Effect of head position on cephalometric evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile.

OBJECTIVES During a cone beam CT scan, the patient is in an upright or supine position. This position depends on the brand and type of the scanner. The aims of this study are: (1) to investigate if the head position has an effect on cephalometric evaluation of the soft-tissue facial profile, comparing the recordings in natural head position (NHP) and supine head position (SHP) and (2) to investigate if age, gender and body mass index (BMI) are contributing factors to the effect of the head position. METHODS 90 subjects were photographed in profile both in NHP and in SHP. 12 soft-tissue angular and linear cephalometric values were calculated. Two-way random intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine observer reliability. Paired t-tests and linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the differences between the head positions and the influence of age, gender and BMI. RESULTS Intraobserver reliability was generally high. Paired t-tests showed significant changes as a result of head positioning (p < 0.0001) in 9 of the 12 measurements. These differences were small and clinically not relevant, except for the "lower face-throat angle". Regression analysis revealed no relevant influence of age, gender and BMI. CONCLUSIONS Cephalometric soft-tissue evaluation from a recording in SHP is generally reliable, except for the throat-chin area where a clinically relevant difference was found. The contour of the submandibular tissues in SHP causes the chin to appear more prominently. This can cause incorrect orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

[1]  P. Dijkstra,et al.  Reliability of the integrated radiograph-photograph method to obtain natural head position in cephalometric diagnosis. , 2011, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  W. Evans,et al.  Facial soft tissue: the alpha and omega of treatment planning in orthognathic surgery , 2009, BDJ.

[3]  Sang-Hun Yu,et al.  Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  G. W. Arnett,et al.  Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  M. S. Cooke,et al.  Fifteen-year reproducibility of natural head posture: A longitudinal study. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  David M. Sarver,et al.  Esthetic Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery , 1998 .

[7]  M. S. Cooke Five-year reproducibility of natural head posture: a longitudinal study. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  P. Wisth,et al.  The reliability of cephalometric soft tissue measurements. , 1975, Archives of oral biology.

[9]  S Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.

[10]  Sheldon Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements , 1971 .

[11]  B Solow,et al.  Natural head position in standing subjects. , 1971, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[12]  S Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.