Bimodality in blood glucose distribution: is it universal?

OBJECTIVE Bimodality in blood glucose (BG) distribution has been demonstrated in several populations with a high prevalence of diabetes and obesity. However, other population studies had not found bimodality, thus casting doubt on its universality. We address this question in four ethnic populations-namely Malay, Chinese, Indian, and the indigenous people of Borneo. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A national health survey was conducted in Malaysia in 1996. A total of 18,397 subjects aged > or =30 years had post-challenge BG measurements taken. To test whether BG was consistent with a bimodal distribution, we fitted unimodal normal and skewed distribution as well a mixture of two normal distributions to the data by age and ethnic groups. RESULTS Age-specific prevalence of diabetes varied from 1.3 to 26.3%. In all ethnic/age groups, the bimodal model fitted the log BG data better (likelihood ratio tests, all P values <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Bimodality in BG distribution is demonstrable even in populations with a very low prevalence of diabetes and obesity. Previous studies that found unimodality had failed to detect the second mode because of inadequate sample size, bias due to treatment of subjects with known diabetes, and inclusion of subjects with type 1 diabetes in the sample. Bimodality implies that diabetes is a distinct entity rather than an arbitrarily defined extreme end of a continuously distributed measurement.

[1]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Bimodality in glucose tolerance distributions in the urban Polynesian population of Western Samoa. , 1984, Diabetes research.

[2]  J. Ekoe Diabetes Mellitus: Aspects of the World-Wide Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Long Term Complications , 1989 .

[3]  S. Haffner,et al.  Evidence of bimodality of two hour plasma glucose concentrations in Mexican Americans: results from the San Antonio Heart study. , 1985, Journal of chronic diseases.

[4]  A. Motala,et al.  South African Indians Show a High Prevalence of NIDDM and Bimodality in Plasma Glucose Distribution Patterns , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[5]  J. Heckman The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models , 1976 .

[6]  M. Rewers,et al.  Global Estimates for Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Adults , 1993, Diabetes Care.

[7]  R. Little Missing-Data Adjustments in Large Surveys , 1988 .

[8]  P. Bennett,et al.  Diabetes in the Pima Indians: Evidence of Bimodality in Glucose Tolerance Distributions , 1971, Diabetes.

[9]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes — An epidemiological overview , 1982, Diabetologia.

[10]  K. Alberti,et al.  Frontiers of diabetes research : current trends in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus : proceedings of the Symposium on NIDDM : Research and Clinical Frontiers in Diabetes, New York, 4-7 May 1989 , 1989 .

[11]  E. Murphy,et al.  One cause? Many causes? , 1964 .

[12]  N E Morton,et al.  Skewness in commingled distributions. , 1976, Biometrics.

[13]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Extraordinary prevalence of non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus and bimodal plasma glucose distribution in the Wanigela people of Papua New Guinea , 1994, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  N. Mendell,et al.  Simulated percentage points for the null distribution of the likelihood ratio test for a mixture of two normals. , 1988, Biometrics.

[15]  P. Zimmet,et al.  Bimodality analysis of frequency distributions of 2-hour plasma glucose concentrations in the urban Micronesian population of Kiribati. , 1993, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[16]  E. Murphy,et al.  ONE CAUSE?MANY CAUSES?THE ARGUMENT FROM THE BIMODAL DISTRIBUTION. , 1964, Journal of chronic diseases.

[17]  P. Zimmet Bimodality of Fasting and Two-hour Glucose Tolerance Distributions in a Micronesian Population , 1978, Diabetes.

[18]  S. Haffner,et al.  A new concept of impaired glucose tolerance. Relation to cardiovascular risk. , 1985, Arteriosclerosis.

[19]  R M Groves,et al.  Advances in strategies for minimizing and adjusting for survey nonresponse. , 1995, Epidemiologic reviews.

[20]  M. Stern Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Interface Between Clinical and Epidemiological Investigation , 1988, Diabetes Care.