On meaningful parameters for routing in VANETs urban environments under realistic mobility patterns

A Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (VANET) is an instance of MANETs that establishes wireless connections between cars. In VANETs, routing protocols and other techniques must be adapted to vehicular-specific capabilities and requirements. As many previous works have shown, routing performance is greatly dependent to the availability and stability of wireless links, which makes it a crucial parameter that should not be neglected in order to obtain accurate performance measurements in VANETs. Although routing protocols have already been analyzed and compared in the past, simulations and comparisons have almost always been done considering random motions with non-urban specific parameters. But what would be the effects of urban motions on the simulation parameters, and what would be their consequences on routing performance ? In this paper, we illustrate how realistic motion patterns affect the velocity and how new parameters become necessary to evaluate the performance of routing protocols in VANETs. To express our point, we evaluate the performance of AODV with realistic urban scenarios. We show how new urban specific parameters have significant impacts on routing, and de-facto replace some non-urban specific parameters. For example, the average velocity appears to be irrelevant in urban scenarios and should be replaced by road segment lengths.

[1]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[2]  D. Helbing Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems , 2000, cond-mat/0012229.

[3]  Martin Treiber,et al.  Realistische Mikrosimulation von Straßenverkehr mit einem einfachen Modell , 2004 .

[4]  S. Jaap,et al.  Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks in City Traffic Scenarios , 2005 .

[5]  Raúl Aquino-Santos,et al.  Performance evaluation of routing protocols in vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2005, Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput..

[6]  R Akcelik,et al.  ACCELERATION AND DECELERATION MODELS , 2002 .

[7]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Comparative Study of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks , 2002 .

[8]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Performance of Multipoint Relaying in Ad Hoc Mobile Routing Protocols , 2002, NETWORKING.

[9]  Lars Wolf,et al.  Evaluation of Routing Protocols for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks in Typical Road Traffic Scenarios , 2005 .

[10]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[11]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[12]  C. Bonnet,et al.  A framework for mobility models generation and its application to inter-vehicular networks , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing.

[13]  Bartosz Mielczarek,et al.  Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[14]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Towards realistic mobility models for mobile ad hoc networks , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[15]  Samir Ranjan Das,et al.  Comparative performance evaluation of routing protocols for mobile, ad hoc networks , 1998, Proceedings 7th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (Cat. No.98EX226).

[16]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  VanetMobiSim: generating realistic mobility patterns for VANETs , 2006, VANET '06.