Repair bond strength of aged resin composite using different surface treatments and bonding protocols

Background: Repair of direct composites are less invasive than replacement, diminishing the risk of iatrogenic exposure of the pulp and the risk of detrimental to adjacent teeth, all in all, reducing the procession of the “restoration death spiral”. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the repair bond strength of aged resin composites using different surface treatments and bonding protocols. Materials and Methods: A total of 45 discs (n=45) were fabricated of Nanohybrid composite measuring about 2.5 mm in height and 3.5 mm in diameter and were mounted in acrylic resin and subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles between 5-55 ? C with 30 seconds of dwell time in a thermocycler in order to simulate artificial ageing. All these samples were assigned into three groups (n=15) based on the surface treatment protocol. According to the bonding protocol, the samples in each group are further divided into three subgroups (n=5). After surface treatments of the aged composites, the application of bonding agent followed by new composite material was performed. All the samples were stored in distilled water at 37 ? C for 24 hours. The shear bond strength of the samples was measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. Results: Among the groups, the mean bond strength in medium grain diamond bur and 37% phosphoric acid etchant with the universal bonding agent subgroup was higher 852.56±27.71 than the remaining groups. The lowest mean bond strength of 200.9±10.62 was observed in 37% Etchant with direct composite subgroup. Conclusion: Different combinations of surface treatments and bonding protocols affect shear bond strength differently. The highest shear bond strength values were achieved for the group where surface treatment was done with the combination of blue diamond bur and 37% phosphoric acid along with a universal bonding agent.

[1]  Rama Krishna Alla,et al.  An overview of dentin bonding agents , 2019, International Journal of Dental Materials.

[2]  C. Gonzaga,et al.  Composite-composite Adhesion as a Function of Adhesive-composite Material and Surface Treatment. , 2019, Operative dentistry.

[3]  H. Balkaya,et al.  Bonding performance of universal adhesives on composite repairs, with or without silane application , 2018, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[4]  Ruchi Gupta,et al.  In Vitro Evaluation of Marginal Sealing Ability of Bulk Fill Flowable Composite Resins , 2017 .

[5]  J. Dahl,et al.  Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method , 2017, Acta biomaterialia odontologica Scandinavica.

[6]  B. Loomans,et al.  Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016 .

[7]  Maryam Saadat,et al.  Micromorphology and bond strength evaluation of adhesive interface of a self‐adhering flowable composite resin–dentin: Effect of surface treatment , 2016, Microscopy research and technique.

[8]  N. Opdam,et al.  Guidance on posterior resin composites: Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section. , 2014, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  Jeong-Kil Park,et al.  Influence of light-curing units on the polymerization of low-shrinkage composite resins. , 2013, Dental materials journal.

[10]  D. Eren,et al.  Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin , 2012, Lasers in Medical Science.

[11]  N. Ballal,et al.  Evaluation of the influence of flowable liner and two different adhesive systems on the microleakage of packable composite resin , 2012 .

[12]  M. Ozcan,et al.  Effect of aging conditions on the repair bond strength of a microhybrid and a nanohybrid resin composite. , 2010, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[13]  S. Dunne,et al.  Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  Stephen Bayne,et al.  FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations—update and clinical examples , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[15]  B. Haller,et al.  Effect of different surface treatments on the composite–composite repair bond strength , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[16]  R. Basting,et al.  Small cross-sectional survey of composite restoration attributes associated with choices for replacement. , 2009, Brazilian oral research.

[17]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  J. Stelzig,et al.  Repairability of Cross-linked Biopolymers , 2009, Journal of dental research.

[19]  G. Eskitaşçıoğlu,et al.  Effect of surface treatments and different adhesives on the hybrid layer thickness of non-carious cervical lesions. , 2008, Operative dentistry.

[20]  Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha,et al.  BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN-RESIN INTERFACES CONTAMINATED WITH SALIVA AND SUBMITTED TO DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENTS , 2007, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[21]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[22]  M. Ozcan,et al.  Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[23]  A. Cavalcanti,et al.  Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. , 2007, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[24]  C. Leevailoj,et al.  Shear bond strength of dual-cured and self-cured resin composites to dentin using different bonding agents and techniques. , 2007, Operative dentistry.

[25]  F. Tay,et al.  Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[26]  J. Ferracane Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[27]  E. Swift,et al.  Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[28]  Mario Fernando de Goes,et al.  The in vitro morphological effects of some current pre-treatments on dentin surface: a SEM evaluation. , 2005, Operative dentistry.

[29]  B. Darvell,et al.  Aspects of water sorption from the air, water and artificial saliva in resin composite restorative materials. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[30]  C. Lucena-Martín,et al.  The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites , 2001 .

[31]  I. Mjör,et al.  Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. , 2000, International dental journal.

[32]  J. Ferracane,et al.  In vitro aging of dental composites in water--effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[33]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[34]  G. Lewis,et al.  Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations. , 1998, Operative dentistry.

[35]  M. Vargas,et al.  Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. , 1997, American journal of dentistry.

[36]  T. Brosh,et al.  Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[37]  J. Longmate,et al.  Filler Leachability of Composites Stored in Distilled Water or Artificial Saliva , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[38]  Rama Krishna Alla,et al.  Dental Composites - A Versatile Restorative Material: An Overview , 2013 .

[39]  C. Sabatini Effect of phosphoric acid etching on the shear bond strength of two self-etch adhesives , 2013, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[40]  Jack L Ferracane,et al.  Resin composite--state of the art. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[41]  Jagadish,et al.  The role of oxygen inhibited layer on the shear bond strength of composites - An in-vitro evaluation , 2007 .

[42]  T. Bonstein,et al.  Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[43]  E J Swift,et al.  Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. , 1995, Quintessence international.