Dimensions of Reading Motivation: Development of an Adult Reading Motivation Scale

This study explored dimensions of adult reading motivation and collected reliability and validity information for a measure that assesses individual differences in adult reading motivation. Reading engagement theory provided the basis for an initial pool of items. A factor analysis showed that four dimensions, (a) reading as part of the self, (b) reading efficacy, (c) reading for recognition, and (d) reading to do well in other realms, accounted for a substantial amount of the variance in reading motivation. An overall reading motivation scale of 21 items with subscales representing the four dimensions was created using items with high factor loadings. The internal consistency of the total reading motivation scale was good and the internal consistencies of the subscales were reasonable. The total scale and subscales predicted reading enjoyment and time spent reading. A better understanding of adult reading motivation may aid those who support adult readers.

[1]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Dimensions of Children's Motivation for Reading and Their Relations to Reading Activity and Reading Achievement. , 1999 .

[2]  Jeff McQuillan, Julie Au.  THE EFFECT OF PRINT ACCESS ON READING FREQUENCY , 2001 .

[3]  Bonnie Nichols,et al.  Reading At Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. Research Division Report #46. , 2004 .

[4]  W. R. Kitz.  Adult Literacy , 1988 .

[5]  M. Cecil Smith,et al.  Literacy for the Twenty-First Century: Research, Policy, Practices, and the National Adult Literacy Survey , 1998 .

[6]  J. Dartigues,et al.  Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly , 2007 .

[7]  H. Markus.  Self-schemata and processing information about the self. , 1977 .

[8]  Marley W. Watkins,et al.  Reading Motivation: Multidimensional and Indeterminate , 2004 .

[9]  Alice M. Scales, Ock Rhee.  ADULT READING HABITS AND PATTERNS , 2001 .

[10]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Motivational and Cognitive Predictors of Text Comprehension and Reading Amount , 1999 .

[11]  J. Harackiewicz,et al.  The effects of cooperation and competition on intrinsic motivation and performance. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  W. Velicer,et al.  Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. , 1986 .

[13]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[14]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. , 2000 .

[15]  Wayne F. Velicer,et al.  The Relation Between Factor Score Estimates, Image Scores, and Principal Component Scores , 1976 .

[16]  John M. Malouff,et al.  UNIVERSITY STUDENT READING PREFERENCES IN RELATION TO THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS , 2004 .

[17]  T. E. Smith.  Time and academic achievement , 1990, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[18]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Assessing Print Exposure and Orthographic Processing Skill in Children: A Quick Measure of Reading Experience. , 1990 .

[19]  Kathleen C. Perencevich,et al.  Increasing Reading Comprehension and Engagement Through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction , 2004 .

[20]  Reading Achievement and Attitude Productivity among 17-Year Olds , 1983 .

[21]  Susan B. Neuman,et al.  The functions of reading: A cross-cultural perspective , 1990 .

[22]  C Loehlin John,et al.  Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis , 1986 .

[23]  K. Stanovich.  Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers , 2000 .

[24]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Classroom Conditions for Motivation and Engagement in Reading , 2001 .

[25]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Relations of Children's Motivation for Reading to the Amount and Breadth of Their Reading. , 1997 .