Usability testing of bed information management system: A think-aloud method

Not considering the usability in designing clinical information systems causes problems in human–computer interaction and patient dissatisfaction. Therefore, in this study, the usability of the bed information management system (BIMS) was examined by think-aloud method. This cross-sectional study was conducted on the BIMS in 50 noneducational hospitals. Participants consisted of three groups including users, facilitators, and technical support. To carry out the study, a scenario consisting of four tasks was designed. Three researchers analyzed the recorded files to identify the usability problems and their severity. The mean time of the evaluation process was 20:33 ± 4:47 s. The total number of the problems identifies by users was 80 cases. Data entry and layout problems with 38 (48%) and 33 (41%) cases were the most frequently found problems, respectively. About 61% and 55% of the data entry and layout problems had a minor severity (Severity 2), respectively. Furthermore, 43 (54%) cases of the problems were resolved by the users and 32 (40%) cases by the facilitator assistance. This study showed that a large number of the problems were due to the system poor design. Furthermore, by increasing the users' level of knowledge about the system, it is possible to enhance user-system interaction. It is recommended that before designing and implementing a system, the system should be evaluated for usability, and the users should be educated in clinical information systems.

[1]  Monique W. M. Jaspers,et al.  Determination of the effectiveness of two methods for usability evaluation using a CPOE medication ordering system , 2011, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  R. Boaden,et al.  Developing bed managers: the why and the how. , 2007, Journal of nursing management.

[3]  Titus Schleyer,et al.  Comparative study of heuristic evaluation and usability testing methods. , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[4]  Suzanne Bakken,et al.  A Comparison of Usability Evaluation Methods: Heuristic Evaluation versus End-User Think-Aloud Protocol - An Example from a Web-based Communication Tool for Nurse Scheduling , 2009, AMIA.

[5]  Peter Elkin,et al.  The Human Factors Engineering Approach to Biomedical Informatics Projects: State of the Art, Results, Benefits and Challenges , 2007, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[6]  Ashish Joshi,et al.  Usability of a Patient Education and Motivation Tool Using Heuristic Evaluation , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Computerized Provider Order Entry Adoption: Implications for Clinical Workflow , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[8]  Elizabeth M Borycki,et al.  Low-cost rapid usability engineering: designing and customizing usable healthcare information systems. , 2006, Healthcare quarterly.

[9]  Adem Karahoca,et al.  Information system design for a hospital emergency department: A usability analysis of software prototypes , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[10]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005 .

[11]  Elizabeth M Borycki,et al.  Technology induced error and usability: The relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  K. Baumlin,et al.  A Pilot Study on Usability Analysis of Emergency Department Information System by Nurses , 2012, Applied Clinical Informatics.