Collaborative reliability analysis for multidisciplinary systems design

Traditional Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) generates deterministic optimal designs, which are frequently pushed to the limits of design constraint boundaries, leaving little or no room to accommodate uncertainties in system input, modeling, and simulation. As a result, the design solution obtained may be highly sensitive to the variations of system input which will lead to performance loss and the solution is often risky (high likelihood of undesired events). Reliability-based design is one of the alternative techniques for design under uncertainty. The natural method to perform reliability analysis in multidisciplinary systems is the all-in-one approach where the existing reliability analysis techniques are applied directly to the systemlevel multidisciplinary analysis. However, the all-onone reliability analysis method requires a double loop procedure and therefore is generally very time consuming. To improve the efficiency of reliability analysis under the MDO framework, a collaborative reliability analysis method is proposed in this paper. The procedure of the traditional Most Probable Point (MPP) based reliability analysis method is combined with the collaborative disciplinary analyses to automatically satisfy the interdisciplinary consistency in reliability analysis. As a result, only a single loop procedure is required and all the computations are conducted concurrently at the individual disciplinelevel. Compared with the existing reliability analysis methods in MDO, the proposed method is more efficient and therefore provides a cheaper tool to evaluate design feasibility in MDO under uncertainty. Two examples are used for the purpose of verification.

[1]  Wei Chen,et al.  Towards a Better Understanding of Modeling Feasibility Robustness in Engineering Design , 2000 .

[2]  Y.-T. Wu Methods for efficient probabilistic analysis of systems with large number of random variables , 1998 .

[3]  S. Batill,et al.  AN ITERATIVE CONCURRENT SUBSPACE ROBUST DESIGN FRAMEWORK , 2000 .

[4]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  A MOST PROBABLE POINT BASED METHOD FOR UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[5]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Robust Design Simulation: A Probabilistic Approach to Multidisciplinary Design , 1999 .

[6]  L Walsh Joanne,et al.  Optimization Issues With Complex Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analysis , 1998 .

[7]  David R. Oakley,et al.  Multidisciplinary Stochastic Optimization , 1995 .

[8]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[9]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Efficient Uncertainty Analysis Methods for Multidisciplinary Robust Design , 2002 .

[10]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Use of the Collaborative Optimization Architecture for Launch Vehicle Design , 1996 .

[11]  A. M. Hasofer,et al.  Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format , 1974 .

[12]  Jean-Claude Mitteau Error evaluations for the computation of failure probability in static structural reliability problems , 1999 .

[13]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Statistical Approximations for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: The Problem of Size , 1999 .

[14]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  An algorithm for solving the system-level problem in multilevel optimization , 1994 .

[15]  L Walsh Joanne,et al.  Multilevel Decomposition Approach to Integrated Aerodynamic/Dynamic/Structural Optimization of Helicopter Rotor Blades , 2003 .

[16]  Wei Chen,et al.  Methodology for Managing the Effect of Uncertainty in Simulation-Based Design , 2000 .

[17]  John E. Renaud,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN SUBJECT TO UNCERTAINTY , 1998 .

[18]  Natalia Alexandrov,et al.  Analytical and Computational Aspects of Collaborative Optimization for Multidisciplinary Design , 2002 .

[19]  V. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  MULTIDISCIPLINARY HIGH-FIDELITY ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF AEROSPACE VEHICLES, PART 1: FORMULATION , 2013 .

[20]  L Padula Sharon,et al.  Multidisciplinary Optimization of Controlled Space Structures With Global Sensitivity Equations , 2003 .

[21]  J. C. Townsend,et al.  Multidisciplinary High-Fidelity Analysis and Optimization of Aerospace Vehicles , 2013 .

[22]  J. Périaux,et al.  Multidisciplinary shape optimization in aerodynamics and electromagnetics using genetic algorithms , 1999 .

[23]  Patrick N. Koch,et al.  A MULTI-STAGE, PARALLEL IMPLEMENTATION OF PROBABILISTIC DESIGN OPTIMIZATION IN AN MDO FRAMEWORK , 2000 .

[24]  A. Harbitz An efficient sampling method for probability of failure calculation , 1986 .

[25]  Robert H. Sues,et al.  An innovative framework for reliability-based MDO , 2000 .

[26]  A. H. Hadid,et al.  Multidisciplinary Approach to Aerospike Nozzle Design , 1997 .

[27]  T. Cruse,et al.  Advanced probabilistic structural analysis method for implicit performance functions , 1990 .