Mid-career academic women and the prestige economy

ABSTRACT Drawing on 30 semi-structured interviews with women academics based in London higher education institutions in the UK, this paper investigates the gendered nature of the prestige economy in academia. We explore how mid-career academic women strategise their career development and the opportunities and barriers they perceive, particularly in relation to the accrual of academic esteem. Concept maps were used to facilitate dialogue about career plans and provided an artefact from the interviewee’s own perspective. The analysis draws on the concept of prestige, or the indicators of esteem that help advance academic careers, against the backdrop of a higher education context which increasingly relies on quantitative data to make judgements about academic excellence. The interviews indicated that women generally feel that men access status and indicators of esteem more easily than they do. Many women also had ambivalent feelings about gaining recognition through prestige: they understood the importance of status and knew the ‘rules of the game’, but were critical of these rules and sometimes reluctant to overtly pursue prestige. The findings are valuable for understanding how women’s slow access to the highest levels of higher education institutions is shaped by the value that organisations place on individual status.

[1]  K. Crenshaw.  Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color , 1991 .

[2]  Corbin M. Campbell,et al.  Women in Academic Leadership: Professional Strategies, Personal Choices (review) , 2011 .

[3]  Kathleen Lynch.  Carelessness: A hidden doxa of higher education , 2010 .

[4]  Tanya Fitzgerald.  Women Leaders in Higher Education: Shattering the myths , 2013 .

[5]  S. Manfredi,et al.  Women's progression to senior positions in English universities , 2006 .

[6]  Finnborg S. Steinþórsdóttir,et al.  Testing the concept of academic housework in a European setting: Part of academic career-making or gendered barrier to the top? , 2017 .

[7]  Yvonne Benschop,et al.  Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs , 2012 .

[8]  Teresa Carvalho,et al.  Gender, power and managerialism in universities , 2011 .

[9]  M. David.  Research Quality Assessment and the Metrication of the Social Sciences , 2008 .

[10]  K. White,et al.  Senior women in higher education institutions: perceived development needs and support , 2011 .

[11]  L. Morley.  Troubling intra-actions: gender, neo-liberalism and research in the global academy , 2016 .

[12]  S. Ball.  Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An I-Spy Guide to the Neoliberal University , 2012 .

[13]  A. Oakley.  Interviewing Women: an contradiction in terms? , 2013 .

[14]  Anne O'Brien,et al.  Academic leadership: changing conceptions, identities and experiences in UK Higher Education , 2012 .

[15]  Thomas M. Stauffer,et al.  HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY , 1979 .

[16]  Kelly Coate,et al.  Indicators of esteem: gender and prestige in academic work , 2016 .

[17]  S. Haslanger.  Changing the Ideology and Culture of Philosophy: Not by Reason (Alone) , 2008, Hypatia.

[18]  L. Morley.  Lost leaders: women in the global academy , 2014 .

[19]  M. Graham,et al.  Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  The gender mix policy – addressing gender inequality in higher education management , 2011 .

[21]  Lisa Wolf-Wendel,et al.  Academic Motherhood: Managing Complex Roles in Research Universities , 2003 .

[22]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  The metric tide: report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management , 2015 .

[23]  C. Scharff.  Blowing your own Trumpet: Exploring the Gendered Dynamics of Self-Promotion in the Classical Music Profession , 2015 .

[24]  Barbara F. Walter,et al.  The Gender Citation Gap , 2013 .

[25]  Brooks Hanson,et al.  Journals invite too few women to referee , 2017, Nature.

[26]  Carole Leathwood.  Women Academic Researchers: Still Interlopers in the UK Academy? , 2017 .

[27]  Louise Archer,et al.  Younger academics’ constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity , 2008 .

[28]  Ian M. Kinchin,et al.  Developing Discourses of Knowledge and Understanding: Longitudinal Studies of Ph.D. Supervision. , 2013 .

[29]  D. Beach,et al.  The Exploitation of Academic Work: Women in Teaching at Swedish Universities , 2018 .

[30]  Scientific community. U.S. study shows unconscious gender bias in academic science. , 2012, Science.

[31]  L. Archer.  The new neoliberal subjects? Young/er academics’ constructions of professional identity , 2008 .

[32]  D. Beach,et al.  Dividing academic work: gender and academic career at Swedish universities , 2020 .

[33]  J. Preston,et al.  Intersectionality and 'race' in education , 2011 .

[34]  K. White,et al.  Women in Academic Leadership , 2014 .

[35]  Andrea N. Hunt,et al.  What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching , 2015, Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy.

[36]  James Wilsdon.  The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management , 2016 .

[37]  Paul Blackmore,et al.  Motivation in academic life: a prestige economy , 2011 .

[38]  Ian M. Kinchin,et al.  What is a doctorate? A concept-mapped analysis of process versus product in the supervision of lab-based PhDs , 2012 .

[39]  Kathleen Guidroz,et al.  The Intersectional Approach: Transforming the Academy through Race, Class, and Gender , 2010 .