Measurement of Serum Anti-staphylococcal Antibodies Increases Positive Predictive Value of Preoperative Aspiration for Hip Prosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND Preoperative synovial fluid culture is pivotal in the early diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) but may yield false-positive and false-negative results. We evaluated the predictive value of synovial fluid culture results combined with the measurement of serum anti-staphylococcal antibodies (SASA). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) For hip and knee PJI, does combining positive SASA results with preoperative synovial culture results improve the positive predictive value (PPV) of preoperative synovial fluid culture alone? (2) Does combining preoperative synovial fluid culture results with a positive cell count and differential result increase the PPV of preoperative synovial fluid culture alone? (3) What proportion of isolated organisms exhibit concordance in antibiotic susceptibility: preoperative aspiration versus intraoperative isolates? METHODS A prospective study was conducted at two French reference centers that manage bone and joint infections and included 481 adult patients who had a revision or resection arthroplasty between June 25, 2012 and June 23, 2014. Exclusion criteria including no serum sample available for immunoassay, the lack of microbiological documentation, and the absence of preoperative aspiration reduced the patient number to 353. Seven patients with an undetermined SASA result were excluded from the analysis. We also excluded patients with PJI involving more than one Staphylococcus species (polystaphylococcal infection) and those in whom more than one Staphylococcus species was recovered from the preoperative synovial fluid culture (polystaphylococcal synovial fluid culture). In total, 340 patients were included in the analysis (no infection, 67% [226 of 340]; staphylococcal infection, 21% [71 of 340]; other infection, 13% [43 of 340]). The preoperative synovial fluid analysis included a cell count and differential and bacterial culture. SASAs were measured using a multiplex immunoassay. The diagnosis of PJI was determined using the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria [14] and intraoperative tissue culture at the time of revision surgery was used as the gold standard (at least one positive intraoperative sample for a "virulent" organism (such as S. aureus) or two positive samples for a "non-virulent" (for example S. epidermidis). RESULTS SASA increased the PPV compared with synovial fluid culture alone (92% [95% CI 82 to 97] versus 79% [95% CI 68 to 87]; p = 0.04); when stratified by site, an increase in PPV was seen in hip infections (100% [95% CI 89 to 100] versus 77% [95% CI 63 to 88]; p = 0.01) but not in knee infections (84% [95% CI 66 to 95] versus 80% [95% CI 64 to 91]; p = 0.75). A positive cell count and differential result increased the PPV of staphylococcal synovial fluid cultures compared with synovial fluid culture alone (86% [95% CI 70 to 95] versus 79% [95% CI 68 to 87]; p = 0.36); when stratified by site, no difference in hip and knee infections was observed (86% [95% CI 67 to 96] versus 77% [95% CI 63 to 88]; p = 0.42) and 86% [95% CI 70 to 95] versus 80% [95% CI 64 to 91]; p = 0.74). CONCLUSION SASA measurement improves the predictive value of synovial fluid cultures of the hip for all staphylococcal organisms, including coagulase-negative staphylococci, but the PPV of SASA plus synovial fluid culture it is not superior to the PPV of synovial fluid cell count/differential plus synovial culture for the knee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, diagnostic study.

[1]  I. Ghout,et al.  Multiplex Antibody Measurement for Post-treatment Follow-up of Staphylococcal Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Diagnostic Pilot Study , 2019, Journal of bone and joint infection.

[2]  P. Pradat,et al.  Microbiologic epidemiology depending on time to occurrence of prosthetic joint infection: a prospective cohort study. , 2019, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[3]  M. Dupon,et al.  Contribution of a multiplex serological test for the preoperative diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a prospective study , 2018, Infectious diseases.

[4]  J. Parvizi,et al.  The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  M. Maltenfort,et al.  Synovial Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  I. Ghout,et al.  Multiplex Antibody Detection for Noninvasive Genus-Level Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection , 2016, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Combined measurement of synovial fluid α-Defensin and C-reactive protein levels: highly accurate for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  Robin Patel,et al.  Prosthetic Joint Infection , 2014, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[9]  X. Qu,et al.  Preoperative Aspiration Culture for Preoperative Diagnosis of Infection in Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty , 2013, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. , 2013, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[11]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection by beadmill processing of a periprosthetic specimen. , 2011, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[12]  Robin Patel,et al.  Laboratory and Clinical Characteristics of Staphylococcus lugdunensis Prosthetic Joint Infections , 2010, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  P. Erwin,et al.  Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  Steven M. Kurtz,et al.  The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  S. Kurtz,et al.  The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  S. Sporer,et al.  Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  R. Barrack,et al.  Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  I. Stockley,et al.  Accuracy of joint aspiration for the preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  Robin Patel,et al.  Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[20]  V. Chicheportiche,et al.  Contribution of routine joint aspiration to the diagnosis of infection before hip revision surgery. , 2003, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[21]  Robin Patel,et al.  Culture with BACTEC Peds Plus/F Bottle Compared with Conventional Methods for Detection of Bacteria in Synovial Fluid , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[22]  T. Fehring,et al.  Aspiration as a guide to sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  P. Norman,et al.  Deep infection of cemented total hip arthroplasties caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.