Integrating Process and Factor Understanding of Environmental Innovation by Water Utilities

Innovations in technology and organisations are central to enabling the water sector to adapt to major environmental changes such as climate change, land degradation or drinking water pollution. While there are literatures on innovation as a process and on the factors that influence it, there is little research that integrates these. Development of such an integrated understanding of innovation is central to understanding how policy makers and organisations can stimulate and direct environmental innovation. In the research reported here a framework is developed that enables such an integrated analysis of innovation process and factors. From research interviews and the literature twenty factors were identified that affect the five stages of the environmental innovation process in English and Welsh water utilities. The environmental innovations investigated are measures taken by water utilities to reduce or prevent pollution in drinking water catchments rather than technical measures to treat water. These Source Control Interventions are similar to other environmental innovations, such as ecosystem and species conservation, in that they emphasise the mix of technology, management and engagement with multiple actors. Results show that in water utilities direct performance regulation and regulation that raises awareness of a ‘performance’ gap as a ‘problem’ can stimulate innovation, but only under particular organisational, natural physical and regulatory conditions. The integrated framework also suggests that while flexible or framework legislation (e.g. Water Framework Directive) does not stimulate innovation in itself, it has shaped the option spaces and characteristics of innovations selected towards source control instead of technical end-of-pipe solutions.

[1]  Hans Heerkens,et al.  Assessing the Importance of Factors Determining Decision-Making by Actors Involved in Innovation Processes , 2006 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[3]  Marc Spiller,et al.  Implementing Pollution Source Control—Learning from the Innovation Process in English and Welsh Water Companies , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[4]  A. Cashman,et al.  Topping up or watering down? Sustainable development in the privatized UK water industry , 2007 .

[5]  Susse Georg,et al.  Regulating the environment: Changing from constraint to gentle coercion , 1994 .

[6]  Sanjay Sharma Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy , 2000 .

[7]  S. Roper,et al.  The innovation decision: an economic analysis , 2007 .

[8]  Andrew T. Brint,et al.  The rise, current position and future direction of asset management in utility industries , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  M. Moglia,et al.  Towards sustainable urban water management: a critical reassessment. , 2013, Water research.

[10]  Glen T. Daigger A vision for urban water and wastewater management in 2050 , 2013 .

[11]  Floor Brouwer Occurrence of Co-operative Agreements , 2003 .

[12]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Delivering sustainable urban water management: a review of the hurdles we face. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  Floor Brouwer,et al.  Governance of Water-related Conflicts in Agriculture , 2003 .

[14]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[15]  Maria Lee,et al.  EU Environmental Law: Challenges, Change and Decision-Making , 2005 .

[16]  D. Parsons,et al.  Identifying Adaptation Options and Constraints: The Role of Agronomist Knowledge in Catchment Management Strategy , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[17]  R. Rothwell Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[18]  B. McIntosh,et al.  The influence of supply and sewerage area characteristics on water and sewerage companies responses to the Water Framework Directive. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[19]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  Anaerobic Treatment in Decentralised and Source-Separation-Based Sanitation Concepts , 2006 .

[20]  Pablo del Río González,et al.  The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda , 2009 .

[21]  W. Verstraete,et al.  ZeroWasteWater: short-cycling of wastewater resources for sustainable cities of the future , 2011 .

[22]  B. Truffer,et al.  The impact of privatization on sustainability transitions: A comparative analysis of dynamic capabilities in three water utilities , 2015 .

[23]  J. Horbach Determinants of Environmental Innovation - New Evidence from German Panel Data Sources , 2006 .

[24]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[25]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Diffusion of Innovation , 2015 .

[26]  Marc Spiller,et al.  Flexible design in water and wastewater engineering--definitions, literature and decision guide. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Martin Cave,et al.  Independent review of competition and innovation in water markets : final report , 2009 .

[28]  Lorna Fewtrell,et al.  Water safety plans: managing drinking-water quality from catchment to consumer , 2005 .

[29]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[30]  Nicole Kar,et al.  The UK Department for Environment, Food And Rural Affairs ("Defra") publishes the final report of the Cave review of competition and innovation in water markets , 2009 .

[31]  Brian S. McIntosh,et al.  Pollution source control by water utilities – characterisation and implications for water management: research results from England and Wales , 2013 .

[32]  Marc Spiller,et al.  An organisational innovation perspective on change in water and wastewater systems – the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in England and Wales , 2012 .

[33]  G. Daigger Urban Water and Wastewater Management in 2050 , 2009 .

[34]  A. Verbeke,et al.  Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective , 2003 .

[35]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[36]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[37]  R. Ormrod,et al.  LOCAL CONTEXT AND INNOVATION DIFFUSION IN A WELL-CONNECTED WORLD , 1990 .

[38]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Towards transition management of European water resources , 2006 .

[39]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Different strokes: regulatory styles and environmental strategy in the North‐American oil and gas industry , 2001 .

[40]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[41]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[42]  D. Parsons,et al.  Diffuse pesticide pollution of drinking water sources: impact of legislation and UK responses , 2012 .

[44]  K. Rennings,et al.  Determinants of environmental product and process innovation , 1999 .

[45]  Antonio Hidalgo,et al.  Diffusion of eco-innovations: A review , 2014 .

[46]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[47]  Giulia Romano,et al.  Factors Affecting Water Utility Companies’ Decision to Promote the Reduction of Household Water Consumption , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[48]  Gordon Allan Assessing capital efficiency in the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: Ofwat's approach , 2006 .

[49]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  Rules Versus Discretion: The Productivity Consequences of Flexible Regulation , 2001 .

[50]  Ludwig Krämer,et al.  Eu Environmental Law , 2011 .

[51]  Roger R. Ford,et al.  The Crisis of Innovation in Water And Wastewater , 2005 .

[52]  Kathryn Harrison,et al.  Talking with the Donkey: Cooperative Approaches to Environmental Protection , 1998 .