On single sensor-based inertial navigation

In this paper, we compare two novel algorithms for pedestrian navigation based on signals collected by a single wearable Magnetic, Angular Rate, and Gravity (MARG) sensor. The two navigation algorithms, denoted as Enhanced Pedestrian Dead Reckoning (EPDR) and De-Drifted Propagation (DDP), require the placement of the MARG sensor on the foot or on the chest of the test subject, respectively. Different methods for gait characterization are compared, evaluating navigation dynamics by using data collected through an extensive experimental campaign. The main goal of this research is to investigate the peculiarities of different inertial navigation algorithms, in order to highlight the impact of the sensor's placement, together with inertial sensor issues. Considering a closed path (i.e., ending at the starting point), the relative distance error between the starting point and the final estimated position is about 2% of the total travelled distance for both DDP and EPDR navigation algorithms. On the other hand, the error between the initial heading angle and the final estimated one is approximately 10° for EPDR and 7° for DDP, respectively.

[1]  H. Haas,et al.  Pedestrian Dead Reckoning : A Basis for Personal Positioning , 2006 .

[2]  Min-You Wu,et al.  WiBEST: A hybrid personal indoor positioning system , 2013, 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[3]  Sebastian Madgwick,et al.  Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[4]  Evtim Peytchev,et al.  On the efficacy of WiFi indoor positioning in a practical setting , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC).

[5]  J.W. Kim,et al.  Adaptive Step Length Estimation Algorithm Using Low-Cost MEMS Inertial Sensors , 2007, 2007 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium.

[6]  A. Hof,et al.  Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[7]  Jizhong Xiao,et al.  Keeping a Good Attitude: A Quaternion-Based Orientation Filter for IMUs and MARGs , 2015, Sensors.

[8]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Robust tracking of a mobile beacon using time differences of arrival with simultaneous calibration of receiver positions , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[9]  I-Ming Chen,et al.  3-D Localization of Human Based on an Inertial Capture System , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[10]  F. Seco,et al.  A comparison of Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning algorithms using a low-cost MEMS IMU , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[11]  D. Alvarez,et al.  Comparison of Step Length Estimators from Weareable Accelerometer Devices , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Huai-Rong Shao,et al.  WiFi-based indoor positioning , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  H. Weinberg Using the ADXL202 in Pedometer and Personal Navigation Applications , 2002 .