Student Acceptance of Learning via CC , 2002 .

[27]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  On-Line Course Effectiveness: An Analysis of Student Interactions and Perceptions of Learning , 2007 .

[28]  R. Vallerand,et al.  On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) , 2000 .

[29]  Pei Wang,et al.  What Do You Mean by "AI"? , 2008, AGI.

[30]  Maggie Hartnett,et al.  Examining motivation in online distance learning environments: Complex, multifaceted and situation-dependent , 2011 .

[31]  Mike Moore,et al.  Distance Education: A Systems View , 1995 .

[32]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice , 2006 .

[33]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Extending the Traditional Classroom Through Online Discussion: The Role of Student Motivation , 2006 .

[34]  R. Vallerand,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. , 2002 .

[35]  Dorothy H. Evensen,et al.  Factors Affecting Small-Group Tutorial Learning: A Review of Research , 2000 .

[36]  D. Schunk.  Self-Efficacy and Education and Instruction , 1995 .

[37]  J. Brophy.  Motivating Students To Learn , 1987 .

[38]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  Technology, e-Learning and Distance Education (2nd edition) , 2006 .

[39]  Anthony R. Artino,et al.  Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: predicting satisfaction with online training , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[40]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Facilitating online discussions effectively , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[41]  Ann C. Jones,et al.  Learning Technologies: Affective and Social Issues , 2007 .

[42]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[43]  W. Schumm,et al.  Audiences and providers of distance education , 2009 .

[44]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Distributed collaboration activities in a blended learning scenario and the effects on learning performance , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[45]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[46]  Bill Anderson,et al.  Writing power into online discussion , 2006 .

[47]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Towards a Theory of Online Learning , 2004 .

[48]  J. E. Maddux.  Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. , 1995 .

[49]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Assessing Individual-Level Factors Supporting Student Intrinsic Motivation in Online Discussions: A Qualitative Study , 2008, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..