Some aspects of temporal coding for single-channel electrical stimulation of the cochlea

Estimates of the useful frequency range for single-channel electrical stimulation of the cochlea range from 400 to 4000 Hz. Psychophysical studies in single-channel implant patients are relevant not only to the practical problem of designing stimulation strategies, but also to questions of temporal processing of pitch in the normal auditory nervous system. Patients with single-channel extracochlear devices participated in several experiments involving stimuli differing in fine temporal structure. Stochastic pulse trains, in which the probability of pulse delivery (p) for a given cycle was less than 1.0, were readily discriminated from ordinary pulse trains. Frequency discrimination using stochastic pulse trains differing only in fine temporal structure (but identical average pulse rates) was as good as with ordinary pulse trains or sinusoids for P greater than or equal to 0.5, but deteriorated rapidly for P less than 0.5. Discrimination of triangular and trapezoidal waveforms from square waves was surprisingly good: rise-times (for 0 to maximum current) as low as 0.08 ms could be discriminated. Conversely, detection of jitter in pulse trains was almost an order of magnitude worse. The results show that frequency discrimination for single-channel electrical stimulation of the cochlea is based on discrimination of inter-pulse periods, and that pulse rates which would be unnatural for acoustically-evoked VIIIth nerve activity - up to 750 Hz - are more useful for coding mid-range frequencies than low-rate stochastic stimulations of normal VIIIth nerve firing patterns. The waveform discriminations reported would be obscured by low-pass filtering even at 2000 Hz, and probably depend on changes in relative synchrony among an array of VIIIth nerve units with different thresholds. In general, these results support the use of analog coding schemes with relatively large bandwidth.

[1]  Edwin C. Moxon,et al.  Physiological Considerations in Artificial Stimulation of the Inner Ear , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[2]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[3]  E S Hochmair,et al.  PERCEPTS ELICITED BY DIFFERENT SPEECH‐CODING STRATEGIES a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  N. Kiang,et al.  Single unit activity in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  N Dillier,et al.  Electrical stimulation of hearing by implanted cochlear electrodes in humans. , 1982, Applied neurophysiology.

[7]  E. Evans Place and time coding of frequency in the peripheral auditory system: some physiological pros and cons. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[8]  Bilger Rc,et al.  Psychoacoustic evaluation of present prostheses. , 1977 .

[9]  N. Dillier,et al.  COMPUTERIZED TESTING OF SIGNAL‐ENCODING STRATEGIES WITH ROUND‐WINDOW IMPLANTS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Murray B. Sachs,et al.  Representation of voice pitch in discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers , 1984, Hearing Research.

[11]  C. G. Müller,et al.  COMPARISON OF PERCEPTS FOUND WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANT DEVICES , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1984, Hearing Research.

[13]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  Mechanisms of signal analysis and pattern perception in periodicity pitch. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[16]  H Levitt,et al.  Adaptive testing in audiology. , 1978, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[17]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the cat cochlea. Discharge pattern of single auditory fibres , 1984 .

[18]  M I Miller,et al.  SPEECH ENCODING IN THE AUDITORY NERVE: IMPLICATIONS FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  I. Hochmair-Desoyer,et al.  PERCEPTS FROM THE VIENNA COCHLEAR PROSTHESIS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Walter A. Rosenblith,et al.  Theory of Hearing , 1950 .

[21]  E S Hochmair,et al.  Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses. , 1981, Medical progress through technology.