Journal peer review in context: A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing.

[1]  Michèle Lamont,et al.  How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment , 2009 .

[2]  Bjørn Erik Munkvold,et al.  Analyzing Stakeholder Diversity in G2G Efforts: Combining Descriptive Stakeholder Theory and Dialectic Process Theory , 2008 .

[3]  M. Callaham,et al.  Peer Review: Consensus and Contradiction, a Qualitative Approach , 2007 .

[4]  M. Callaham,et al.  A normative model of peer review: qualitative assessment of manuscript reviewers’ attitudes towards peer review , 2007 .

[5]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  Richard Smith,et al.  The Trouble with Medical Journals , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[7]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[8]  John L. Protevi.  The Edinburgh Dictionary of Continental Philosophy , 2005 .

[9]  M. Kearney,et al.  Ethical Issues Faced By Nursing Editors , 2005, Western journal of nursing research.

[10]  Robert L Wears,et al.  The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: a content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers. , 2002, Annals of emergency medicine.

[11]  F. Godlee.  Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit. , 2002, JAMA.

[12]  Alan W Gross,et al.  Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Dwight Atkinson , 2001 .

[13]  E Ernst,et al.  A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy , 2000, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[14]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Peer Review in Health Sciences , 1999 .

[15]  D. Atkinson.  Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society , 1998 .

[16]  J. Morse.  Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods , 1993 .

[17]  S. Richards.  Philosophy and Sociology of Science: An Introduction , 1983 .

[18]  Lull Gf,et al.  THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. , 1947, Science.