Meiotic Interactors of a Mitotic Gene TAO3 Revealed by Functional Analysis of its Rare Variant

Studying the molecular consequences of rare genetic variants has the potential to identify novel and hitherto uncharacterized pathways causally contributing to phenotypic variation. Here, we characterize the functional consequences of a rare coding variant of TAO3, previously reported to contribute significantly to sporulation efficiency variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. During mitosis, the common TAO3 allele interacts with CBK1—a conserved NDR kinase. Both TAO3 and CBK1 are components of the RAM signaling network that regulates cell separation and polarization during mitosis. We demonstrate that the role of the rare allele TAO3(4477C) in meiosis is distinct from its role in mitosis by being independent of ACE2—a RAM network target gene. By quantitatively measuring cell morphological dynamics, and expressing the TAO3(4477C) allele conditionally during sporulation, we show that TAO3 has an early role in meiosis. This early role of TAO3 coincides with entry of cells into meiotic division. Time-resolved transcriptome analyses during early sporulation identified regulators of carbon and lipid metabolic pathways as candidate mediators. We show experimentally that, during sporulation, the TAO3(4477C) allele interacts genetically with ERT1 and PIP2, regulators of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and gluconeogenesis metabolic pathways, respectively. We thus uncover a meiotic functional role for TAO3, and identify ERT1 and PIP2 as novel regulators of sporulation efficiency. Our results demonstrate that studying the causal effects of genetic variation on the underlying molecular network has the potential to provide a more extensive understanding of the pathways driving a complex trait.

[1]  D. Stillman,et al.  ACE2, CBK1, and BUD4 in Budding and Cell Separation , 2005, Eukaryotic Cell.

[2]  J. Hiltunen,et al.  Avoiding unscheduled transcription in shared promoters: Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sum1p represses the divergent gene pair SPS18-SPS19 through a midsporulation element (MSE) , 2009, FEMS yeast research.

[3]  G. Bhanot,et al.  Sporulation Genes Associated with Sporulation Efficiency in Natural Isolates of Yeast , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  Riccardo Bellazzi,et al.  TimeClust: a clustering tool for gene expression time series , 2008, Bioinform..

[5]  J. Mccusker,et al.  Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Yeast.

[6]  G. Bellí,et al.  An activator/repressor dual system allows tight tetracycline-regulated gene expression in budding yeast. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Himanshu Sinha,et al.  Temporal Expression Profiling Identifies Pathways Mediating Effect of Causal Variant on Phenotype , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[8]  B. Cohen,et al.  Causal Variation in Yeast Sporulation Tends to Reside in a Pathway Bottleneck , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[9]  Audrey P Gasch,et al.  The Power of Natural Variation for Model Organism Biology. , 2016, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[10]  M. Piskacek,et al.  Functional analysis of the Zn(2)Cys(6) transcription factors Oaf1p and Pip2p. Different roles in fatty acid induction of beta-oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1999, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  Galit Shenhar,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of meiosis in budding yeast. , 2003, International review of cytology.

[12]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast , 2009, Nature.

[13]  G. Marzluf,et al.  Genetic regulation of nitrogen metabolism in the fungi , 1997, Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR.

[14]  B. Daignan-Fornier,et al.  Regulation of Amino Acid, Nucleotide, and Phosphate Metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2012, Genetics.

[15]  S. Gabriel,et al.  De novo somatic mutations in components of the PI3K-AKT3-mTOR pathway cause hemimegalencephaly , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Ronald W Davis,et al.  Parallel phenotypic analysis of sporulation and postgermination growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  E. Génin,et al.  How important are rare variants in common disease? , 2014, Briefings in functional genomics.

[18]  F. Robert,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of nonfermentable carbon utilization in budding yeast. , 2010, FEMS yeast research.

[19]  A. Neiman,et al.  A Highly Redundant Gene Network Controls Assembly of the Outer Spore Wall in S. cerevisiae , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[20]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Quantitative trait loci mapped to single-nucleotide resolution in yeast , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[21]  A. Neiman,et al.  Sporulation in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2011, Genetics.

[22]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  The core meiotic transcriptome in budding yeasts , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[23]  P. Stankiewicz,et al.  Structural variation in the human genome and its role in disease. , 2010, Annual review of medicine.

[24]  Catarina Costa,et al.  The YEASTRACT database: an upgraded information system for the analysis of gene and genomic transcription regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  Paul M. Magwene,et al.  Pleiotropic signaling pathways orchestrate yeast development. , 2011, Current opinion in microbiology.

[26]  Timothy R Hughes,et al.  RAM: a conserved signaling network that regulates Ace2p transcriptional activity and polarized morphogenesis. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression , 2002, ISMB.

[28]  I. Dunham,et al.  Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR. , 1990, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  M. J. Law,et al.  Global alterations of the transcriptional landscape during yeast growth and development in the absence of Ume6-dependent chromatin modification , 2015, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[30]  P. Novick,et al.  Pag1p, a novel protein associated with protein kinase Cbk1p, is required for cell morphogenesis and proliferation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[31]  Steven Hahn,et al.  Transcriptional regulation Meeting on Regulatory Mechanisms in Eukaryotic Transcription , 2008 .

[32]  Alexander Pertsemlidis,et al.  Low LDL cholesterol in individuals of African descent resulting from frequent nonsense mutations in PCSK9 , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[33]  Robert P. Davey,et al.  Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts , 2008, Nature.

[34]  R. D. Gietz,et al.  Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[35]  Julien Gagneur,et al.  Genotype-Environment Interactions Reveal Causal Pathways That Mediate Genetic Effects on Phenotype , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[36]  John D. Storey,et al.  Significance analysis of time course microarray experiments. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  B. Cohen,et al.  Genetic Interactions Between Transcription Factors Cause Natural Variation in Yeast , 2009, Science.

[38]  Igor V. Karpichev,et al.  Global Regulatory Functions of Oaf1p and Pip2p (Oaf2p), Transcription Factors That Regulate Genes Encoding Peroxisomal Proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[39]  A. Amon,et al.  Control of Meiosis by Respiration , 2008, Current Biology.

[40]  A. Neiman,et al.  Ascospore Formation in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[41]  P. Ye,et al.  Characterization of the Metabolic Requirements in Yeast Meiosis , 2013, PloS one.

[42]  M. Daly,et al.  Searching for missing heritability: Designing rare variant association studies , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Michael Ruogu Zhang,et al.  Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[44]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Uncovering the roles of rare variants in common disease through whole-genome sequencing , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[45]  Jonathan C. Cohen,et al.  Multiple Rare Alleles Contribute to Low Plasma Levels of HDL Cholesterol , 2004, Science.

[46]  B. Hemmings,et al.  NDR kinases regulate essential cell processes from yeast to humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[47]  Ben Lehner,et al.  Predicting phenotypic variation from genotypes, phenotypes and a combination of the two. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[48]  Gos Micklem,et al.  YeastMine—an integrated data warehouse for Saccharomyces cerevisiae data as a multipurpose tool-kit , 2012, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[49]  M. Polymenis,et al.  Roles of the RAM signaling network in cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Current Genetics.

[50]  Judy H. Cho,et al.  Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases , 2009, Nature.

[51]  F. Robert,et al.  The Switch from Fermentation to Respiration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Regulated by the Ert1 Transcriptional Activator/Repressor , 2014, Genetics.