Topological relations between fuzzy regions: derivation of verbal terms

Abstract A method is presented to generate verbal terms about topological relations between fuzzy regions. The methodology relies on the fuzzy 4-intersection, which is a generalization of the crisp 4-intersection of Egenhofer and co-workers. The computation of the similarity between the fuzzy- and the crisp 4-intersection enables the verbal term, i.e., the linguistic variable, to be derived. The linguistic variable contains a semantic part which gives an immediate association to a crisp relation and a quantifier which indicates the strength of the relationship. Since the derivation of the linguistic variable depends on the definition of the boundary of the fuzzy regions, a method is presented to compute fuzzy boundaries. The approach here defines fuzzy boundaries so that each point in the fuzzy region is associated a partial membership in both the interior and the boundary of the region. This view is different from the boundary definition in crisp topology, but it agrees with the fuzzy set idea that elements can have partial membership in different sets. A simulation experiment demonstrates the properties of the proposed methodology, and it shows how the linguistic variable relates to an inclusion index. An example illustrates how some level of action can be associated to the linguistic variable, which is applicable in the course control of moving crafts, in military applications or in other kinds of operations where the level of warning or action depends on the topological relation between the fuzzy regions. The findings in this article are applicable to geographical information systems (GIS), the modelling of objects with indeterminate boundaries, in the reasoning about relations between geographical objects, or the evaluation of database queries. If the ideas in the present article are implemented in GIS, this will provide an enhanced user interface compared to most GIS today.

[1]  Eliseo Clementini,et al.  Mining multiple-level spatial association rules for objects with a broad boundary , 2000, Data Knowl. Eng..

[2]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .

[3]  Virginia R. Young,et al.  Fuzzy subsethood , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[4]  Steven A. Gaal,et al.  Point Set Topology , 1964 .

[5]  Valerie V. Cross,et al.  Fuzzy objects for geographical information systems , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[6]  Valerie V. Cross Fuzzy extensions for relationships in a generalized object model , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[7]  Jayant Sharma,et al.  Topological Relations Between Regions in R² and Z² , 1993, SSD.

[8]  John G. Stell,et al.  Spatial relations between indeterminate regions , 2001, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[9]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Scale in a digital geographic world , 1997 .

[10]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[11]  B. Balkay,et al.  Introduction to lattice theory , 1965 .

[12]  A. McBratney,et al.  Application of fuzzy sets in soil science: fuzzy logic, fuzzy measurements and fuzzy decisions , 1997 .

[13]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Geographical data modeling , 1992 .

[14]  Peter A. Burrough,et al.  Natural Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries , 2020 .

[15]  M. Egenhofer Categorizing Binary Topological Relations Between Regions, Lines, and Points in Geographic Databases , 1998 .

[16]  Jonathan Lee,et al.  A note on current approaches to extending fuzzy logic to object‐oriented modeling , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[17]  Zongmin Ma,et al.  Conceptual design of fuzzy object‐oriented databases using extended entity‐relationship model , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[18]  C. L. Chang,et al.  Fuzzy topological spaces , 1968 .

[19]  F. Benjamin Zhan,et al.  Approximate analysis of binary topological relations between geographic regions with indeterminate boundaries , 1998, Soft Comput..

[20]  Peter Fisher,et al.  Sorites paradox and vague geographies , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  A. W. Schurle Topics in Topology , 1979 .

[22]  David Altman,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theoretic Approaches for Handling Imprecision in Spatial Analysis , 1994, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  The ‘Egg-Yolk’ Representation of Regions with Indeterminate Boundaries , 2020 .

[24]  R. Yager SOME PROCEDURES FOR SELECTING FUZZY SET-THEORETIC OPERATORS , 1982 .

[25]  Ying-ming Liu,et al.  Fuzzy Topology , 1998, Advances in Fuzzy Systems - Applications and Theory.

[26]  Markus Schneider,et al.  Uncertainty Management for Spatial Data in Databases: Fuzzy Spatial Data Types , 1999, SSD.

[27]  Wen-June Wang,et al.  New similarity measures on fuzzy sets and on elements , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[28]  N. Chrisman Exploring Geographic Information Systems , 1997 .

[29]  David M. Mark,et al.  Natural-Language Spatial Relations Between Linear and Areal Objects: The Topology and Metric of English-Language Terms , 1998, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[30]  M. Egenhofer,et al.  Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations , 2001 .

[31]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Engineering , 1996 .

[32]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  The Algebraic Structure of Sets of Regions , 1997, COSIT.

[33]  Juan Tarrés,et al.  On the boundary of fuzzy sets , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier,et al.  Towards general measures of comparison of objects , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[35]  Stephan Winter Topological relations between discrete regions , 1995 .