Effects of age and hearing loss on the recognition of interrupted words in isolation and in sentences.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Note on informational masking. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] M. R. Jones,et al. Dynamic attending and responses to time. , 1989, Psychological review.
[4] Tammo Houtgast,et al. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] P F Seitz,et al. The recognition of isolated words and words in sentences: individual variability in the use of sentence context. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] M. Akeroyd. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[7] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Temporal integration and context effects in hearing , 2003, J. Phonetics.
[8] R Plomp,et al. Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. I: Development of test battery. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] Yoshitaka Nakajima,et al. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound Albert S. Bregman , 1992 .
[10] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] M. Cooke,et al. Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[12] Peter F. Assmann,et al. The Perception of Speech Under Adverse Conditions , 2004 .
[13] Jae Hee Lee,et al. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Lynn Hasher,et al. Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .
[15] Lynn Hasher,et al. Age-related differences in cognition: the role of distraction control. , 2008, Neuropsychology.
[16] L. Humes,et al. Factors influencing recognition of interrupted speech. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] L L Elliott,et al. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] S. Folstein,et al. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.
[19] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[20] W. M. Rabinowitz,et al. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[21] G. L. Powers,et al. Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Kaileen D. Herring,et al. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[23] T. Busey,et al. Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[24] M. Daneman,et al. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] A Boothroyd,et al. Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Philipos C Loizou,et al. Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] T. Salthouse,et al. Information Processing Speed and Aging , 2005 .
[28] J. C. Steinberg,et al. Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .
[29] G. Studebaker,et al. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Hideki Kawahara,et al. Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: Possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds , 1999, Speech Commun..
[31] D D Dirks,et al. Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent words. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Charles S. Watson,et al. Some comments on informational masking , 2005 .
[33] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[34] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[35] Daniel Fogerty,et al. Perceptual contributions of the consonant-vowel boundary to sentence intelligibility. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] L. L. Elliott,et al. Verbal auditory closure and the speech perception in noise (SPIN) Test. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[37] Su-Hyun Jin,et al. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] T. Houtgast,et al. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] Harvey Fletcher,et al. The nature of speech and its interpretation , 1922 .
[40] Larry E. Humes,et al. Factors Affecting Speech Understanding in Older Adults , 2010 .
[41] Roy D Patterson,et al. The mutual roles of temporal glimpsing and vocal characteristics in cocktail-party listening. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. Extended speech intelligibility index for the prediction of the speech reception threshold in fluctuating noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .
[44] C S Watson,et al. Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] Martin Cooke,et al. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] Irwin Pollack,et al. Masking of Speech by Noise at High Sound Levels , 1958 .
[47] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[48] Brian Gygi,et al. Individual differences in auditory abilities. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] Jae Hee Lee,et al. Intelligibility of interrupted sentences at subsegmental levels in young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] Rhodri Cusack,et al. Auditory Perceptual Organization Inside and Outside the Laboratory , 2004 .
[51] A. W. F. Huggins,et al. Temporally segmented speech , 1972 .
[52] Martin Cooke,et al. Glimpsing speech , 2003, J. Phonetics.
[53] Signy Sheldon,et al. Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[54] G. Kidd,et al. Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] R A Lutfi. A model of auditory pattern analysis based on component-relative-entropy. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[56] Jon Barker,et al. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[57] Douglas S Brungart,et al. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.