Is there evidence for the use of lesion sterilization and tissue repair therapy in the endodontic treatment of primary teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses

[1]  Hasan Camcı,et al.  Three-dimensional assessment of two different canine retraction techniques: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial , 2021, Progress in orthodontics.

[2]  Graciela E López,et al.  Evaluation of 3Mix-MP and pulpectomies in non-vital primary molars. , 2019, Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL.

[3]  A. El-Housseiny,et al.  A comparison of calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste and zinc oxide eugenol as root filling materials for pulpectomy in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2019, Clinical and experimental dental research.

[4]  S. Reddy,et al.  Triple antibiotic paste versus propolis: A clinical quest for the reliable treatment of periapical lesions in primary molars , 2019 .

[5]  N. Sharma,et al.  Comparison of resorption rate of primary teeth treated with alternative lesion sterilization and tissue repair and conventional endodontic treatment: An in vivo randomized clinical trial , 2018, Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[6]  Mohammad F. Ali,et al.  Evaluation of Pain and Tenderness in Endodontic Treatment of Deciduous Teeth using (LSTR) 3-Mix MP therapy , 2018 .

[7]  A. Sai Sankar,et al.  Endodontic treatment of chronically infected primary teeth using triple antibiotic paste: An in vivo study , 2017, Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD.

[8]  S. Thakur,et al.  In Search of a Novel Substitute: Clinical and Radiological Success of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair with Modified 3Mix-MP Antibiotic Paste and Conventional Pulpectomy for Primary Molars with Pulp Involvement with 18 Months Follow-up , 2017, Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.

[9]  Bader Munir,et al.  COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF TRIPLE ANTIBIOTIC PASTE(3MIX) AND VITAPEX FOR ROOT CANAL TREATMENT OF PULPALLY INVOLVED PRIMARY MOLARS , 2017 .

[10]  R. Widmer,et al.  Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. , 2017, Pediatric dentistry.

[11]  L. Maia,et al.  Does Smear Layer Removal Influence Root Canal Therapy Outcome? A Systematic Review. , 2016, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[12]  C. Leles,et al.  Ineffectiveness of Antibiotic-Based Pulpotomy for Primary Molars: a Survival Analysis , 2015 .

[13]  V. Sachdev,et al.  Comparison of endoflas and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary dentition. , 2014, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[14]  A. Glenny,et al.  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  H. Ahmed.  Pulpectomy procedures in primary molar teeth , 2014 .

[16]  V. Sirimaharaj,et al.  Retrospective Study of Pulpectomy with Vitapex ® and LSTR with Three Antibiotics Combination (3Mix) for Non-Vital Pulp Treatment in Primary Teeth* , 2013 .

[17]  R. Luiz,et al.  The influence of smear layer removal on primary tooth pulpectomy outcome: a 24-month, double-blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial evaluation. , 2012, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[18]  M. Agarwal,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Noninstrumentation Endodontic Techniques with Conventional ZOE Pulpectomy in Deciduous Molars: An in vivo Study , 2011 .

[19]  P. Tannure,et al.  Long-term outcomes of primary tooth pulpectomy with and without smear layer removal: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial. , 2011, Pediatric dentistry.

[20]  F. Tay,et al.  Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[21]  S. Nakornchai,et al.  Clinical evaluation of 3Mix and Vitapex as treatment options for pulpally involved primary molars. , 2010, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[22]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  P. Poornima,et al.  Comparison of digital radiography, decalcification, and histologic sectioning in the detection of accessory canals in furcation areas of human primary molars. , 2008, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[24]  E. Sridevi,et al.  Endodontic treatment of primary teeth using combination of antibacterial drugs: an in vivo study. , 2008, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[25]  M. Moffat,et al.  Pulp therapy for primary molars. , 2006, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[26]  G. Holan,et al.  Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[27]  E. Hoshino,et al.  Endodontic treatment of primary teeth using a combination of antibacterial drugs. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[28]  M. Iwaku,et al.  In-vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline. , 1996, International endodontic journal.

[29]  E. Hoshino,et al.  In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility to combinations of drugs on bacteria from carious and endodontic lesions of human deciduous teeth. , 1993, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[30]  M. Iwaku,et al.  Bactericidal efficacy of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, minocycline and rifampicin against bacteria of carious and endodontic lesions of human deciduous teeth in vitro , 1992 .

[31]  M. Iwaku,et al.  Bactericidal efficacy of metronidazole against bacteria of human carious dentin in vivo. , 1989, Caries research.

[32]  M. Iwaku,et al.  Bactericidal efficacy of metronidazole against bacteria of human carious dentin in vitro. , 1988, Caries research.