Structural optimization of hollow-section steel trusses by differential evolution algorithm

This paper deals with the weight minimization of planar steel trusses by adopting a differential evolution-based algorithm. Square hollow sections are considered. The design optimization refers to size, shape and topology. The design variables are represented by the geometrical dimensions of the cross sections of the different components of the truss, directly involving the size of the structure, and by some geometrical parameters affecting the outer shape of the truss. The topology is included in the optimization search in a particular way, since the designer at different runs of the algorithm can change the number of bays keeping constant the total length of the truss, to successively choose the best optimal solution. The minimum weight optimum design is posed as a single-objective optimization problem subject to constraints formulated in accordance with the current Eurocode 3. The optimal solution is obtained by a Differential Evolutionary (DE) algorithm. In the DE algorithm, a particular combination of mutation and crossover operators is adopted in order to achieve the best solutions and a specific way for dealing with constraints is introduced. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is shown with reference to two case-studies. The analysis results prove the versatility of the optimizer algorithm with regard to the three optimization categories of sizing, shape, topology as well as its high computational performances and its efficacy for practical applications. In particular useful practical indications concerning the geometrical dimensions of the various involved structural elements can be deduced by the optimal solutions: in a truss girder the cross section of the top chord should be bigger than the one of the bottom chord as well as diagonals should be characterized by smaller cross sections with respect to the top and bottom chords in order to simultaneously optimize the weight and ensure an optimal structural behaviour.

[1]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  Optimum design criteria for elastic structures subject to random dynamic loads , 2006 .

[2]  G. Guerlement,et al.  Discrete minimum weight design of steel structures using EC3 code , 2001 .

[3]  N. Katoh,et al.  Topology optimization of trusses with stress and local constraints on nodal stability and member intersection , 2005 .

[4]  Giuseppina Uva,et al.  An approximate solution for the rheological behavior of non-homogeneous structures changing the structural system during the construction process , 2013 .

[5]  Giuseppe Quaranta,et al.  Parametric Identification of Nonlinear Devices for Seismic Protection Using Soft Computing Techniques , 2013 .

[6]  Daniel A. Ashlock,et al.  Evolutionary computation for modeling and optimization , 2005 .

[7]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  Earthquake-Induced Lateral-Torsional Pounding between Two Equal Height Multi-Storey Buildings under Multiple Bi-Directional Ground Motions , 2013 .

[8]  Maria Marks,et al.  Automatic categorization of chloride migration into concrete modified with CFBC ash , 2012 .

[9]  Luigi Gambarotta,et al.  Assessment procedure and rehabilitation of riveted railway girders: The Campasso Bridge , 2009 .

[10]  Giuseppe Quaranta,et al.  Optimum design of prestressed concrete beams using constrained differential evolution algorithm , 2014 .

[11]  Zhibin Huang,et al.  An Improved Particle Swarm Optimizer for Truss Structure Optimization , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security.

[12]  G. Marano,et al.  Genetic-Algorithm-Based Strategies for Dynamic Identification of Nonlinear Systems with Noise-Corrupted Response , 2010 .

[13]  Alan D. Christiansen,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of trusses using genetic algorithms , 2000 .

[14]  Na Li,et al.  Optimal Design of Discrete Structure with Directed Mutation Genetic Algorithms , 2006, 2006 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[15]  H. Adeli,et al.  Augmented Lagrangian genetic algorithm for structural optimization , 1994 .

[16]  Jiaping Yang,et al.  Optimal Layout of Bridge Trusses by Genetic Algorithms , 1998 .

[17]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  A comparative study on parameter identification of fluid viscous dampers with different models , 2014 .

[18]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  Stochastic optimum design criterion of added viscous dampers for buildings seismic protection , 2007 .

[19]  Giuseppe Marano,et al.  Optimum design of linear tuned mass dampers for structures with nonlinear behaviour , 2010 .

[20]  Luigi Berardi,et al.  Predicting torsional strength of RC beams by using Evolutionary Polynomial Regression , 2012, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[21]  Hiroshi Ohmori,et al.  Elasto-plastic analysis based truss optimization using Genetic Algorithm , 2013 .

[22]  Luciano Lamberti,et al.  An efficient simulated annealing algorithm for design optimization of truss structures , 2008 .

[23]  Abhinav Gupta,et al.  A novel optimization approach for minimum cost design of trusses , 2007 .

[24]  Domenico Raffaele,et al.  Viscoelastic behaviour of non-homogeneous variable-section beams with post-poned restraints , 2012 .

[25]  H. Adeli,et al.  Integrated Genetic Algorithm for Optimization of Space Structures , 1993 .

[26]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Size/geometry optimization of trusses by the force method and genetic algorithm , 2004 .

[27]  Alain Nussbaumer,et al.  Experimental study on the fatigue behaviour of welded tubular K-joints for bridges , 2006 .

[28]  X. Zhao,et al.  Hollow sections in structural applications , 2010 .

[29]  Haydn N. G. Wadley,et al.  Cellular metal lattices with hollow trusses , 2005 .

[30]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[31]  A. Kaveh,et al.  Chaotic swarming of particles: A new method for size optimization of truss structures , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[32]  K. Deb,et al.  Design of truss-structures for minimum weight using genetic algorithms , 2001 .

[33]  H.-G Dauner,et al.  The lully viaduct, a composite bridge with steel tube truss , 1998 .

[34]  Giuseppe Quaranta,et al.  Evolutionary Polynomial Regression-Based Statistical Determination of the Shear Capacity Equation for Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups , 2016, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[35]  Lung-Wen Tsai,et al.  Mechanism Design: Enumeration of Kinematic Structures According to Function , 2001 .

[36]  Hiroshi Ohmori,et al.  Truss topology optimization by a modified genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[37]  Stojan Kravanja,et al.  Cost estimation, optimization and competitiveness of different composite floor systems—Part 2: Optimization based competitiveness between the composite I beams, channel-section and hollow-section trusses , 2006 .

[38]  P. Hajela,et al.  Genetic algorithms in truss topological optimization , 1995 .

[39]  V. Toğan,et al.  Optimization of 3d trusses with adaptive approach in genetic algorithms , 2006 .

[40]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[41]  M. Galante,et al.  GENETIC ALGORITHMS AS AN APPROACH TO OPTIMIZE REAL‐WORLD TRUSSES , 1996 .

[42]  T. Shi,et al.  A method for shape and topology optimization of truss-like structure , 2013 .