Social Networking Tools in Virtual Reference

The rapid advancements in web and availability of growing number of free social networking tools have greatly influenced the present day communication mechanisms. These tools have provided cheaper, instant and faster methods of communicating information irrespective of geographical and time barriers. Users especially the younger generation is much familiar with the use of such tools and modern libraries are experiencing rapid changes in user perceptions and information seeking patterns. Owing to the ease of accessibility of plethora of information resources via cell phones, tablets using smart apps, libraries are revisiting their methods of information delivery. Many libraries are using social networking tools for handling user queries and advertising their library products especially in Virtual Reference Services (VRS). Virtual reference is reference service initiated electronically where patrons employ computers or other technology to communicate with public services staff without being physically present. Communication channels used frequently in virtual reference include chat, video-conferencing, voice-over-IP, co-browsing, e-mail, and instant messaging (Reference and User Services Association [RUSA] Guidelines, 2010). It primarily refers to a network of expertise, intermediation and resources placed at the disposal of someone seeking answers in an online environment (Berube, 2003). It has brought about tremendous change in the concept of reference services in terms of information dissemination and user satisfaction. Various initiatives have already been taken to develop standards, guidelines and procedures for setting up successful digital reference systems. Virtual reference has emerged as a new powerful method of delivering reference and information service to a vast number of clientele distributed globally. It includes seamless access to global resources and the collection of knowledge for reference access, coupled with complementary access to information on the internet. It has brought about tremendous change in the concept of reference services in terms of information dissemination and user satisfaction. The seamless influence of Social Networking tools on virtual reference is quite evident and trend is fast shifting towards incorporating such tools in libraries at global level. These tools not only solve the problems of communicating in real time environment in all modes ranging from instant messaging to audio/visuals but also provide ample opportunities for libraries to retain their users. The present work thus discusses the concept of Virtual Reference Service and possible use of different Social Networking tools in present day Virtual Reference Systems for successfully addressing user queries.

[1]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld , 2009, New Media Soc..

[2]  Adrianna Lukasiewicz,et al.  Exploring the role of digital academic libraries : Changing student needs demand innovative service approach , 2007 .

[3]  Courtney Louise Young Crowdsourcing the Virtual Reference Interview with Twitter , 2014 .

[4]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Exploring behavioral transfer from knowledge seeking to knowledge contributing: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  R. David Lankes The digital reference research agenda , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Multi-User Virtual Environments for Education and Training? A Critical Review of Second Life , 2008 .

[7]  Bernie Sloan Reference Service in the Digital Library: A Report on the Ready for Reference Project , 2001 .

[8]  Helen S. Du,et al.  Social networking tools for academic libraries , 2013, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Krista Godfrey,et al.  A new world for virtual reference , 2008, Libr. Hi Tech.

[10]  Lawrence Olszewski,et al.  An International Comparison of Virtual Reference Services , 2010 .

[11]  Nicholas Joint,et al.  Virtual reference, Second Life and traditional library enquiry services , 2008 .

[12]  Ellen Forsyth,et al.  Picturing your community: Flickr use in public libraries , 2010 .

[13]  Jinchao Zhang,et al.  Comparing digital libraries with virtual communities from the perspective of e-quality , 2014, Libr. Hi Tech.

[14]  Sarah Milstein Twitter for Libraries (and Librarians). , 2009 .

[15]  En-yi Chou,et al.  Intention to Adopt Knowledge through Virtual Communities: Posters vs. Lurkers , 2012, Online Inf. Rev..

[16]  Min Huang,et al.  Study on the collaboration mechanism of the virtual reference service , 2007, Electron. Libr..

[17]  S. M. Zabed Ahmed,et al.  Students’ perceptions of academic use of social networking sites: a survey of university students in Bangladesh , 2012 .

[18]  Susie Skarl,et al.  Libraries atwitter: trends in academic library tweeting , 2012 .

[19]  Marcus Childress,et al.  Using Massively Multiplayer Online Role‐Playing Games for Online Learning , 2006 .

[20]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Lesley M. Moyo,et al.  Electronic libraries and the emergence of new service paradigms , 2004, Electron. Libr..

[22]  John T. Butler,et al.  Developing a model to provide digital reference services , 2001 .

[23]  Dean Hendrix,et al.  Use of Facebook in academic health sciences libraries. , 2009, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[24]  Scott B. Mandernack,et al.  The Emerging Reference Paradigm: A Vision of Reference Services in a Complex Information Environment , 2001, Libr. Trends.

[25]  Isabelle Bouty Interpersonal and Interaction Influences on Informal Resource Exchanges Between R&D Researchers Across Organizational Boundaries , 2000 .

[26]  Y. Connie Yuan,et al.  Shall I Google it or ask the competent villain down the hall? The moderating role of information need in information source selection , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[27]  Gobinda G. Chowdhury,et al.  Digital libraries and reference services: present and future , 2002, J. Documentation.

[28]  David A. Tyckoson On the desirableness of personal relations between librarians and readers: the past and future of reference service , 2003 .

[29]  Sam Stormont Looking to Connect: Technical Challenges That Impede the Growth of Virtual Reference , 2007 .

[30]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[31]  Brad Hokanson,et al.  Narrative Structure, Myth, and Cognition for Instructional Design , 2008 .

[32]  Suzanne M. Gray Virtual Reference Services Directions and Agendas , 2000 .

[33]  Joseph Janes Virtual reference services: An informal history (and possible future) of digital reference , 2008 .

[34]  Robert P. Holley,et al.  Social networking in academic libraries: the possibilities and the concerns , 2010 .

[35]  Emmanuel E. Baro,et al.  Awareness and use of Web 2.0 tools by librarians in university libraries in Nigeria , 2013, OCLC Syst. Serv..