Support vector learning approaches for object localization in acoustic wireless sensor networks

Object tracking, whose goal is to estimate the location of a target of interests, is one of the key issues in applications of wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Recently, various target tracking methods were proposed, especially using learning techniques such as neural network and support vector machine (SVM). This paper presents two SVM-based learning approaches for target tracking using WSNs. In the first approach, a black-box relationship between the acoustic measurements and the location of object is learned using least-square support vector regression (LSSVR). The other approach is multi-class classification with cell decomposition, which employ posterior probability regression with Platt's method to learn the sensor model. We describe both approaches and evaluate their performance in terms of the accuracy and robustness. Experimental results show that the direct regression approach is more accurate and robust to the sensing noise than the posterior probability regression approach. The localized aspects of the posterior regression can be advantageous in terms of scalability.

[1]  Kung Yao,et al.  A maximum-likelihood parametric approach to source localizations , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).

[2]  Qing Zhao,et al.  Distributed Learning in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007 .

[3]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Smart kindergarten: sensor-based wireless networks for smart developmental problem-solving environments , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[4]  Gul Agha,et al.  Cooperative tracking with binary-detection sensor networks. , 2003 .

[5]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Distributed Kalman filtering for sensor networks , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  Akbar M. Sayeed,et al.  Detection, Classification and Tracking of Targets in Distributed Sensor Networks , 2002 .

[7]  Bruno Sinopoli,et al.  A kernel-based learning approach to ad hoc sensor network localization , 2005, TOSN.

[8]  John Platt,et al.  Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods , 1999 .

[9]  Hao Zhu,et al.  Self Organization Algorithm for Unattended Acoustic Sensor Networks in Ground Target Tracking , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[10]  G. Sen Gupta,et al.  Wireless Sensors Networks based monitoring: Review, challenges and implementation issues , 2008, 2008 3rd International Conference on Sensing Technology.

[11]  Seddik M. Djouadi,et al.  Position and velocity tracking in mobile cellular networks using the particle filter , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[12]  Leonardo Lizzi,et al.  Object tracking through RSSI measurements in wireless sensor networks , 2008 .

[13]  Slobodan N. Simic,et al.  A Learning-Theory Approach to Sensor Networks , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[14]  Gregory J. Pottie,et al.  Wireless integrated network sensors , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[15]  Gul A. Agha,et al.  Poster abstract: cooperative tracking with binary-detection sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[16]  Sandeep K. S. Gupta,et al.  Research challenges in wireless networks of biomedical sensors , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[17]  Dongbing Gu,et al.  Distributed regression over sensor networks: An support vector machine approach , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Yu Hen Hu,et al.  Detection, classification, and tracking of targets , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..