Role of MRI in Detection of Morton’s Neuroma

Background: Distinguishing between patients with a true Morton’s neuroma and other forefoot pathology can be difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when compared to clinical examination for Morton’s neuroma. Methods: We retrospectively identified 71 patients who underwent operative treatment due to the diagnosis of Morton’s neuroma between 2007 and 2013. All patients had a MRI preoperative. Our study group comprised 58 female and 13 male patients with a mean age of 57 (range, 38-92) years. We compared the results of preoperative MRI and the patient’s clinical assessment with postoperative histopathological results. Results: Typical clinical signs were found in 65 cases. Most common symptoms were plantar pain (92%) and increased pain on walking (89%). A Morton’s neuroma was detected on MRI in 59 of 71 cases. Its sensitivity was 0.84 and its specificity was 0.33. The positive and negative predictive values were 0.97 and 0.08, respectively. For the presence of main clinical symptoms we found a sensitivity of 0.94 and a specificity of 0.33. The positive predictive value was 0.97 and the negative predictive value was 0.20. Conclusion: MRI under routine conditions had a good detection rate for the evaluation of Morton’s neuroma. However, its accuracy was not as high as the accuracy of clinical assessment. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective series.

[1]  Sameer Jain,et al.  The Diagnosis and Management of Morton’s Neuroma , 2013, Foot & ankle specialist.

[2]  M. Fazal,et al.  Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of Morton's neuroma. , 2012, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[3]  L. Puig,et al.  MRI and ultrasonography in Morton's neuroma: Diagnostic accuracy and correlation , 2012, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[4]  C. Charalambides,et al.  Morton's neuroma: A clinical versus radiological diagnosis. , 2012, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[5]  C. Plaass,et al.  Die Mortonsche Neuralgie , 2010 .

[6]  W. Adams Morton's neuroma. , 2010, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery.

[7]  Ho-Taek Song,et al.  Morton Neuroma: Evaluated with Ultrasonography and MR Imaging , 2007, Korean journal of radiology.

[8]  M. Zanetti,et al.  MR imaging of the forefoot: Morton neuroma and differential diagnoses. , 2005, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[9]  S. Shapiro Endoscopic decompression of the intermetatarsal nerve for Morton's neuroma. , 2004, Foot and ankle clinics.

[10]  T. Saxby,et al.  The role of MRI and ultrasound imaging in Morton's neuroma and the effect of size of lesion on symptoms. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  J. Willmann,et al.  Morton neuroma: MR imaging in prone, supine, and upright weight-bearing body positions. , 2003, Radiology.

[12]  Z. Rosenberg,et al.  Morton's neuroma: is it always symptomatic? , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M. Zanetti,et al.  Outcomes After Partial Neurectomy of Morton's Neuroma Related to Preoperative Case Histories, Clinical Findings, and Findings on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans , 1999, Foot & ankle international.

[14]  P. Colletti,et al.  Morton neuroma: evaluation with MR imaging performed with contrast enhancement and fat suppression. , 1993, Radiology.

[15]  J. Hyde,et al.  Interdigital (Morton) neuroma: high-resolution MR imaging with a solenoid coil. , 1991, Radiology.

[16]  U. Lindgren,et al.  Computed tomography for diagnosis of Morton's neuroma. , 1991, The Journal of foot surgery.

[17]  L. Klenerman,et al.  Morton's metatarsalgia. Clinical, electrophysiological and histological observations. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  L. Klenerman,et al.  Free communicationClinical, electrophysiological and histological observations in Morton's neuralgia , 1983 .