Bullet trains and steam engines: exogenous attention zips but endogenous attention chugs along.

Analyzing a scene requires shifting attention from object to object. Although several studies have attempted to determine the speed of these attentional shifts, there are large discrepancies in their estimates. Here, we adapt a method pioneered by T. A. Carlson, H. Hogendoorn, and F. A. J. Verstraten (2006) that directly measures pure attentional shift times. We also test if attentional shifts can be handled in parallel by the independent resources available in the two cortical hemispheres. We present 10 "clocks," with single revolving hands, in a ring around fixation. Observers are asked to report the hand position on one of the clocks at the onset of a transient cue. The delay between the reported time and the veridical time at cue onset can be used to infer processing and attentional shift times. With this setup, we use a novel subtraction method that utilizes different combinations of exogenous and endogenous cues to determine shift times for both types of attention. In one experiment, subjects shift attention to an exogenously cued clock (baseline condition) in one block, and in other blocks, subjects perform one further endogenous shift to a nearby clock (test condition). In another experiment, attention is endogenously cued to one clock (baseline condition), and on other trials, an exogenous cue further shifts attention to a nearby clock (test condition). Subtracting report delays in the baseline condition from those obtained in the test condition allows us to isolate genuine attentional shift times. In agreement with previous studies, our results reveal that endogenous attention is much slower than exogenous attention (endogenous: 250 ms; exogenous: 100 ms). Surprisingly, the dependence of shift time on distance is minimal for exogenous attention, whereas it is steep for endogenous attention. In the final experiment, we find that endogenous shifts are faster across hemifields than within a hemifield suggesting that the two hemispheres can simultaneously process at least parts of these shifts.

[1]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  The capacity of visual short-term memory is set by total information load, not number of objects , 2010 .

[2]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Cortical and callosal connections concerned with the vertical meridian of visual fields in the cat. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[5]  B. P. Choudhury,et al.  THE FUNCTION OF THE CALLOSAL CONNECTIONS OF THE VISUAL CORTEX. , 1965, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[6]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Disengaging attention sets the temporal limit of attentive tracking , 2007, Vision Research.

[8]  R. Remington,et al.  Moving attention: Evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[10]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Attentional pursuit is faster than attentional saccade. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[12]  John M Findlay,et al.  Saccadic eye movement programming: sensory and attentional factors , 2009, Psychological research.

[13]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[14]  H. Bedell,et al.  Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. , 2000, Science.

[15]  A. Dale,et al.  The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  B. Julesz,et al.  Fast noninertial shifts of attention. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[19]  G. Sperling,et al.  Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. , 1995 .

[20]  Jean-François Delvenne,et al.  The capacity of visual short-term memory within and between hemifields , 2005, Cognition.

[21]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[22]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[24]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Functional properties of parietal visual neurons: mechanisms of directionality along a single axis , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  H. Egeth,et al.  Further evidence for a time-independent shift of the focus of attention , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Y. Tsal Movements of attention across the visual field. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  D. Homa,et al.  Reallocation of visual attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  G. Sperling,et al.  Attention gating in short-term visual memory. , 1986, Psychological review.

[29]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Orienting of attention and eye movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  G. Shulman,et al.  Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  P. Tse,et al.  BOLD Signal in Both Ipsilateral and Contralateral Retinotopic Cortex Modulates with Perceptual Fading , 2010, PloS one.

[32]  Marty G. Woldorff,et al.  Mechanisms of Moving the Mind's Eye: Planning and Execution of Spatial Shifts of Attention , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Visual perceptual rate under two conditions of search. , 1969, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[34]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Michael A. Cohen,et al.  The speed of free will , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The speed of visual attention: what time is it? , 2006, Journal of vision.

[37]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Functional properties of parietal visual neurons: radial organization of directionalities within the visual field , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  S. Kastner,et al.  Neurons with large bilateral receptive fields in monkey prelunate gyrus , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[40]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[41]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[42]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time , 1972 .

[44]  Thomas A Carlson,et al.  Timing divided attention. , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.