Maximum a posteriori estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using a Rician noise model: Why, how and but

The diffusion tensor is a commonly used model for diffusion-weighted MR image data. The parameters are typically estimated by ordinary or weighted least squares on log-transformed data, assuming normal or log-normal distribution of measurement errors respectively. This may not be adequate when using high b-values and or performing high-resolution scans, resulting in poor SNR, in which case the difference between the assumed and the true (Rician) noise model becomes important. As a consequence the estimated diffusion parameters will be biased, underestimating the true diffusion. In this paper a computational framework is presented where parameters pertaining to a spectral decomposition of the diffusion tensor are estimated using a Rician noise model. The parameters are estimated using a Fisher-scoring scheme which gives robust and rapid convergence. It is demonstrated how the Fisher-information matrix can be used as a generic tool for designing optimal experiments. It is shown that the Rician noise model leads to significantly less biased estimates for a large range of b-values and SNR, but that the Rician estimates have a poorer precision compared to the Gaussian model for very low SNR. By pooling the Rician estimates of uncertainty over neighbouring voxel estimates with higher precision, but still not as high as with a Gaussian model, can be obtained. We suggest the use of a Rician estimator when it is important with truly quantitative values and when comparing different predictive models. The higher precision of the Gaussian estimates may be more important when the objective is to compare diffusion related parameters over time or across groups.

[1]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[2]  S. Rice Mathematical analysis of random noise , 1944 .

[3]  N G Papadakis,et al.  A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[4]  Gareth J. Barker,et al.  Optimal imaging parameters for fiber-orientation estimation in diffusion MRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  P. Basser,et al.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[6]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[7]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  L. Joseph,et al.  Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction , 1989 .

[10]  G. McLachlan,et al.  The EM algorithm and extensions , 1996 .

[11]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Fully Bayesian spatio-temporal modeling of FMRI data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  D. Alexander A general framework for experiment design in diffusion MRI and its application in measuring direct tissue‐microstructure features , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Purushottam W. Laud Bayesian Statistics: An Introduction, second edition. Peter M. Lee, Arnold, 1997. No. of pages: xii+344. Price: £19.99. ISBN 0-340-67785-6 , 1999 .

[14]  R. Henkelman Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[15]  P. Basser,et al.  A unifying theoretical and algorithmic framework for least squares methods of estimation in diffusion tensor imaging. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[16]  S Skare,et al.  Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[17]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[18]  L. Hall,et al.  Optimization of diffusion measurements using Cramer‐Rao lower bound theory and its application to articular cartilage , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Cheng Guan Koay,et al.  Analytically exact correction scheme for signal extraction from noisy magnitude MR signals. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[20]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  Cheng Guan Koay,et al.  Investigation of anomalous estimates of tensor‐derived quantities in diffusion tensor imaging , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study † , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  “Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins”: How noise distorts diffusion‐weighted MR data , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Stefan Skare,et al.  A Model-Based Method for Retrospective Correction of Geometric Distortions in Diffusion-Weighted EPI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[25]  Anders Kristoffersen,et al.  Optimal estimation of the diffusion coefficient from non-averaged and averaged noisy magnitude data. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[26]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion‐weighted MR imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  S. Skare,et al.  Noise considerations in the determination of diffusion tensor anisotropy. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  O. Karlsen,et al.  Parameter estimation from Rician‐distributed data sets using a maximum likelihood estimator: Application to t1 and perfusion measurements , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.