Seismic response of box-type tunnels in soft soil: Experimental and numerical investigation

Abstract A series of dynamic centrifuge tests were carried out at the geotechnical centrifuge facility of IFSTTAR in Nantes, to investigate the response of box-type tunnels embedded in dry sand under sinusoidal and seismic excitation, as affected by soil-tunnel relative flexibility and soil-structure interface rugosity. The system under investigation was analyzed by means of full dynamic time history analyses, implementing rigorous finite element models. The numerical models were calibrated on the basis of back analysis of tests, while the numerical predictions were compared with experimental data, in terms of soil and tunnel horizontal acceleration, soil shear strains and tunnel deformations. The validated numerical models were then employed to further investigate several aspects of the system seismic response. Results indicate a rocking deformation mode coupled with the well-known racking distortion of box-type tunnels under seismic shaking. The effect of the soil-tunnel interface characteristics and soil yielding on the racking deformation of the tunnel, the dynamic earth pressures and shear stresses around the tunnel, as well as on dynamic lining forces is also reported. Soil yielding leads to post-shaking, residual, dynamic earth pressures, shear stresses and lining forces, especially in the case of flexible tunnels, while interface characteristics affect the distributions of these response parameters around the perimeter of the tunnel section. The ability of simplified seismic design methods for tunnels to predict the response is finally discussed, by comparing their predictions with the recorded data and the numerical results.

[1]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Dynamic response of flexible square tunnels: centrifuge testing and validation of existing design methodologies , 2015 .

[2]  Dong-Soo Kim,et al.  Effect of underground tunnel on the ground surface acceleration , 2014 .

[3]  Joseph Penzien,et al.  Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings , 2000 .

[4]  Daniela Boldini,et al.  Numerical modelling of the transverse dynamic behaviour of circular tunnels in clayey soils , 2009 .

[5]  Lidija Zdravković,et al.  On the relative merits of simple and advanced constitutive models in dynamic analysis of tunnels , 2011 .

[6]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Ovaling deformations of circular tunnels under seismic loading, an update on seismic design and analysis of underground structures , 2005 .

[7]  Jui-Ching Chou,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling of Seismically Induced Uplift for the BART Transbay Tube , 2011 .

[8]  S. P. Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  A model study on the effects of input motion on the seismic behaviour of tunnels , 2011 .

[9]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Nonlinear Response of Deep Immersed Tunnel to Strong Seismic Shaking , 2007 .

[10]  Francesco Silvestri,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling of Seismic Loading on Tunnels in Sand , 2012 .

[11]  Vincent P. Drnevich,et al.  Shear modulus and damping in soils , 1972 .

[12]  G. Gazetas,et al.  Behaviour of deep immersed tunnel under combined normal fault rupture deformation and subsequent seismic shaking , 2008 .

[13]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[14]  Buddhima Indraratna,et al.  Analytical solution for radial consolidation considering soil structure characteristics , 2015 .

[15]  Sunil Sharma,et al.  Underground opening damage from earthquakes , 1991 .

[16]  Stavroula Kontoe,et al.  Numerical validation of analytical solutions and their use for equivalent-linear seismic analysis of circular tunnels , 2014 .

[17]  Jean Louis Chazelas,et al.  Dynamic Response of Shallow Rectangular Tunnels in Sand by Centrifuge Testing , 2015 .

[18]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Analyses of Cohesionless Soils , 1986 .

[19]  I. Ishibashi,et al.  UNIFIED DYNAMIC SHEAR MODULI AND DAMPING RATIOS OF SAND AND CLAY , 1993 .

[20]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  A practical iterative procedure to estimate seismic-induced deformations of shallow rectangular structures , 2008 .

[21]  Geoffrey R. Martin,et al.  Seismic Analysis and Design of Retaining Walls, Buried Structures, Slopes, and Embankments , 2009 .

[22]  Hesham El Naggar,et al.  Seismic soil–culvert interaction1 , 2015 .

[23]  Xiuli Du,et al.  Shaking table test on the seismic failure characteristics of a subway station structure on liquefiable ground , 2013 .

[24]  Francesco Silvestri,et al.  A numerical Round Robin on tunnels under seismic actions , 2014 .

[25]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Performance and Seismic Design of Underground Structures , 2014 .

[26]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Evaluation of Shear Modulus and Damping in Dynamic Centrifuge Tests , 2005 .

[27]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  Analytical solution for deep rectangular structures subjected to far-field shear stresses , 2006 .

[28]  S. P. Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  Effect of depth on seismic response of circular tunnels , 2011 .

[29]  Mourad Zeghal,et al.  Analysis of Site Liquefaction Using Earthquake Records , 1994 .

[30]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Effect of buried depth and diameter on uplift of underground structures in liquefied soils , 2012 .

[31]  Sandra Escoffier,et al.  Numerical modeling of centrifuge cyclic lateral pile load experiments , 2009 .

[32]  Irini Djeran-Maigre,et al.  Shear modulus and damping ratio of grouted sand , 2004 .

[33]  N. Yoshida,et al.  Damage to Daikai Subway Station , 1996 .

[34]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Seismic Design Considerations for Underground Box Structures , 2010 .

[35]  Francesco Silvestri,et al.  Experimental and numerical study on circular tunnels under seismic loading , 2015 .

[36]  Sandra Escoffier,et al.  Using centrifuge tests data to identify the dynamic soil properties: Application to Fontainebleau sand , 2013 .

[37]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  Load Transfer Mechanisms between Underground Structure and Surrounding Ground: Evaluation of the Failure of the Daikai Station , 2005 .

[38]  Jiro Takemura,et al.  OBSERVED BEHAVIOUR OF A TUNNEL IN SAND SUBJECTED TO SHEAR DEFORMATION IN A CENTRIFUGE , 2010 .

[39]  Jean Louis Chazelas,et al.  Original technologies for proven performances for the new LCPC earthquake simulator , 2008 .

[40]  M. Yener Ozkan,et al.  Dynamic response of a flexible rectangular underground structure in sand: centrifuge modeling , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[41]  Birger Schmidt,et al.  SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES , 2001 .

[42]  Daniele Zonta,et al.  On the seismic response of shallow-buried rectangular structures , 2013 .

[43]  Antonio Bobet,et al.  Drained and undrained response of deep tunnels subjected to far-field shear loading , 2010 .

[44]  S. P. Gopal Madabhushi,et al.  EFFECT OF DEPTH ON THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF SQUARE TUNNELS , 2011 .

[45]  William Barclay,et al.  Seismic Design of Tunnels A Simple State-of-the-Art Design Approach , 1993 .