The distribution of acetylcholine sensitivity at the post‐synaptic membrane of vertebrate skeletal twitch muscles: iontophoretic mapping in the micron range.

1. The distribution of acetylcholine (ACh) sensitivity was mapped in skeletal twitch muscles of the snake, frog and mudpuppy with iontophoretic methods that provide a resolution in the mum range. 2. The preparations were thin sheets of muscle fibres that were viewed with Nomarski optics, giving sharp definition of cellular detail. The muscles in the snake were especially suitable. Their motor nerves terminate in a compact cluster of synaptic boutons that rest in distinct craters on the muscle surface. After treatment with collagenase the motor nerve and its terminal boutons can be removed, exposing the subsynaptic membrane in the craters. 3. The slopes of dose‐response curves obtained by iontophoretic application of ACh were expressed in mV/nC and used as an index of ACh sensitivity. The areas of highest sensitivity, tested either with the terminals in place or removed, were those immediately under the presynaptic terminals. The greatest subsynaptic sensitivities were about 5000 mV/nC, and the time course of the potentials caused by ACh released iontophoretically closely matched that of synaptic potentials set up by ACh released by the nerve. 4. The sensitivity of the extrasynaptic surface less than 2 mum away was at least 50 times lower than that of the subsynaptic membrane. The low extrasynaptic sensitivity declined still further at greater distances. 5. Acetylcholinesterase was shown physiologically to be confined to subsynaptic areas. No activity of the enzyme was detected in extrasynaptic areas beyond about 2 mum from the edge of the synapse. 6. The confinement of high densities of receptors and of acetylcholinesterase to the subsynaptic membrane in muscles is also a feature in parasympathetic neurones. It is suggested that similar specialization may be a widespread property of neurones with chemical synapses.

[1]  R. Miledi The acetylcholine sensitivity of frog muscle fibres after complete or partial denervation , 1960, The Journal of Physiology.

[2]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Effects of proteolytic enzymes on function and structure of frog neuromuscular junctions , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  A. J. Harris,et al.  The development of chemosensitivity in extrasynaptic areas of the neuronal surface after denervation of parasympathetic ganglion cells in the heart of the frog , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  A. Cangiano Acetylcholine supersensitivity: the role of neurotrophic factors. , 1973, Brain research.

[5]  R. Ridge Different types of extrafusal muscle fibres in snake costocutaneous muscles , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  B. Katz,et al.  Visual identification of synaptic boutons on living ganglion cells and of varicosities in postganglionic axons in the heart of the frog , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[7]  A. R. Martin,et al.  A further study of the statistical composition of the end‐plate potential , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  D. Drachman,et al.  Trophic Regulation of Acetylcholine Sensitivity of Muscle: Effect of Electrical Stimulation , 1972, Science.

[9]  C. Hunt,et al.  The relation of membrane changes to contraction in twitch muscle fibres , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  T. Reese,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR RECYCLING OF SYNAPTIC VESICLE MEMBRANE DURING TRANSMITTER RELEASE AT THE FROG NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION , 1973, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  J. N. Langley On the contraction of muscle, chiefly in relation to the presence of ‘receptive’ substances , 1909, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  E. Albuquerque,et al.  Effects of vinblastine and colchicine on neural regulation of the fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[13]  R. Miledi Junctional and extra‐junctional acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle fibres , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  B. Sakmann,et al.  The effect of contractile activity on fibrillation and extrajunctional acetylcholine‐sensitivity in rat muscle maintained in organ culture , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  S. Thesleff,et al.  A study of supersensitivity in denervated mammalian skeletal muscle , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  J. Simpson THE RELEASE OF NEURAL TRANSMITTER SUBSTANCES , 1969 .

[17]  B. Katz,et al.  On the localization of acetylcholine receptors , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  G. Vrbóva,et al.  Two factors responsible for the development of denervation hypersensitivity , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  S. W. Kuffler SPECIFIC EXCITABILITY OF THE ENDPLATE REGION IN NORMAL AND DENERVATED MUSCLE , 1943 .

[20]  B. Katz,et al.  A study of the ‘desensitization’ produced by acetylcholine at the motor end‐plate , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  B Katz,et al.  The statistical nature of the acetylcholine potential and its molecular components , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  A. Mallart,et al.  Ionic permeability changes induced by some cholinergic agonists on normal and denervated frog muscles , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  A. Mauro,et al.  TURNOVER OF TRANSMITTER AND SYNAPTIC VESICLES AT THE FROG NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION , 1973, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  B. Katz,et al.  The interaction between edrophonium (tensilon) and acetylcholine at the motor end-plate. , 1957, British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy.

[25]  T. Lømo,et al.  Control of ACh sensitivity by muscle activity in the rat , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  R. Couteaux The differentiation of synaptic areas , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[27]  R. Kelly,et al.  Enzymatic detachment of endplate acetylcholinesterase from muscle. , 1971, Nature: New biology.

[28]  N. Kulchitsky Nerve Endings in Muscles. , 1924, Journal of anatomy.

[29]  A. J. Harris,et al.  Differential chemosensitivity of synaptic and extrasynaptic areas on the neuronal surface membrane in parasympathetic neurons of the frog, tested by microapplication of acetylcholine , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[30]  A. Hess THE SARCOPLASMIC RETICULUM, THE T SYSTEM, AND THE MOTOR TERMINALS OF SLOW AND TWITCH MUSCLE FIBERS IN THE GARTER SNAKE , 1965, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  B. Katz,et al.  On the factors which determine the amplitude of the ‘miniature end‐plate potential’ , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  M. Anderson,et al.  Fluorescent staining of acetylcholine receptors in vertebrate skeletal muscle , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  U. J. McMahan,et al.  Distribution of acetylcholine receptors in the vicinity of nerve terminals on skeletal muscle of the frog , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[34]  N. Spitzer,et al.  Visual identification of nerve terminals in living isolated skeletal muscle , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[35]  J. T. Alexander,et al.  The action of 3-hydroxyphenyldimethylethyl-ammonium (tensilon) on neuromuscular transmission in the frog. , 1954, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[36]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  Synaptic transmission and its duplication by focally applied acetylcholine in parasympathetic neurons in the heart of the frog , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[37]  A. Trautmann,et al.  Ionic properties of the neuromuscular junction of the frog: effects of denervation and pH , 1973, Journal of Physiology.

[38]  G B KOELLE,et al.  A Histochemical Method for Localizing Cholinesterase Activity.* , 1949, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[39]  E. Barnard,et al.  Cholinergic Receptor Molecules and Cholinesterase Molecules at Mouse Skeletal Muscle Junctions , 1971, Nature.

[40]  B. Katz,et al.  The fine structure of the neuromuscular junction of the frog , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  C C Hunt,et al.  Responses of snake muscle spindles to stretch and intrafusal muscle fiber contraction. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  B. Katz,et al.  Further observations on the distribution of acetylcholine‐reactive sites in skeletal muscle , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  B. Katz,et al.  Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  B. Katz,et al.  Quantal components of the end‐plate potential , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[45]  H. C. Hartzell,et al.  Acetylcholine Receptors: Number and Distribution at Neuromuscular Junctions in Rat Diaphragm , 1972, Science.

[46]  A. Takeuchi,et al.  Localized action of gamma‐aminobutyric acid on the crayfish muscle , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[47]  K. Lucas The excitable substances of amphibian muscle , 1907, The Journal of physiology.

[48]  F. Vyskocil,et al.  The action of tubocurarine and atropine on the normal and denervated rat diaphragm , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[49]  R. Miledi,et al.  Acetylcholine in Mammalian Neuromuscular Transmission , 1958, Nature.