Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity with sensor-tip guidewires: a new methodologic approach for assessment of coronary hemodynamics before and after coronary interventions.

[1]  A. Gershlick,et al.  Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: a proposal of new comparative approaches based on quantitative angiography. , 1992, British heart journal.

[2]  P. Serruys,et al.  Limitations of the zero crossing detector in the analysis of intracoronary Doppler: a comparison with fast Fourier transform analysis of basal, hyperemic, and transstenotic blood flow velocity measurements in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[3]  C J Slager,et al.  Intracoronary blood flow velocity and transstenotic pressure gradient using sensor-tip pressure and Doppler guidewires: a new technology for the assessment of stenosis severity in the catheterization laboratory. , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[4]  J. Reiber,et al.  Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries. , 1992, American heart journal.

[5]  P D Verdouw,et al.  In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[6]  M. Kern,et al.  Alterations of phasic coronary artery flow velocity in humans during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  P. Serruys,et al.  Calibration using angiographic catheters as scaling devices--importance of filming the catheters not filled with contrast medium. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  H. M. Payne,et al.  Validation of A Doppler Guide Wire for Intravascular Measurement of Coronary Artery Flow Velocity , 1992, Circulation.

[9]  南都 伸介.  Temporal increase in resting coronary blood flow causes an impairment of coronary flow reserve after coronary angioplasty , 1992 .

[10]  G. Mancini,et al.  Establishing comprehensive, quantitative criteria for detection of restenosis and remodeling after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  L. Tenerz,et al.  Initial experiences with a miniaturized pressure transducer during coronary angioplasty. , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[12]  K. Gallagher,et al.  Instantaneous Hyperemic Flow‐Versus‐Pressure Slope Index: Microsphere Validation of an Alternative to Measures of Coronary Reserve , 1991, Circulation.

[13]  M. Kern,et al.  Detection of coronary collateral flow by a Doppler-tipped guide wire during coronary angioplasty. , 1991, American heart journal.

[14]  K. Lance Gould,et al.  Coronary Artery Stenosis , 1990 .

[15]  F. Klocke.  Cognition in the era of technology: "seeing the shades of gray". , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  K. Gould,et al.  Coronary flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  M Sugawara,et al.  Blood Flow in the Heart and Large Vessels , 1989, Springer Japan.

[18]  K. Gallagher,et al.  The diastolic hyperemic flow versus pressure relation. A new index of coronary stenosis severity and flow reserve. , 1989, Circulation.

[19]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Impaired coronary vasodilator reserve in the immediate postcoronary angioplasty period: analysis of coronary artery flow velocity indexes and regional cardiac venous efflux. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  M. Sugawara.  Stenosis: Theoretical Background , 1989 .

[21]  S. M. Collins,et al.  The effect of coronary angioplasty on coronary flow reserve. , 1988, Circulation.

[22]  P. Serruys,et al.  Coronary blood flow velocity during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty as a guide for assessment of the functional result. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  J. Reiber,et al.  How to assess the immediate results of PTCA. Should we use pressure gradient, flow reserve or minimal luminal cross-sectional area? , 1988 .

[24]  J. Reiber,et al.  Does intracoronary papaverine dilate epicardial coronary arteries? Implications for the assessment of coronary flow reserve. , 1988, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[25]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  New Developments in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1988, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[26]  F. Klocke,et al.  Measurements of coronary flow reserve: defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care. , 1987, Circulation.

[27]  R. Wilson,et al.  Methods of measurement of myocardial blood flow in patients: a critical review. , 1987, Circulation.

[28]  E J Topol,et al.  Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  R. Wilson,et al.  Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary arterial lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease. , 1987, Circulation.

[30]  P. Serruys,et al.  Papaverine: the ideal coronary vasodilator for investigating coronary flow reserve? A study of timing, magnitude, reproducibility, and safety of the coronary hyperemic response after intracoronary papaverine. , 1986, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[31]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Predictive survival models for resuscitated victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with coronary heart disease. , 1985, Circulation.

[32]  R. Mates,et al.  Coronary Pressure‐Flow Relationships: Controversial Issues and Probable Implications , 1985, Circulation research.

[33]  J. J. Gerbrands,et al.  Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.

[34]  J. Reiber,et al.  Values and limitations of transstenotic pressure gradients measured during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. , 1985, Herz.

[35]  C. Hartley,et al.  Diastolic coronary artery pressure-flow velocity relationships in conscious man. , 1984, Cardiovascular research.

[36]  H J ten Katen,et al.  Assessment of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by quantitative coronary angiography: diameter versus densitometric area measurements. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[37]  C. White,et al.  The value of lesion cross-sectional area determined by quantitative coronary angiography in assessing the physiologic significance of proximal left anterior descending coronary arterial stenoses. , 1984, Circulation.

[38]  R. Leiboff,et al.  Determinants of transstenotic gradients observed during angioplasty: an experimental model. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[39]  R. Bellamy,et al.  Calculation of coronary vascular resistance. , 1980, Cardiovascular research.

[40]  W. Siegenthaler,et al.  Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  G W Hamilton,et al.  Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.