Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Technology-supported training is emerging as a solution to support therapists in their efforts providing high-intensity, repetitive, and task-specific treatment, in order to enhance the recovery process. The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of different robotic devices (end-effector and exoskeleton robots) in comparison with any other type of intervention. Furthermore, we aim to assess whether or not better improvements are obtained in the sub-acute phase after stroke onset than in the chronic phase. A research was conducted in the electronic bibliographic databases Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. A total of 17 studies were included: 14 randomized controlled trials, 2 systematic reviews, and one meta-analysis. Fugl-Meyer and modified Ashworth scale were selected to measure primary outcomes, i.e., motor function and muscle tone. Functional independence measure and motor activity log were selected to measure secondary outcomes, i.e., activities of daily living. In comparison with conventional therapy, the robot-assisted rehabilitation is more effective in improving upper limb motor function recovery, especially in chronic stroke patients. No significant improvements are observed in the reduction of muscle tone or daily living activities. The present systematic review shows that the use of robotic devices can positively affect the recovery of arm function in patients with stroke.

[1]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[3]  Mary Elizabeth Parker,et al.  Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study , 1995 .

[4]  S McEwen,et al.  Disablement following stroke. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  Federica De Santis,et al.  EPIDEMIOLOGY OF STROKE , 2002, Clinical and experimental hypertension.

[7]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[8]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Guilbert Jj.  The world health report 2002 - reducing risks, promoting healthy life. , 2003 .

[10]  H. Vet,et al.  Clinimetric Properties of the Motor Activity Log for the Assessment of Arm Use in Hemiparetic Patients , 2004, Stroke.

[11]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[12]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[13]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2005, Stroke.

[14]  Paul M. Blobaum.  Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) , 2006 .

[15]  C. Burgar,et al.  MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  S. Masiero,et al.  Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  Jeremy M. Grimshaw,et al.  Increasing the demand for childhood vaccination in developing countries: a systematic review , 2009, BMC international health and human rights.

[18]  H. Krebs,et al.  Mechanical Arm Trainer for the Treatment of the Severely Affected Arm After a Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[19]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  Hannes Devos,et al.  Time Course of Trunk, Arm, Leg, and Functional Recovery After Ischemic Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Sarah J. Housman,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  Loris Pignolo,et al.  Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[24]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[25]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: Department of Veterans Affairs multisite clinical trial. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[27]  S. Masiero,et al.  Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[28]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Effects of Treatment Intensity in Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Therapy for Chronic Stroke , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[29]  Y. Hsieh,et al.  Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial , 2012, Clinical rehabilitation.

[30]  Sheng Quan Xie,et al.  Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[31]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Motor cortex excitability and connectivity in chronic stroke: a multimodal model of functional reorganization , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[32]  V. Dietz,et al.  Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[33]  Rahsaan J. Holley,et al.  Robotic Therapy Provides a Stimulus for Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke That Is Complementary to and Distinct From Conventional Therapy , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[34]  Stefano Mazzoleni,et al.  Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[35]  R. Calabró,et al.  Robotic neurorehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke: psychological well-being beyond motor improvement , 2015, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[36]  Preeti Raghavan,et al.  Upper Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke. , 2015, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[37]  T. Jones,et al.  Motor System Reorganization After Stroke: Stimulating and Training Toward Perfection. , 2015, Physiology.

[38]  Margherita Russo,et al.  Who May Benefit From Armeo Power Treatment? A Neurophysiological Approach to Predict Neurorehabilitation Outcomes , 2016, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.