Smallholder farmers’ knowledge and willingness to pay for insect-based feeds in Kenya

Edible insects are increasingly being considered as sustainable alternatives to fish and soybean meals in animal feed because of their high nutritional quality and environmental benefits. However, successful introduction of a new product to the market depends on the target user’s acceptance. Thus, evaluating the potential demand of insect-based feeds would provide relevant information for policy development. The present study assessed farmers’ knowledge on edible insects as feed, their acceptance of integrating insect meals in animal feeds and willingness to pay (WTP) for insect-based feed (IBF) using a contingent valuation method. A household survey was conducted among 957 randomly selected farmers including: 409 poultry, 241 fish and 307 pig farmers in four counties in Kenya. Results of the study reveal that over 70 and 80% of poultry and fish farmers, respectively, are aware that insects can be used as a feed ingredient. In addition, over 60 and 75% of poultry and fish farmers, respectively, consider insects as a good component of feed. Poultry, pig and fish farmers interviewed accepted and showed willingness to pay for IBF. Regression analysis indicated that age, gender, education, marital status, distance to feed trader, awareness of insects as feed, attitude towards insects, acceptance of insect species, availability of agricultural inputs, use of commercial feeds, availability of training and market information had a significant influence on the WTP for IBF. Therefore, increased extension services to educate famers on the nutritional benefits of insect meals in animal feeds and existing market opportunities are expected to improve farmers’ attitude towards utilization and consequently enhance WTP for IBF, which in return would significantly reduce the existing pressure on conventional fishmeal feed resources. Our findings provide the first insights into the market opportunities of including insect meals in the animal feed value chain in Kenya.

[1]  J. Nicolau,et al.  A reference-dependent approach to WTP for priority , 2019, Tourism Management.

[2]  Riccardo Vecchio,et al.  Willingness to pay for insect-based food: The role of information and carrier , 2019, Food Quality and Preference.

[3]  J. V. van Loon,et al.  Effects of waste stream combinations from brewing industry on performance of Black Soldier Fly, Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) , 2018, PeerJ.

[4]  A. Falk,et al.  Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality , 2018, Science.

[5]  S. B. Olsen,et al.  Innovating out of the fishmeal trap , 2018, British Food Journal.

[6]  E. Norton,et al.  Log Odds and the Interpretation of Logit Models , 2018, Health services research.

[7]  H. Makkar,et al.  Review: Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[8]  Constance Gunhidzirai,et al.  Fish farming as an innovative strategy for promoting food security in drought risk regions of Zimbabwe , 2017, Jamba.

[9]  D. Nakimbugwe,et al.  Use of insects for fish and poultry compound feed in sub-Saharan Africa – a systematic review , 2017 .

[10]  K. K. Jain,et al.  Alternate feeding strategies for optimum nutrient utilization and reducing feed cost for semi-intensive practices in aquaculture system-A review , 2017 .

[11]  M. MacLeod,et al.  Attitudes towards the use of insect-derived materials in Scottish salmon feeds , 2017 .

[12]  M. Mudhara,et al.  Determinant of farmers’ ability to pay for improved irrigation water supply in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa , 2017 .

[13]  Rajee Olaganathan,et al.  Impact of Aquaculture on the Livelihoods and Food Security of Rural Communities , 2017 .

[14]  L. Cunha,et al.  EVALUATION OF INSECT-BASED FOOD ACCEPTANCE BY REPRESENTATIVES OF POLISH CONSUMERS IN THE CONTEXT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PROCESSING RETARDATION , 2017 .

[15]  M. G. Mengistu,et al.  Factors affecting households' decisions in biogas technology adoption, the case of Ofla and Mecha Districts, northern Ethiopia , 2016 .

[16]  C. Proserpio,et al.  New sustainable protein sources: consumers’ willingness to adopt insects as feed and food , 2016 .

[17]  L. Panzone,et al.  When Consumers and Products Come From the Same Place: Preferences and WTP for Geographical Indication Differ Across Regional Identity Groups , 2016 .

[18]  L. Baldi,et al.  An empirical study on consumer acceptance of farmed fish fed on insect meals: the Italian case , 2016, Aquaculture International.

[19]  H. Makkar.  Smart livestock feeding strategies for harvesting triple gain - the desired outcomes in planet, people and profit dimensions: a developing country perspective , 2016 .

[20]  N. Etim,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Organic Fertilizer by Resource Poor Vegetable Farmers in the Humid Tropic , 2016 .

[21]  M. Brugarolas,et al.  Comparing hypothetical versus non-hypothetical methods for measuring willingness to pay in a food context , 2015 .

[22]  U. Hatch,et al.  AQUACULTURE , 2021, The Economics of Fishing.

[23]  S. B. Olsen,et al.  Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for edible insects as food in Kenya: the case of white winged termites , 2015 .

[24]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Insects in animal feed: Acceptance and its determinants among farmers, agriculture sector stakeholders and citizens , 2015 .

[25]  L.P.A. Steenbekkers,et al.  Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance , 2015 .

[26]  G. Chirwa,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF FARMERS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR SUBSIDISED FARM INPUTS IN MALAWI , 2015 .

[27]  G. Piccolo,et al.  Review on the use of insects in the diet of farmed fish: Past and future , 2015 .

[28]  A. Huis,et al.  Insects to feed the world , 2015 .

[29]  D. Gordon,et al.  Vertical and Horizontal Integration in the Uganda Fish Supply Chain: Measuring for Feedback Effects to Fishermen , 2015 .

[30]  H. Makkar,et al.  Towards sustainable animal diets: A survey-based study☆ , 2014 .

[31]  Gilles Tran,et al.  State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. , 2014 .

[32]  N. Angella,et al.  Willingness to pay for irrigation water and its determinants among rice farmers at Doho Rice Irrigation Scheme (DRIS) in Uganda , 2014 .

[33]  J. Ball.  Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security , 2014 .

[34]  J. Nwokocha,et al.  Development of Aquacultural Feeds from locally available Feedstuff: A Giant Step Towards Food Security in Nigeria , 2013 .

[35]  O. Schlüter,et al.  Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. , 2013, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[36]  A. Huis.  Potential of Insects as Food and Feed in Assuring Food Security , 2013 .

[37]  C. Spash,et al.  Is WTP an attitudinal measure? Empirical analysis of the psychological explanation for contingent values , 2011 .

[38]  J. V. van Loon,et al.  An Exploration on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Production by Insect Species Suitable for Animal or Human Consumption , 2010, PloS one.

[39]  P. Thornton.  Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  J. Bridges,et al.  Comparison of four contingent valuation methods to estimate the economic value of a pneumococcal vaccine in Bangladesh , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[41]  E. Chirwa,et al.  Adoption of fertiliser and hybrid seeds by smallholder maize farmers in Southern Malawi , 2005 .

[42]  J. Herriges.  Measuring Goodness of Fit for the Double-Bounded Logit Model: Comment , 1999 .

[43]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[44]  B. Sen.  The State of Food and Agriculture , 1962 .

[45]  Benaissa Chidmi,et al.  CONSUMER DEMAND FOR MEAT IN KENYA: AN EXAMINATION OF THE LINEAR APPROXIMATE ALMOST IDEAL DEMAND SYSTEM , 2017 .

[46]  S. Poret,et al.  What do trout eat: Acceptance of insects in animal feed∗ , 2017 .

[47]  E. Zusman,et al.  Determinants of Willing to Pay (WTP) for Renewable Energy in Post-Fukushima Japan: Results of Ordinal Multinomial Logit and Tobit Regression Models , 2016 .

[48]  B. Okpukpara.  DETERMINANTS OF WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR BIOSECURITY MEASURES AMONG POULTRY FARMERS: A MITIGATION RESPONSE TO BIRD FLU INCIDENCE IN NIGERIA , 2016 .

[49]  W. Verbeke.  Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society , 2015 .

[50]  O. Schlüter,et al.  Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production , 2013 .

[51]  A. van Huis,et al.  Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security , 2013 .

[52]  REPUBLIC OF KENYA MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE , 2012 .

[53]  Metasebia Solomon Mulugeta.  Determinants of Livelihood Strategies of Urban Women: The Case of Female Household Heads in Wolenchiti Town, Ethiopia , 2009 .

[54]  T. Schroeder,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING ADOPTION OF IMPROVED MAIZE SEED AND FERTILISER IN NORTHERN TANZANIA , 1997 .

[55]  Spencer Henson,et al.  CONSUMER WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REDUCTIONS IN THE RISK OF FOOD POISONING IN THE UK , 1996 .

[56]  D. Green,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING FERTILIZER ADOPTION IN LESS DEVELOPED COUNTRIES: AN APPLICATION OF MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC ANALYSIS IN MALAŴI , 1993 .