Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents . Part 2 : IDAC performance influencing factors model

This is the second in a series of five papers describing the information, decision, and action in crew context (IDAC) model for human reliability analysis. An example application of this modeling technique is also discussed in this series. The model is developed to probabilistically predict the responses of the nuclear power plant control room operating crew in accident conditions. The operator response spectrum includes cognitive, psychological, and physical activities during the course of an accident. This paper identifies the IDAC set of performance influencing factors (PIFs), providing their definitions and causal organization in the form of a modular influence diagram. Fifty PIFs are identified to support the IDAC model to be implemented in a computer simulation environment. They are classified into eleven hierarchically structured groups. The PIFs within each group are independent to each other; however, dependencies may exist between PIFs within different groups. The supporting evidence for the selection and organization of the influence paths based on psychological literature, observations, and various human reliability analysis methodologies is also indicated. r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 1: Overview of the IDAC Model , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  A. Mosleh,et al.  Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 3: IDAC operator response model , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents. Part 4: IDAC causal model of operator problem-solving response , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 5: Dynamic probabilistic simulation of the IDAC model , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  JULIE POVALL,et al.  Risk Appraisal , 2006 .

[6]  William L. Farmer,et al.  Current Directions and Issues in Personnel Selection and Classification , 2003 .

[7]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Development and application of a human error identification tool for air traffic control. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  J. N. Sørensen,et al.  Safety culture: a survey of the state-of-the-art , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Stephen G. Green,et al.  Leadership self‐efficacy and managers' motivation for leading change , 2002 .

[10]  Barnes,et al.  The Human Performance Evaluation Process: A Resource for Reviewing the Identification and Resolution of Human Performance Problems , 2002 .

[11]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[12]  E. Salas,et al.  Reflections on shared cognition , 2001 .

[13]  Laurence Rognin,et al.  Human communication, mutual awareness and system dependability. Lessons learnt from air-traffic control field studies , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Wondea Jung,et al.  Development of the step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures using entropy concepts , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[16]  C R Paris,et al.  Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis , 2000, Ergonomics.

[17]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  Safety climate, attitudes and risk perception in Norsk Hydro , 2000 .

[18]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features☆ , 2000 .

[19]  J. Baron Thinking and deciding, 3rd ed. , 2000 .

[20]  I. Marcil,et al.  FATIGUE IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS: LITERATURE REVIEW - REVISED EDITION , 2000 .

[21]  Mark R. Rosekind,et al.  Crew Factors in Flight Operations XI: A Survey of Fatigue Factors in Regional Airline Operations , 1999 .

[22]  Ken Manktelow,et al.  Reasoning and Thinking , 1999 .

[23]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Personnel Selection: A Theoretical Approach , 1998 .

[24]  Arthur P. Brief,et al.  Attitudes in and around organizations , 1998 .

[25]  Rebecca Lawton,et al.  Not working to rule: Understanding procedural violations at work , 1998 .

[26]  Ola Svenson A decision theoretic approach to an accident sequence: when feedwater and auxiliary feedwater fail in a nuclear power plant , 1998 .

[27]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method : CREAM , 1998 .

[28]  Mathilde Bourrier,et al.  Elements for designing a Self-correcting Organisation: examples from nuclear power plants , 1998 .

[29]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[30]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[31]  O. Sträter,et al.  Human-centered modeling in human reliability analysis: some trends based on case studies , 1997 .

[32]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  The development of a nuclear chemical plant human reliability management approach: HRMS and JHEDI☆ , 1997 .

[33]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Human errors and work performance in a nuclear power plant control room: associations with work-related factors and behavioral coping☆ , 1997 .

[34]  Ed M. Dougherty,et al.  Is human failure a stochastic process , 1997 .

[35]  Kunihide Sasou,et al.  Modeling of a team's decision-making process , 1996 .

[36]  Ann Williamson,et al.  Industry differences in accident causation , 1996 .

[37]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Procedure for the analysis of errors of commission during non-power modes of nuclear power plant operation , 1996 .

[38]  Washington Human-system interface design review guideline -- Process and guidelines: Final report. Revision 1, Volume 1 , 1996 .

[39]  Ramaratnam R Bishu,et al.  On assessing operator response time in human reliability analysis (HRA) using a possibilistic fuzzy regression model , 1996 .

[40]  W. J. Luckas,et al.  Multidisciplinary framework for human reliability analysis with an application to errors of commission and dependencies , 1995 .

[41]  Robert E. Ornstein The Roots of the Self: Unraveling the Mystery of Who We Are , 1995 .

[42]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment , 1994 .

[43]  Kenneth L. McNally,et al.  Fatigue in Operational Settings: Examples from the Aviation Environment , 1994, Human factors.

[44]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[45]  Gerald W. Lewis Critical Incident Stress And Trauma In The Workplace: Recognition... Response... Recovery , 1994 .

[46]  Françoise Decortis Operator strategies in a dynamic environment in relation to an operator model , 1993 .

[47]  M. Paradies,et al.  Development of the NRC`s Human Performance Investigation Process (HPIP). Volume 1, Summary , 1993 .

[48]  A W Gaillard,et al.  Comparing the concepts of mental load and stress. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[49]  Board on Human-Systems Integration Workload Transition: Implications for Individual and Team Performance , 1993 .

[50]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[51]  Haleh Rastegary,et al.  The Interactions among Time Urgency, Uncertainty, and Time Pressure , 1993 .

[52]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Effects of Stress on Pilot Judgment in a MIDIS Simulator , 1993 .

[53]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making , 1993 .

[54]  R. E. Christal,et al.  Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[55]  Stephen L. Fink,et al.  High Commitment Workplaces , 1992 .

[56]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[57]  J. Freedman,et al.  Time pressure, task performance, and enjoyment. , 1988 .

[58]  Emilie M. Roth,et al.  Cognitive environment simulation: An artificial intelligence system for human performance assessment: Summary and overview: (Technical report, May 1986-June 1987) , 1987 .

[59]  D. D. Woods,et al.  Cognitive environment simulation: An artificial intelligence system for human performance assessment: Cognitive reliability analysis technique: (Technical report, May 1986-June 1987) , 1987 .

[60]  Egon Hansen Emotional processes : engendered by poetry and prose reading , 1986 .

[61]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[62]  S G Hart,et al.  Pilot Errors as a Source of Workload , 1984, Human factors.

[63]  B. Kirwan,et al.  SLIM-MAUD: an approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgment. Volume II. Detailed analysis of the technical issues , 1984 .

[64]  D. Saccuzzo,et al.  Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues , 1982 .

[65]  Paul D. Reynolds,et al.  The small group , 1981 .

[66]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[67]  T. B. Malone,et al.  Human factors evaluation of control room design and operator performance at Three Mile Island-2 , 1980 .

[68]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Motivation and Work Behaviour , 1978 .

[69]  Deborah J. Seaburg Values as Second Order Needs. , 1976 .

[70]  P. Crosbie Interaction in small groups , 1975 .

[71]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[72]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[73]  H. Triandis Attitude and attitude change , 1971 .

[74]  Richard O. Peterson,et al.  Job attitudes : review of research and opinion , 1959 .

[75]  Ronald Paul Yuzuk The assessment of employee morale : a comparison of two measures. , 1959 .

[76]  E. Cowen,et al.  The influence of varying degrees of psychological stress on problems-solving rigidity. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.