Adoption framework for advanced manufacturing technologies

The paper examines the adoption of advanced manufacturing technology (AMT). The general proposition is that the adoption of AMT reflects an interactive learning process, which is described by the extant use of AMT, firm-specific AMT knowledge accumulation, and the transfer of AMT ideas among networks of firms, suppliers, industry associations and government. This general proposition was specified as a structural equation model of Adoption of AMT. Data were based on the experiences of 224 Australian manufacturing companies that have invested and succeeded in using AMT. The results suggest that the adoption of AMT is primarily a function of a firm's assets for AMT, which comprise the resources, capabilities, and competences for developing and using AMT. The relationship between the adoption of AMT and assets for AMT was reciprocal, which implied a process of dynamic accumulation of both technology and human assets — a view consonant with the competence perspective of the firm. Overall, assets for AMT represent the AMT knowledge base of firms, and were shown to have a crucial role in determining the adoption of AMT.

[1]  B. Lundvall.  National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[2]  S. Snell,et al.  Integrated Manufacturing and Human Resource Management: A Human Capital Perspective , 1992 .

[3]  Susan Kitchell.  Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovation adoption: A qualitative/quantitative approach , 1995 .

[4]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  MANUFACTURING PROACTIVENESS AND PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[5]  Stephen R. Rosenthal,et al.  Progress toward the “factory of the future” , 1984 .

[6]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[7]  Nachoem M. Wijnberg,et al.  Innovation and Organization: Value and Competition in Selection Systems , 2004 .

[8]  Timothy Warner,et al.  Information technology as a competitive burden , 1989 .

[9]  V. Grover,et al.  An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory , 1998 .

[10]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Intangible assets as determinants of advanced manufacturing technology adoption in SME's: toward an evolutionary model , 1996 .

[11]  Louis A. Lefebvre,et al.  Firm innovativeness and CEO characteristics in small manufacturing firms , 1992 .

[12]  I. Chen,et al.  Determining organizational structure choices in advanced manufacturing technology management , 1997 .

[13]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[14]  George Mechling,et al.  Exploiting AMT in small manufacturing firms for global competitiveness , 1995 .

[15]  E. O'Connor,et al.  Gaining Advanced Manufacturing Technologies' Benefits: The Roles of Organization Design and Culture , 1992 .

[16]  David Lei,et al.  Computer‐integrated Manufacturing (CIM): Redefining the Manufacturing Firm into a Global Service Business , 1991 .

[17]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Towards a Competence Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[18]  Mohamed Zairi.  Management of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 1992 .

[19]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[20]  S. Newell,et al.  The Role of Professional Associations in Technology Diffusion , 1995 .

[21]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Impacts of Programmable Manufacturing Technology: A Review of Recent Studies and Contingency Formulation , 1993 .

[22]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[23]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  The strategic advantages of new manufacturing technologies for small firms , 1987 .

[24]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[25]  P. Evans,et al.  The global challenge : Australian manufacturing in the 1990s , 1990 .

[26]  R. Germain.  The role of context and structure in radical and incremental logistics innovation adoption , 1996 .

[27]  E. James Flynn,et al.  INNOVATION HISTORY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS. , 1995 .

[28]  M. Hitt,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology: Organizational Design and Strategic Flexibility , 1996 .

[29]  Tomas McKelvey.  Using evolutionary theory to define systems of Innovation , 1997 .

[30]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[31]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Managing Flexible Automation , 1988 .

[32]  Robert L. Edsall,et al.  Innovation and Organization , 2000 .

[33]  S. Snell,et al.  Integrated Manufacturing and Job Design: Moderating Effects of Organizational Inertia , 1991 .

[34]  Thomas L. Legare.  MINIMIZING RESISTANCE TO TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE A Power and Politics Approach , 1995 .

[35]  V. Lai,et al.  An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: a discriminative approach , 1997 .

[36]  S. Snell,et al.  THE STRATEGIC USE OF INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION , 1996 .

[37]  Eric Abrahamson.  Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations , 1991 .

[38]  Jerald Hage,et al.  Organizational and Technological Predictors of Change in automaticity , 1988 .

[39]  Kenneth K. Boyer,et al.  Unlocking the potential of advanced manufacturing technologies , 1997 .

[40]  J. Nunnally,et al.  Psychometric Theory: NY. , 1978 .

[41]  Richard N. Osborn,et al.  Nomothetical Nets and Higher Order Factor Analysis in Middle Range Theory Development , 1980 .

[42]  J. Thong,et al.  CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses , 1995 .

[43]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Computer Integrated Manufacturing: Empirical Implications for Industrial Information Systems , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Mark A. Vonderembse,et al.  Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance , 1999 .

[45]  G. Susman,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology and Organization Structure: Empowerment or Subordination? , 1992 .

[46]  B. Dalum.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[47]  Robert T. Lund,et al.  Keeping America at work: Strategies for employing the new technologies , 1986 .

[48]  Nigel King,et al.  Innovation at Work: The Research Literature , 1990 .

[49]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[50]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Size and Innovation , 1992 .

[51]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Just‐in‐time and context , 1995 .

[52]  R. Nelson.  Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? , 1991 .

[53]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[54]  W. Abernathy,et al.  The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock t o Znnovation in the Automobile Industry , 1978 .

[55]  P. Swamidass,et al.  Explaining manufacturing technology use, firm size and performance using a multidimensional view of technology , 1998 .

[56]  J. Toulouse,et al.  The behavior of business managers when adopting new technologies , 1996 .